Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment options for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) are corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs, emerging monoclonal antibodies, rituximab, eculizumab, satralizumab, and inebilizumab. Due to disabling and deadly nature of NMOSD, there is a great motivation among physicians for finding new treatment options. Recently, several studies have been conducted on the therapeutic effects of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) on NMOSD patients. METHODS: Several databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google scholar were searched for studies on AHSCT in NMOSD patients. RESULTS: After screening titles and abstracts, and reviewing full texts, nine studies with 39 severe cases of NMOSD met the criteria of our study. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for EDSS score before and after treatment was -0.81 (95 %CI:-1.07, -0.15; Q = 1.99, P = 0.58, I2 = 0 %). Also, the PFS and RFS were 69 % and 53 % respectively (PFS: 69 %, 95 %CI 42 %, 96 %; Q = 8.63, P = 0.01, I2 = 73.07 %; RFS: 53 %, 95 %CI 27 %, 79 %; Q = 12.33, P = 0.01, I2 = 71.87 %). Also, there were three cases with secondary autoimmune diseases including myasthenia gravis, hyperthyroidism, and thyroiditis. CONCLUSION: According to the present study, AHSCT could be an alternative therapy for NMOSD in severe cases instead of conventional immunotherapies. However, physicians should pay attention to its serious complications. The diversity of results from the published trials on the efficacy and safety of AHSCT calls for further investigations on determining the ideal AHSCT conditioning and the characteristics of patients.

Pseudobulbar affect in neurodegenerative diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pseudobulbar affect (PBA) is characterized by uncontrolled episodes of crying and laughing which is associated with a variety of neurological diseases including traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis (MS), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), brain tumors, stroke, Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other dementias. However, there is a lack of exact estimated prevalence of PBA among neurological disorders. AIM: In this systematic review and meta-analysis study we aimed to assess the prevalence of PBA in four neurodegenerative diseases including ALS, MS, AD, and PD. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched in July 2021 for studies that reported the prevalence of PBA in ALS, MS, AD, and PD patients. The mean point of PBA prevalence and odds ratios were calculated as effect size (ES) using the random-effect model with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The summarized prevalence of PBA was of PBA in PD patients were ranged between 1% and 31% with an overall meta-analysis prevalence of 16.5% and high heterogeneity (I2: 98.7%, p: 0.000). Patients with ALS showed a PBA prevalence of 38.5%, which is higher than other neurodegenerative diseases (CI 95%: 31%-45%, I2: 61.4%, p: 0.034). Moreover, the prevalence of PBA in MS patients in the analysis was 23.3% ranging between 11% and 35% with high-level heterogeneity according to the I2 value (I2: 98.9%, p: 0.000). Also, our meta-analysis showed that the PBA prevalence in AD was 16.4% (CI 95%: 7%-25%) with high heterogeneity (I2: 97.8%, p: 0.000). CONCLUSION: This review showed that PBA is common in patients with neurodegenerative diseases including PD, AD, MS, and especially ALS. Due to the lack of proper recognition, medication and treatment would not be effective and sufficient. Therefore, it can dramatically lower the quality of life in PBA patients and decrease their social interactions.

The role of type I interferon in the treatment of COVID-19.

Although significant research has been done to find effective drugs against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), no definite effective drug exists. Thus, research has now shifted towards immunomodulatory agents other than antivirals. In this review, we aim to describe the latest findings on the role of type I interferon (IFN)-mediated innate antiviral response against SARS-CoV-2 and discuss the use of IFNs as a medication for COVID-19. A growing body of evidence has indicated a promoting active but delayed IFNs response to SARS-CoV-2 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in infected bronchial epithelial cells. Studies have demonstrated that IFNs' administration before the viral peak and the inflammatory phase of disease could offer a highly protective effect. However, IFNs' treatment during the inflammatory and severe stages of the disease causes immunopathology and long-lasting harm for patients. Therefore, it is critical to note the best time window for IFNs' administration. Further investigation of the clinical effectiveness of interferon for patients with mild to severe COVID-19 and its optimal timing and route of administration can be beneficial in finding a safe and effective antiviral therapy for the COVID-19 disease.