The impact of centralization of services on treatment delay in ovarian cancer: A study on process quality.

OBJECTIVE: Emphasis on improving healthcare quality has led to centralization of services for patients suspected of ovarian cancer. As centralization of services may induce treatment delays, we aimed to assess compliance with health system interval guidelines in patients suspected of ovarian cancer. DESIGN: Evaluation of health system intervals, comparison between direct and indirect referrals and between 2013 and 2014. SETTING: A managed clinical network (MCN) comprising 11 hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Patients that were treated for ovarian cancer within the University Medical Center Groningen in 2013 and 2014. INTERVENTION: Introduction of an MCN to centralize services for patients suspected of ovarian cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Compliance with national guidelines regarding health system intervals. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2014 a clinically relevant improvement in compliance with guidelines was demonstrated. Within this period, median treatment intervals decreased from 34 to 29 days, and the percentage of patients in which treatment interval guidelines were met increased from 63.5 to 72.2%. New regulations and increased awareness of health system intervals inspired changes in local practice leading to improved compliance with guidelines. Compliance was highest in patients that were directly referred to our academic hospital. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of health system intervals in patients suspected of ovarian cancer was feasible and may be applicable to other MCNs. Though compliance with guidelines improved within the study period, there is potential for improvement. To facilitate real-time evaluation of compliance with national guidelines establishing uniformity of electronic patient files in the MCN is deemed essential.

Less-favourable prognosis for low-risk endometrial cancer patients with a discordant pre- versus post-operative risk stratification.

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative risk stratification based on endometrial sampling determines the extent of surgery for endometrial cancer (EC). We investigated the concordance of pre- and post-operative risk stratifications and the impact of discordance on survival. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with EC within the first 6 months of the years 2005-2014 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (N = 7875). Pre- and post-operative risk stratifications were determined based on grade and/or histological subtype for 3784 eligible patients. RESULTS: A discordant risk stratification was found in 10% of patients: 4% (N = 155) had high pre- and low post-operative risk and 6% (N = 215) had low pre- and high post-operative risk. Overall survival of patients with high pre- and low post-operative risk was less favourable compared to those with a concordant low risk (80% versus 89%, p = 0.002). This difference remained significant when correcting for age, stage, surgical staging and adjuvant therapy (hazard ratio 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.28-2.53, p = 0.001). Survival of patients with low pre- and high post-operative risk did not differ from those with a concordant high risk (64% versus 62%, p = 0.295). CONCLUSION: Patients with high pre- and low post-operative risk have a less favourable prognosis compared to patients with a concordant low risk. Pre-operative risk stratifications contain independent prognostic information and should be incorporated into clinical decision-making.

Improved outcomes due to changes in organization of care for patients with ovarian cancer in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: Objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of changes in patterns of care, for example centralization and treatment sequence, on surgical outcome and survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with FIGO stage IIB-IV EOC (2004-2013) were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Primary outcomes were surgical outcome (extent of macroscopic residual tumor after surgery) and overall survival. Changes in treatment sequence (primary debulking surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (PDS+ACT) or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery (NACT+IDS)), hospital type and annual hospital volume were also evaluated. RESULTS: Patient and tumor characteristics of 7987 patients were retrieved. Most patients were diagnosed with stage III-IV EOC. The average annual case-load per hospital increased from 8 to 28. More patients received an optimal cytoreduction (tumor residue≤1cm) in 2013 (87%) compared to 2004 (55%, p<0.001). Complete cytoreduction (no macroscopic residual tumor), registered since 2010, increased from 42% to 52% (2010 and 2013, respectively, p<0.001). Optimal/complete cytoreduction was achieved in 85% in high volume (≥20 cytoreductive surgeries annually), 80% in medium (10-19 surgeries) and 71% in small hospitals (<10 surgeries, p<0.001). Within a selection of patients with advanced stage disease that underwent surgery the proportion of patients undergoing NACT+IDS increased from 28% (2004) to 71% (2013). Between 2004 and 2013 a 3% annual reduction in risk of death was observed (HR 0.97, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Changes in pattern of care for patients with EOC in the Netherlands have led to improvement in surgical outcome and survival.