RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Higher gender diversity correlates with higher patient satisfaction, higher-quality medical education, increased research productivity, and higher revenues. Although the field of Japanese orthopaedic surgery includes the lowest proportion of women and lags in gender diversity, reports on the current gender diversity status in academic activities are scarce. We investigated changes in women's participation in academic activities at the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) annual meetings over the past 11 years. METHODS: Data on the percentage of women in the JOA membership during 2012-2022 were analyzed to ascertain the proportion of women as first authors of oral and poster presentations, abstract reviewers, invited lecturers, seminar lecturers, general abstract oral chairpersons, symposium chairpersons, and speakers. Regarding the ratio of women among the JOA members during 2012-2022, we relied on data provided by the JOA. Data related to other categories were collected from the abstract book presented at the JOA Annual Meetings between 2012 and 2022. We analyzed the time trend for women's proportions using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: During 2012-2022, the percentage of female members (4.9-6.7%), poster first authors (2.7-4.3%), abstract reviewers (0-1.5%), general abstract oral chairpersons (0-2.3%), symposium chairpersons (0-3.6%), and symposium speakers (1.6-6.8%) had increased significantly (p < 0.05). Oral first authors (2.2-4.1%), invited lecturers (0-6.8%), or seminar lecturers (0%-6.7%) showed no trend. Women engaged in academic activities at all annual association meetings did not exceed the women's proportion among the association members. CONCLUSION: Although the proportion of women members of the JOA has gradually increased and more women are involved in its annual meetings, the proportion of female presenters, invited speakers, symposiasts, and chairpersons of oral and poster presentations is generally lower than that of women as JOA members. Members should be asked to raise awareness, including more active education of women as physicians in educational institutions and the creation of positive actions to select women as physicians for more important roles (chairpersons, educational speakers, and symposiasts) in the organization of annual meetings.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Few clinical studies have compared the operative outcomes between loose- and press-fit stems in radial head arthroplasty (RHA). We aimed to evaluate the radiographic and clinical results of the two radial head implant concepts. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, 32 patients (24 women and 8 men) with a mean age of 63.1 years who underwent RHA for comminuted radial head fractures were reviewed between 2005 and 2021. Seventeen patients underwent RHA with a loose-fit stem (L-group), whereas the remaining fifteen patients underwent RHA with a press-fit stem (P-group). The mean follow-up period was 40.1 ± 9.9 months, with the minimum follow-up duration of 12 months. The radiographic findings were evaluated for periprosthetic osteolysis; furthermore, clinical outcomes were analyzed to measure the range of motion of the elbow. The rate of reoperations and prosthesis removal were also reviewed. RESULTS: The general characteristics of the patients were similar in the two groups. The rate of periprosthetic osteolysis was 17.6% in the L-group, whereas it was 53.3% in the P-group. The mean elbow flexions were 128° and 133° in the L- and P-groups, respectively. The mean elbow extensions were -12° and -9° in the L- and P-groups, respectively. The rate of reoperation was 23.5% in the L-group and 15.2% in the P-group. One patient in the L-group had the prosthesis removed because of surgical site infection, whereas one patient in the P-group had the prosthesis removed owing to painful loosening. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in the clinical outcomes and reoperation rate were observed between the two radial head implant concepts in this study. However, osteolysis occurred more frequently in the P-group. Although patients with periprosthetic osteolysis are currently asymptomatic, they should be carefully followed up for the symptoms in the long term.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Monitoring trends in diving-related injuries enables implementation of effective safety measures. Divers Alert Network Japan (DAN Japan) membership includes insurance covering recreational diving-related injuries and fatalities. Use of claim data provides both a known denominator and demographic data about injured members. METHODS: The study analysed 325 insurance claims reported to DAN Japan from 2010 to 2014. Four fatalities were excluded, leaving 321 claims for analysis. Claimants were divided into three age groups: young adults (< 40 years); middle-aged (40-59 years) and older adults (≥ 60 years). The total injury claims rate (ICR), decompression illness (DCI) rate (DCR) and trauma rate (TCR) were calculated. Differences between the sexes within each age group were analysed. RESULTS: The total number of DAN Japan member-years in the period was 80,617, with a mean age of 45 years. Claims were made by 153 males and 168 females with a mean and median age of 46 years. Trauma was the most frequent reason for a claim (113 cases, 35%), followed by DCI (109 cases, 34%). The ICR (per 104 member-years) was 39.8 (95% confidence interval 35.5 to 44.2) and the TCR was 14.0 (11.4 to 16.6). For every age group, the ICR and TCR were significantly higher for females than males. The DCR was 13.5 (11.0 to 16.1) and did not significantly differ between the sexes. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of trauma-related diving injuries exceeds that of claims related to DCI. Females appear to have a higher risk of injury than the general diving population.