Stroke Subtype Among Individuals With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Background: It is widely accepted that there is a stepwise increase in the risk of acute ischemic stroke with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, whether the risk of specific ischemic stroke subtypes varies with CKD remains unclear. Objective: To assess the association between ischemic stroke subtypes (cardioembolic, arterial, lacunar, and other) classified using the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) and CKD stage. Design: retrospective cohort study. Setting: Ontario, Canada. Patients: A total of 17 434 adults with an acute ischemic stroke in Ontario, Canada between April 1, 2002 and March 31, 2013, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurement or receipt of maintenance dialysis captured in a stroke registry were included. Measurements: Kidney function categorized as an eGFR of ≥60, 30-59, <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, or maintenance dialysis. Ischemic stroke classified by TOAST included arterial, cardioembolic, lacunar, and other (dissection, prothrombotic state, cortical vein/sinus thrombosis, and vasculitis) types of strokes. Methods: Adjusted regression models. Results: In our cohort, 58.9% had an eGFR of ≥60, 34.7% an eGFR of 30-59, 6.0% an eGFR of <30 and 0.5% were on maintenance dialysis (mean age of 73 years; 48% women). Cardioembolic stroke was more common in patients with non-dialysis-dependant CKD (eGFR 30-59: 50.4%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02, 1.44; eGFR<30: 50.6%, OR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.44), whereas lacunar stroke was less common (eGFR 30-59: 22.7% OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.93; eGFR <30: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.88) compared with those with an eGFR ≥60. In stratified analyses by age and CKD, lacunar strokes were more frequent in those aged less than 65 years, whereas cardioembolic was higher in those aged 65 years and above. Limitations: TOAST classification was not captured for all patients. Conclusion: Non-dialysis CKD was associated with a higher risk of cardioembolic stroke, whereas an eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was associated with a higher risk of lacunar stroke. Detailed stroke subtyping in CKD may therefore provide mechanistic insights and refocus treatment strategies in this high-risk population.

Contexte: Il est largement admis qu'il y a une augmentation progressive du risque d'accident vasculaire cérébral ischémique aigu en contexte d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC). On ignore cependant si le risque de certains sous-types particuliers d'AVC ischémiques varie en présence d'IRC. Objectif: Évaluer le lien entre le stade d'IRC et certains sous-types d'AVC ischémiques (cardioembolique, artériel, lacunaire et autres) classés selon l'essai TOAST (Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment). Type d'étude: Étude de cohorte retrospective. Cadre: Ontario (Canada). Sujets: Ont été inclus 17 434 adultes ayant subi un AVC ischémique aigu en Ontario (Canada) entre le 1er avril 2002 et le 31 mars 2013, et pour lesquels le registre d'AVC comportait une mesure du débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé (DFGe) ou une dialyze chronique. Mesures: La fonction rénale a été classée selon le DFGe (≥ 60 ml/min/1,73 m2 ­entre 30 et 59 ml/min/1,73 m2 ­<30 ml/min/1.73 m2) ou une dialyze chronique. Les types d'AVC ischémiques classés par l'essai TOAST comprenaient les AVC artériels, cardioemboliques, lacunaires et autres (dissection, état prothrombotique, thrombose de la veine/sinus cortical, vascularite). Méthodologie: Modèles de régression ajustés. Résultats: Dans notre cohorte (âge moyen de 73 ans; 48% de femmes), 58,9 % des patients avaient un DFGe ≥ 60 ml/min/1,73 m2; 34,7% avaient un DFGe entre 30 et 59 ml/min/1,73 m2; 6,0 % avaient un DFGe < 30 ml/min/1,73 m2 et 0,5 % des patients étaient en dialyze chronique En comparaison des patients ayant un DFGe ≥ 60 ml/min/1,73 m2, les AVC cardioemboliques étaient plus fréquents chez les patients atteints d'IRC sans dialyze (DFGe entre 30 et 59 ml/min/1,73 m2: 50,4%; rapport de cote corrigé [RCc] = 1,20; IC 95 % = 1,02-1,44­DFGe < 30 ml/min/1,73 m2: 50,6 %; RCc = 1,21; IC95% = 1,02-1,44) alors que les AVC lacunaires étaient moins fréquents [DFGe entre 30 et 59 ml/min/1,73 m2: 22,7%; RCc = 0,85; IC 95% = 0,77-0,93­DFGe < 30 ml/min/1,73 m2: RCc = 0,73; IC 95% = 0,61-0,88]. Dans les analyses stratifiées en fonction de l'âge et de l'IRC, les AVC lacunaires étaient plus fréquents chez les moins de 65 ans tandis que les AVC cardioemboliques étaient plus fréquents chez les plus de 65 ans. Limites: La classification TOAST n'était pas enregistrée pour tous les patients. Conclusion: L'IRC sans dialyze a été associée à un risque plus élevé d'AVC cardioembolique alors qu'un DFGe ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 a été associé à un risque plus élevé d'AVC lacunaire. Le sous-typage détaillé des AVC en contexte d'IRC pourrait donc fournir des informations mécanistiques et recentrer les stratégies de traitement dans cette population à haut risque.

Management of Acute Pain From Non-Low Back, Musculoskeletal Injuries : A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND: Patients and clinicians can choose from several treatment options to address acute pain from non-low back, musculoskeletal injuries. PURPOSE: To assess the comparative effectiveness of outpatient treatments for acute pain from non-low back, musculoskeletal injuries by performing a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to 2 January 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Pairs of reviewers independently identified interventional RCTs that enrolled patients presenting with pain of up to 4 weeks' duration from non-low back, musculoskeletal injuries. DATA EXTRACTION: Pairs of reviewers independently extracted data. Certainty of evidence was evaluated by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 207 eligible studies included 32 959 participants and evaluated 45 therapies. Ninety-nine trials (48%) enrolled populations with diverse musculoskeletal injuries, 59 (29%) included patients with sprains, 13 (6%) with whiplash, and 11 (5%) with muscle strains; the remaining trials included various injuries ranging from nonsurgical fractures to contusions. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) proved to have the greatest net benefit, followed by oral NSAIDs and acetaminophen with or without diclofenac. Effects of these agents on pain were modest (around 1 cm on a 10-cm visual analogue scale, approximating the minimal important difference). Regarding opioids, compared with placebo, acetaminophen plus an opioid improved intermediate pain (1 to 7 days) but not immediate pain (≤2 hours), tramadol was ineffective, and opioids increased the risk for gastrointestinal and neurologic harms (all moderate-certainty evidence). LIMITATIONS: Only English-language studies were included. The number of head-to-head comparisons was limited. CONCLUSION: Topical NSAIDs, followed by oral NSAIDs and acetaminophen with or without diclofenac, showed the most convincing and attractive benefit-harm ratio for patients with acute pain from non-low back, musculoskeletal injuries. No opioid achieved benefit greater than that of NSAIDs, and opioids caused the most harms. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Safety Council. (PROSPERO: CRD42018094412).

Predictors of Prolonged Opioid Use After Initial Prescription for Acute Musculoskeletal Injuries in Adults : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.

BACKGROUND: Opioids are frequently prescribed for acute musculoskeletal injuries and may result in long-term use and consequent harms. PURPOSE: To explore factors associated with persistent opioid use after its prescription for acute musculoskeletal injury. DATA SOURCES: Searches of multiple electronic databases, without language restrictions, from inception to 6 January 2020, and reference lists of selected articles. STUDY SELECTION: Observational studies of adults with opioid prescriptions for outpatient acute musculoskeletal injuries, in an adjusted model, that explored risk factors for prolonged use. DATA EXTRACTION: 6 reviewers, working in pairs, independently extracted data, rated the quality of studies, and evaluated the certainty of evidence. DATA SYNTHESIS: 14 cohorts with 13 263 393 participants were included. The overall prevalence of prolonged opioid use after musculoskeletal injury for high-risk populations (that is, patients receiving workers' compensation benefits, Veterans Affairs claimants, or patients with high rates of concurrent substance use disorder) was 27% (95% CI, 18% to 37%). The prevalence among low-risk populations was 6% (CI, 4% to 8%; P for interaction < 0.001). Moderate-certainty evidence showed increased odds of persistent opioid use with older age (absolute risk increase [ARI] for every 10-year increase, 1.1% [CI, 0.7% to 1.5%]) and physical comorbidity (ARI, 0.9% [CI, 0.1% to 1.7%]). Low-certainty evidence suggested increased risk for persistent opioid use with past or current substance use disorder (ARI, 10.5% [CI, 4.2% to 19.8%]), prescriptions lasting more than 7 days (median ARI, 4.5%), and higher morphine milligram equivalents per day. LIMITATION: Sparse, heterogeneous data with suboptimal adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSION: Avoiding prescribing opioids for acute musculoskeletal injuries to patients with past or current substance use disorder, and restricting duration to 7 days or less and using lower doses when they are prescribed, are potentially important targets to reduce rates of persistent opioid use. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Safety Council. (PROSPERO: CRD42018104968).

Methods for the Selection of Covariates in Nutritional Epidemiology Studies: A Meta-Epidemiological Review.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies provide important information about the effects of exposures that cannot be easily studied in clinical trials, such as nutritional exposures, but are subject to confounding. Investigators adjust for confounders by entering them as covariates in analytic models. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reporting and credibility of methods for selection of covariates in nutritional epidemiology studies. METHODS: We sampled 150 nutritional epidemiology studies published in 2007/2008 and 2017/2018 from the top 5 high-impact nutrition and medical journals and extracted information on methods for selection of covariates. RESULTS: Most studies did not report selecting covariates a priori (94.0%) or criteria for selection of covariates (63.3%). There was general inconsistency in choice of covariates, even among studies investigating similar questions. One-third of studies did not acknowledge potential for residual confounding in their discussion. CONCLUSION: Studies often do not report methods for selection of covariates, follow available guidance for selection of covariates, nor discuss potential for residual confounding.