Absolute lymphocyte count as a biomarker for best supportive care transition in metastatic breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Time is crucial for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and clinicians are expected to determine the optimal timing for best supportive care (BSC) transition but no evident marker has been established. We recently revealed that absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was a prognostic marker for patients with MBC. Thus, we investigated whether ALC could be an indicator of the best timing for the BSC transition. METHODS: 101 patients with MBC were retrospectively investigated, and the relationship between clinicopathological factors, including ALC, and the duration of the last treatment was analysed. RESULTS: Mean ALC significantly gradually decreased during the last three systemic treatments towards BSC transition. Patients of younger age, with special histology type, hormone receptor-positive tumours and low ALC at the start of the last treatment had significantly shorter time-to-treatment-termination (TTT) for the last treatment. When ALC was classified into low and high, the mean TTT of the last treatment in the ALC-low group was significantly shorter (16.4 weeks) compared with that in the ALC-high group (30.2 weeks; p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that ALC values, which decrease as MBC progresses, could serve as a potential indicator for determining the optimal timing of BSC transition.

Absolute lymphocyte count decreases with disease progression and is a potential prognostic marker for metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Peripheral blood parameters such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are prognostic markers for breast cancer patients. For instance, patients with a high NLR have a poor prognosis. Meanwhile, high absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) is reportedly a predictive factor for some chemotherapies. However, the underlying mechanisms behind how these markers relate to patient outcomes and how these markers change during the clinical course of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 156 patients who were treated for MBC and eventually transitioned to best supportive care (BSC) at our hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. Changes in peripheral blood parameters during MBC treatments and their association with patient outcomes were examined. RESULTS: From the time of MBC diagnosis (baseline) through to the transition to BSC, ALC became significantly lower, while the NLR and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) became significantly higher (p < 0.001 for all). This association was independent of hormone receptor status. Cox proportional hazard modeling found patients with hormone receptor-negative and a lower baseline ALC had a significantly shorter overall survival (p = 0.030 and p = 0.019, respectively). CONCLUSION: We observed that peripheral blood markers gradually changed with MBC disease progression. Our data suggest that baseline ALC may be a potential prognostic marker after recurrence.

Factors Affecting Decisions Regarding Terminal Care Locations of Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is generally incurable, but patients can survive longer than those with other cancer types. Treatment strategies for MBC are complex, and it is difficult to establish evidence of efficacy since symptoms and patient backgrounds vary markedly. Some patients struggle to decide where to receive end-of-life care, despite palliative care intervention, and some die in unexpected places. With the aim of ascertaining the best way to intervene on behalf of patients with end-stage breast cancer, we retrospectively examined interventions provided by our palliative care team. We investigated factors influencing the decision-making processes of patients with MBC regarding end-of-life care locations and where patients actually died. METHODS: Clinical records of 44 patients with MBC, all Japanese women, who received palliative care interventions at our hospital, were retrospectively investigated. We examined factors, such as age, possibly impacting decision-making processes regarding the final location and actual place of death. RESULTS: Thirty-five (80%) patients were able to decide where to receive end-of-life care, while the others were not. For these 35 patients, desired locations were the palliative care unit (77%), home palliative care (14%), and the hospital (9%). Age and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were factors influencing patients' decision-making processes (P = .030 and .044, respectively). Of the 35 patients, 25 (71%) were able to receive end-of-life care at their desired locations. CONCLUSIONS: Young patients and those with short RFS struggled with making decisions regarding where to receive end-of-life care. Such patients might benefit from prompt introduction of advanced care planning.