RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Satralizumab, a humanized anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, has been approved globally for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), based on positive results from two randomized, double-blind, phase 3 studies: SAkuraSky (NCT02028884) and SAkuraStar (NCT02073279). There remains an unmet need to understand the real-world management of NMOSD, especially in patients undergoing tapering of concomitant therapy. We examined real-world treatment patterns, including concomitant glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants, and relapse in satralizumab-treated patients with NMOSD, using a Japanese administrative hospital claims database. METHODS: We used retrospective data from the Medical Data Vision hospital-based administrative claims database. The index date was the date of first satralizumab prescription and the study period was set between August 2018 and March 2022. Patients were included in the overall population if they had a first prescription for satralizumab between August 2020 and March 2022, an International Classification of Disease, Version10 code of G36.0 prior to March 2022, and were observable for ≥90 days prior to the index date. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with relapse-free reduction of oral glucocorticoids to 0 mg/day at 360 days of continued satralizumab treatment. Secondary endpoints included time to relapse, number of relapses after the index date while being on continuous satralizumab treatment, annualized relapse rate before and after the index date, and concomitant medication use. Relapse and dose reduction were identified using definition specifically developed for this study. RESULTS: Of the 131 patients included in the overall population, most were female (90.8 %), aged 18-65 years (75.6 %), and were prescribed oral glucocorticoids (93.1 %). Azathioprine (19.1 %) and tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor (18.3 %), were the most common immunosuppressants at index date. Six (4.6 %) patients had a history of biologic use (tocilizumab, 1 [0.8 %]; eculizumab, 5 [3.8 %]). Among 111 patients observable for 360 days pre-index, there were 0.6 ± 0.8 (mean ± SD) relapses during 360 days before the index date. The median (interquartile range) duration of satralizumab exposure was 197.0 (57.0-351.0) days. Most (125/131; 95.4 %) patients were relapse-free post-index; 6 (4.6 %) patients relapsed within 90 days after the index date, of which 2 had the first relapse within 7 days after the index date. Among 21 patients with 360-day follow-up, 6 (28.6 %) patients were on 0 mg/day dose of glucocorticoid prescription without relapse 360 days post-index. Of these 6 patients, 2 had no prescription of oral glucocorticoids at the index date and remained glucocorticoid- and relapse-free 360 days after the index date. CONCLUSION: These real-world data support the phase 3 clinical trials. Our results, over a median duration of satralizumab exposure of 197.0 days, showed that a majority (125/131, 95.4 %) of patients were relapse-free after initiating satralizumab treatment. The number of glucocorticoid-free patients without relapse increased over time under continuous satralizumab prescription. Further studies are needed to confirm if satralizumab can be used as a potential immunosuppressant- and glucocorticoid-sparing agent.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Neuromielitis Óptica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Acuaporina 4 , Enfermedad Crónica , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Japón , Recurrencia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We evaluate the socioeconomic impact of treatment with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: We analysed data retrospectively from the prospective observational CorEvitas RA Japan Registry (March 2016-February 2020). Patients were categorised into paid workers (PWs) and home workers (HWs) and further based on drug classes. We assessed medication persistence, treatment outcomes, health care resource utilisation, and socioeconomic impact over 12 months, including direct (drugs and health care resource utilisation) and indirect (loss of productivity) costs. RESULTS: Overall, 187 PWs and 114 HWs were identified. Over 12 months, medication persistence was high, treatment outcomes improved, and outpatient visits reduced in both groups. Following treatment initiation, direct costs increased, whereas indirect (loss of productivity) costs decreased in both groups. The unadjusted socioeconomic impact [Japanese yen (JPY)] increased across all drug classes in PWs (range: 29,700-151,700) and HWs (range: -28,700 to 83,000). Adjusted change in monthly socioeconomic impact was JPY 29,700-138,900 for PWs and JPY -28,000 to 92,800 for HWs. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the socioeconomic burden increased across patient groups and drug classes. The decrease in indirect (loss of productivity) costs partially offset the increase in direct costs.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Humanos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Japón , Estudios Retrospectivos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
The application of nanotechnology in the health care setting has many potential benefits; however, our understanding of the interactions between nanoparticles and our immune system remains incomplete. Although many of the biological effects of nanoparticles are negatively correlated with particle size, some are clearly size specific and the mechanisms underlying these size-specific biological effects remain unknown. Here, we examined the pro-inflammatory effects of silica particles in THP-1 cells with respect to particle size; a large overall size range with narrow intervals between particle diameters (particle diameter: 10, 30, 50, 70, 100, 300, and 1,000 nm) was used. Secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1ß and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α induced by exposure to the silica particles had a bell-shaped distribution, where the maximal secretion was induced by silica nanoparticles with a diameter of 50 nm and particles with smaller or larger diameters had progressively less effect. We found that blockade of IL-1ß secretion markedly inhibited TNF-α secretion, suggesting that IL-1ß is upstream of TNF-α in the inflammatory cascade induced by exposure to silica particles, and that the induction of IL-1ß secretion was dependent on both the NLRP3 inflammasome and on uptake of the silica particles into the cells via endocytosis. However, a quantitative analysis of silica particle uptake showed that IL-1ß secretion was not correlated with the amount of silica particles taken up by the cells. Further investigation revealed that the induction of IL-1ß secretion and uptake of silica nanoparticles with diameters of 50 or 100 nm, but not of 10 or 1,000 nm, was dependent on scavenger receptor (SR) A1. In addition, of the silica particles examined, only those with a diameter of 50 nm induced strong IL-1ß secretion via activation of Mer receptor tyrosine kinase, a signal mediator of SR A1. Together, our results suggest that the SR A1-mediated pro-inflammatory response is dependent on ligand size and that both SR A1-mediated endocytosis and receptor-mediated signaling are required to produce the maximal pro-inflammatory response to exposure to silica particles.
RESUMEN
Many people suffer from metal allergy, and the recently demonstrated presence of naturally occurring metal nanoparticles in our environment could present a new candidate for inducing metal allergy. Here, we show that mice pretreated with silver nanoparticles (nAg) and lipopolysaccharides, but not with the silver ions that are thought to cause allergies, developed allergic inflammation in response to the silver. nAg-induced acquired immune responses depended on CD4(+) T cells and elicited IL-17A-mediated inflammation, similar to that observed in human metal allergy. Nickel nanoparticles also caused sensitization in the mice, whereas gold and silica nanoparticles, which are minimally ionizable, did not. Quantitative analysis of the silver distribution suggested that small nAg (≤10â nm) transferred to the draining lymph node and released ions more readily than large nAg (>10â nm). These results suggest that metal nanoparticles served as ion carriers to enable metal sensitization. Our data demonstrate a potentially new trigger for metal allergy.
Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Inflamación/inducido químicamente , Lipopolisacáridos/toxicidad , Nanopartículas del Metal/toxicidad , Plata/toxicidad , Animales , Células Cultivadas , Oído/diagnóstico por imagen , Oído/patología , Femenino , Ganglios Linfáticos/citología , Ganglios Linfáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Nanopartículas del Metal/química , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones SCID , Tamaño de la Partícula , Plata/química , Linfocitos TRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The skin is a key route of human exposure to nanomaterials, which typically occurs simultaneously with exposure to other chemical and environmental allergen. However, little is known about the hazards of nanomaterial exposure via the skin, particularly when accompanied by exposure to other substances. RESULTS: Repeated topical treatment of both ears and the shaved upper back of NC/Nga mice, which are models for human atopic dermatitis (AD), with a mixture of mite extract and silica nanoparticles induced AD-like skin lesions. Measurements of ear thickness and histologic analyses revealed that cutaneous exposure to silica nanoparticles did not aggravate AD-like skin lesions. Instead, concurrent cutaneous exposure to mite allergens and silica nanoparticles resulted in the low-level production of allergen-specific IgGs, including both the Th2-related IgG1 and Th1-related IgG2a subtypes, with few changes in allergen-specific IgE concentrations and in Th1 and Th2 immune responses. In addition, these changes in immune responses increased the sensitivity to anaphylaxis. Low-level IgG production was induced when the mice were exposed to allergen-silica nanoparticle agglomerates but not when the mice exposed to nanoparticles applied separately from the allergen or to well-dispersed nanoparticles. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that silica nanoparticles themselves do not directly affect the allergen-specific immune response after concurrent topical application of nanoparticles and allergen. However, when present in allergen-adsorbed agglomerates, silica nanoparticles led to a low IgG/IgE ratio, a key risk factor of human atopic allergies. We suggest that minimizing interactions between nanomaterials and allergens will increase the safety of nanomaterials applied to skin.