The 16-year evolution of a military-civilian partnership: The University of Alabama at Birmingham experience.

BACKGROUND: At the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), a multi-tiered military-civilian partnership (MCP) has evolved since 2006. We aimed to outline this model to facilitate potential replication nationally. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive review of the partnership between UAB, the United States Air Force Special Operations Command, and the Department of Defense (DoD) reviewing key documents and conducting interviews with providers. As a purely descriptive study, this project did not involve any patient data acquisition or analysis and therefore was exempt from institutional review board approval per institutional policy. RESULTS: At the time of this review, six core programs existed targeting training, clinical proficiency, and research. Training: (1) The Special Operations Center for Medical Integration and Development trains up to 144 combat medics yearly. (2) UAB trains one integrated military Surgery resident yearly with two additional civilian-sponsored military residents in Emergency Medicine. (3) UAB's Surgical Critical Care Fellowship had one National Guard member with two incoming Active-Duty, one Reservist and one prior service member in August 2022. Clinical Proficiency: (4) UAB hosts four permanently assigned United States Air Force Special Operations Command Special Operations Surgical Teams composed of general surgeons, anesthesiologists, certified registered nurse anesthetists, surgical technologists, emergency physicians, critical care registered nurses, and respiratory therapists totaling 24 permanently assigned active-duty health care professionals. (5) In addition, two fellowship-trained Air Force Trauma Critical Care Surgeons, one Active-Duty and one Reservist, are permanently assigned to UAB. These clinicians participate fully and independently in the routine care of patients alongside their civilian counterparts. Research: (6) UAB's Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery is currently conducting nine DoD-funded research projects totaling $6,482,790, and four research projects with military relevance funded by other agencies totaling $15,357,191. CONCLUSION: The collaboration between UAB and various elements within the DoD illustrates a comprehensive approach to MCP. Replicating appropriate components of this model nationally may aid in the development of a truly integrated trauma system best prepared for the challenges of the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Value-based Evaluations; Level IV.

Recent advances in austere combat surgery: Use of aortic balloon occlusion as well as blood challenges by special operations medical forces in recent combat operations.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for control of noncompressible torso hemorrhage is a technology that is increasingly being utilized in the combat casualty setting. Its use in the resource restricted environment holds potential to improve hemorrhage control, decrease blood product utilization, decrease morbidity, and improve combat mortality. The objective of this report is to present the single largest series of REBOA use on severely injured combat casualties. METHODS: Over an 18-month period, austere surgical teams comprised of coalition partners provided initial damage control resuscitation (DCR) and surgical stabilization for over 2,300 combat casualties prior to transferring patients to the next level of trauma care. RESULTS: Twenty patients presented with injuries from explosion and gunshot wounds with mean initial heart rate of 129 bpm and mean initial systolic blood pressure of 71 mm Hg. Femoral cutdowns were used in six patients. Aortic occlusion was achieved with REBOA catheter placement in Zone 1 (n = 17) and Zone 3 (n = 2). Systolic blood pressure increased an average of 56 mm Hg with aortic occlusion. There were no access related site complications. All patients survived transport to the next level of care. The majority of blood products transfused in this cohort were whole blood, largely supported by emergent blood drives. CONCLUSION: This series demonstrates the potential for REBOA as a lifesaving technique for the patient who presents with hemodynamic instability and noncompressible torso hemorrhage. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta allows austere surgical teams to rapidly stabilize severely injured combat casualties, expand capability, and provide enhanced DCR while minimizing personnel, resources, and blood product utilization. The use of "whole blood only" strategy for DCR shows potential to be superior to traditional component therapy, and when combined with "proactive" REBOA utilization, provides significant improvements in hemodynamics and hemorrhage control. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, level V.