Real-world study of the efficacy and safety of belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916) in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma based on data from the nominative ATU in France: the IFM 2020-04 study.

Belantamab mafodotin (BM) is an anti-BCMA antibody-drug conjugate (GSK2857916) that represents an alternative option in multiple myeloma. We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of BM in a real-world setting in patients who benefited from an early access program. We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicenter study. Eligibility criteria were treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in monotherapy in adult patients who have received at least three lines of therapy previously, including at least one immunomodulatory agent (IMiD), a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, and whose disease progressed during the last treatment period. The primary endpoint of the study is to assess the overall survival (OS). Between November 2019 and December 2020, 106 patients were treated with BM; 97 were eligible for the efficacy evaluation and 104 for safety. The median age was 66 (range, 37-82) years. High-risk cytogenetics were identified in 40.9% of patients. Fifty-five (56.7%) patients were triple-class refractory and 11 (11.3%) were penta-class refractory. The median number of prior lines of treatment was five (range, 3-12). The median number of BM cycles administered was three (range, 1-22). The overall response rate at best response was 38.1% (37/97). The median OS was 9.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.9-15.3), and median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (95% CI: 1.9-4.7). The median duration of response was 9 months (range, 4.65-10.4). Treatment was delayed for 55 (52.9%) patients including 36.5% for treatment-related toxicity. Ophthalmic adverse events, mainly grade ≤2, were the most common toxicity (48%). The occurrence of keratopathy was 37.5%. Overall, our data are concordant with the results from DREAMM-2 in terms of efficacy and safety on a non-biased population.

The illusion of a chest wall tumor: a case-report of sternal tuberculosis.

The incidence rate of tuberculosis in developed countries is low. The most common presentation of this disease is its pulmonary form but with the increasing use of immunosuppressive drugs, extra-pulmonary tuberculosis is re-emerging. Nevertheless, sternal bone involvement is uncommon. We report the case of an eighty-three-year-old man who presented a painful sternal mass which progressed towards cutaneous ulceration. The first diagnostic hypothesis was neoplasia. The pathological and microbiological diagnosis of tuberculosis was achieved after surgical biopsy. The patient received treatment against tuberculosis for nine months enabling recovery without surgery. This case illustrates the importance of having a diagnosis prior to any kind of treatment facing any voluminous parietal thoracic lesions.  This diagnosis is made possible by surgical samples and interdisciplinary teamwork. This case underlines that tuberculosis remains a differential diagnosis that must be evoked in case of unusual bone mass.

An Innovative Biological Model for Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Access Simulation.

INTRODUCTION: Simulation training is an increasingly used method to train medical students in the use of ultrasound guidance for vascular access positioning. Although very efficient for basic training, commercial simulators for vascular access do not reproduce real-life conditions. We developed a biological training model, using porcine liver, and compared it with an existing commercial model. METHODS: Whole porcine livers were used by perfusing the portal vein system after inferior vena cava clamping. Thirty-three practitioners accustomed to ultrasound-guided procedure were enrolled to perform an ultrasound-guided vascular procedure on both biological and commercial models. Procedure duration was recorded and 10-point scales were used to compare the 2 models regarding image quality, procedure feeling, and similarity with the real-life procedure. RESULTS: Participants reported a better image quality with the biological model (8.8 ± 1 vs. 7.7 ± 2, P = 0.007) as well as a significant difference in the procedure feeling (8.0 ± 1 vs. 6.9 ± 1.9, P = 0.002). Real-life likeness was significantly better for the biological model (8.4 ± 1.1 vs. 4.5 ± 6, P < 0.0001). Procedure duration was almost 3 times longer using the biological model than the commercial model (209.6 ± 189.0 vs. 59.8 ± 50.1, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study validates our biological model of porcine's liver as an interesting training model, allowing closer real-life perception than its commercial counterpart. This model could complement and enhance simulation learning.

Evaluation of the Impact of Renal Failure on Correlation and Concordance Between 2 Free Light Chain Assays.

BACKGROUND: Free light chain (FLC) assays are essential for diagnosis and follow-up of plasma cell dyscrasia. Two assays are available: Freelite (Binding Site) and N Latex FLC (Siemens). The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of renal failure on concordance and correlation between the 2 FLC assays. METHODS: FLC measurements using both assays were performed on 1215 fresh serum samples from patients with or without monoclonal gammopathy and renal failure. Concordance and correlation were evaluated using Passing-Bablock regression, Pearson correlation coefficient, and the Cohen kappa coefficient, taking into account the renal failure stage (evaluated with Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration formulae) and evaluation of treatment response in patients' follow-up. RESULTS: A good correlation was demonstrated between both assays, irrespective of the renal failure stage (Pearson correlation coefficient > 0.90). For FLC ratio interpretation, there remained 7.6% to 20.8% discordances between the 2 methods throughout the whole range of renal impairment. To evaluate FLC evolution in patient follow-up, 41 patients were selected with at least 6 consecutive serum samples being collected during the study period: we observed a concordant evolution of FLC concentrations between both assays. However, few discrepancies were observed with 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite adjusted reference ranges for Freelite FLC ratio, there are approximately 12.5% discrepancies in interpretation of FLC ratio between the 2 available assays. They are not linked to renal failure stage and neither of the assays performed better than the other: results must be interpreted taking into account clinical data and the same assay must be used for patient follow-up.