Completed suicide in bipolar disorder patients: A cohort study after first hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a mental health condition that has one of the greatest risk of completed suicide (CS). Hospitalization in affective disorders is associated with increased illness severity and suicide risk, so the study of suicide after the first hospitalization is of special interest. METHOD: We studied a retrospective cohort consisting on all BD type I (BD-I) and II (BD-II) (according to DSM-IV criteria) admitted for the first time in their lives to the psychiatry unit of a general hospital between 1996 and 2016 from an area in Catalonia (Spain). All patients were also followed-up in a community center of mental health as outpatients until the end of 2017. Multiple variables were prospectively collected during the first hospital admission and were compared between patients who CS and those who did not. RESULTS: 14 of 313 (4.5%) bipolar patients included CS during the 11-year follow-up, and 93% used a violent method. In the univariate analysis we found that Bipolar II Disorder, treatment with antidepressants and/or with lamotrigine were associated with higher risk of CS, however, treatment with valproate and/or with antipsychotics were associated with lower risk of CS . After logistic regression multivariant analysis, only immediately previous violent suicide attempt and first-degree family history of CS remain significant risk factors of CS. A limitation is the relatively small sample from a local hospital and followed locally. CONCLUSION: Followed during an average of 11 years after the first hospital admission, Bipolar patients completed suicide at a rate 58 times higher than the general population and almost always performed through a violent method. Violent attempted suicide before admission and first- degree family history of CS, are clear and potent predictors of completed suicide.

Making sense of DSM-5 mania with depressive features.

OBJECTIVE: The assessment of the depressive component during mania has become critical for the accurate diagnosis of mixed states, which were defined very narrowly in the past classification systems before Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). The aim of this study was to compare socio-demographic, clinical and therapeutic characteristics, as well as clinical and functional outcomes, between manic patients with and without mixed features to validate the relevance of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.) mixed specifier. METHODS: This is a subanalysis of a multicentre naturalistic study MANía Aguda y COnsumo de Recursos (acute mania and health resource consumption [MANACOR]) on the burden of mania in bipolar patients from four hospitals in Catalonia (Spain). The sample consisted of 169 adult patients presenting a manic episode and systematically assessed during a 6-month period. RESULTS: A total of 27% (n = 46/169) of manic patients showed mixed features. Total number of episodes (p = 0.027), particularly depressive and mixed, was greater in manic patients with mixed features, as well as depressive onset (p = 0.018), suicide ideation (p = 0.036), rapid cycling (p = 0.035) and personality disorders (p = 0.071). In contrast, a higher percentage of pure manic subjects were inpatients (p = 0.035), started the illness with mania (p = 0.018) and showed family history of bipolar disorder (p = 0.037), congruent psychotic symptoms (p = 0.001) and cannabis use (p = 0.006). At baseline, pure manic patients received more risperidone (p = 0.028), while mixed patients received more valproate (p = 0.049) and antidepressants (p = 0.005). No differences were found in syndromic recovery at the end of the study. However, depressive change was higher in the mixed group (p = 0.010), while manic change was higher in the pure manic group (p = 0.029). At the end of follow-up, the group with mixed features showed a significant trend towards higher psychosocial dysfunction. CONCLUSION: A total of 27% of manic patients showed mixed features. Groups differed regarding clinical characteristics, course of illness, psychosocial functioning, prescribed treatment and symptom progress. Depressive symptoms in mania should be routinely assessed and considered to guide treatment.

Predictors of functional outcome after a manic episode.

BACKGROUND: The identification of functional outcome predictors after acute episodes of bipolar disorders (BD) may allow designing appropriate treatment aiming at restoring psychosocial functioning. Our objective was to identify the best functional outcome predictors at a 6-month follow-up after an index manic episode. METHODS: We conducted a naturalistic trial (MANACOR) focusing on the global burden of BD, with special emphasis on manic episode-associated costs. We observed patients with BD seen in services of four hospitals in Catalonia (Spain).The total sample included 169 patients with chronic DSM-IV-TR BD I suffering from an acute manic episode who were followed-up for 6 months. In this subanalysis we report the results of a stepwise multiple regression conducted by entering in the model those clinical and sociodemographic variables that were identified through preliminary bivariate Pearson correlations and using total scores on the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) at the 6-month follow-up as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Number of previous depressive episodes (Beta=3.25; t=3.23; p=0.002), presence of psychotic symptoms during the manic index episode (Beta=7.007; t=2.2; p=0.031) and the Body Mass Index (BMI) at baseline (Beta=0.62; t=2.09; p=0.041) were best predictors of functional outcome after a manic episode. LIMITATIONS: The main limitations of this study include the retrospective assessment of the episodes, which can be a source of bias, and the 6-month follow-up might have been too short for assessing the course of a chronic illness. CONCLUSIONS: Psychotic symptoms at index episode, number of past depressive episodes, and BMI predict worse outcome after 6 months follow-up after a manic episode, and may constitute the target of specific treatment strategies.

The real world cost and health resource utilization associated to manic episodes: The MANACOR study.

INTRODUCTION: Bipolar disorder is a relapsing-remitting condition affecting approximately 1-2% of the population. Even when the treatments available are effective, relapses are still very frequent. Therefore, the burden and cost associated to every new episode of the disorder have relevant implications in public health. The main objective of this study was to estimate the associated health resource consumption and direct costs of manic episodes in a real world clinical setting, taking into consideration clinical variables. METHODS: Bipolar I disorder patients who recently presented an acute manic episode based on DSM-IV criteria were consecutively included. Sociodemographic variables were retrospectively collected and during the 6 following months clinical variables were prospectively assessed (YMRS,HDRS-17,FAST and CGI-BP-M). The health resource consumption and associate cost were estimated based on hospitalization days, pharmacological treatment, emergency department and outpatient consultations. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-nine patients patients from 4 different university hospitals in Catalonia (Spain) were included. The mean direct cost of the manic episodes was €4,771. The 77% (€3,651) was attributable to hospitalization costs while 14% (€684) was related to pharmacological treatment, 8% (€386) to outpatient visits and only 1% (€50) to emergency room visits. The hospitalization days were the main cost driver. An initial FAST score>41 significantly predicted a higher direct cost. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the high cost and burden associated with BD and the need to design more cost-efficient strategies in the prevention and management of manic relapses in order to avoid hospital admissions. Poor baseline functioning predicted high costs, indicating the importance of functional assessment in bipolar disorder.

A long-term prospective study on the outcome of bipolar patients treated with long-acting injectable risperidone.

BACKGROUND: Risperidone is the first atypical antipsychotic to become available in a long-acting, injectable formulation. This is the first prospective study to assess the effectiveness of long-acting risperidone in a cohort of bipolar patients. METHODS: Twenty-nine DSM-IV acutely manic bipolar inpatients with a history of poor or partial adherence to medication entered the mirror-design observational study. They received naturalistic treatment for a manic episode plus long-acting, injectable risperidone for a mean period of 2 years. The following measures were used to assess the effectiveness of risperidone: the number of hospitalizations, the number of manic, mixed, and depressive episodes leading to hospitalization, the mean duration of hospitalizations, time to relapse, treatment adherence, aggression and suicide attempts. The Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) was used for clinical relevance as well. RESULTS: During the follow-up, there was a significant decrease in the number of hospitalizations per patient (Z-2.72 P < 0.006), in the number of manic or mixed episodes leading to hospitalization (Z-2.68 P < 0.007) but not in the hospitalizations due to depressive episodes, a decrease in the average length of hospitalization per patient (Z-3.27 P < 0.001), a significant increase in the time to any new episode (first relapse) (Z-3.28, P < 0.001), and significant improvements in treatment adherence (P < 0.0001) and hetero-aggressive episodes (P < 0.0001), but not suicide attempts (P = NS). At study endpoint 14 patients (48%) were very much improved according to the CGI. DISCUSSION: This observational long-term study provides support to long-acting injectable risperidone being effective for the maintenance treatment of mania and improving treatment adherence, reducing relapses and re-hospitalization rates.

Quetiapine in the treatment of rapid cycling bipolar disorder.

INTRODUCTION: This prospective open-label study assessed the impact of add-on quetiapine in the treatment of rapid cycling bipolar patients. METHODS: Fourteen rapid cycling bipolar patients were treated with quetiapine, which was added to their ongoing medication regimen for 112 +/- 33 days. At the beginning of the study, five were manic, three were in a mixed state, three were depressed, two hypomanic and one was euthymic. Patients were assessed prospectively with a modified version of the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Bipolars (CGI-BP), the Young Scale for mania (YMRS) and the Hamilton Scale for Depression (HDRS). RESULTS: A significant reduction of the following scale scores was observed: a 1.8 point reduction for the general CGI-BP (p = 0.013), a -1.3 point for the mania subscale (p = 0.016), a -1.01 point for the YMRS (p = 0.025). Improvement in depressive symptoms was not significant, neither in the CGI-BP (-1 point, p = 0.074) nor in the HDRS (-5.2 points, p = NS). The most common side-effect was sedation (n = 6, 43%). Doses of quetiapine were significantly reduced by the end of the study (443 +/- 235 mg/day versus 268 +/- 190 mg/day, p = 0.008) and they also differed according to the initial episode to be treated (720 +/- 84 mg/day for mania, and 183 +/- 29 mg/day for depression, p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Quetiapine could possibly be an effective treatment for rapid cycling bipolar patients. Adequate doses for acute episodes could significantly differ according to the episode polarity and the length of treatment.