Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Asunto principal
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc ; 2018: 1400-1403, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30440654

RESUMEN

In this work, we consider the task of automatic classification of asthmatic patients and healthy subjects using voice stimuli. Cough and wheeze have been used as voice stimuli for this classification task in the past. In this work, we focus on sustained phonations, namely /aː/, /iː/, /uː/, /eɪ/, /o℧/ and compare their classification performances with the cough and wheeze. Classification experiments using 35 asthmatic patients and 36 healthy subjects show that sustained vowel /iː/ achieves the highest classification accuracy of 80.79% among five vowels considered. However, it is found to be higher and lower than the classification accuracies of 78.72% and 90.25% obtained using cough and wheeze respectively. This suggests that for speech-based asthma classification, /iː/ would be a better choice compared to other vowels considered in this work. However, when non-speech sounds are included for classification, wheeze is a better choice than sustained /iː/.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Tos , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Fonación , Ruidos Respiratorios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...