RESUMEN
Background: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) with lymph node (LN) dissection is the standard procedure for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the tail (Pt-PDAC). However, the optimal surgery including extent of LN dissection is still being debated. The present study investigated the incidence and prognostic impact of LN metastasis on patients suffering from Pt-PDAC. Patients and method: This multicenter, retrospective study involved 163 patients who underwent DP for resectable Pt-PDAC at 12 institutions between 2013 and 2017. The frequency of LN metastasis and the effect of LN dissection on Pt-PDAC prognosis were investigated. Results: There were high incidences of metastases to the LNs along the splenic artery in the patients with Pt-PDAC (39%). The rate of metastases in the LNs along the common hepatic, left gastric, and celiac arteries were low, and the therapeutic index for these LNs was zero. In pancreatic tail cancer located more distally, there were no metastases to the LNs along the common hepatic artery. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size was the only independent factor related to recurrence-free survival (HR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.33-3.05, p = 0.001). The level of pancreas division and LN dissection along the common hepatic artery did not affect the site of tumor recurrence or recurrence-free survival. Conclusions: LN dissection along the hepatic artery for Pt-PDAC has little significance. Distal pancreatic transection may be acceptable in terms of oncological safety, but further examination of short-term outcomes and preservation of pancreatic function is required.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) is an uncommon proliferative histiocytic disorder involving lymph nodes and various organs. Forty-three percent of RDD cases originate from extranodal sites; however, RDD rarely arises from the colon. CASE PRESENTATION: A 75-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of intra-abdominal masses that were incidentally detected during surveillance by computed tomography (CT) after treatment for lung cancer. Enhanced CT showed two mass lesions located in the cecum to the appendix (diameter, 40 mm) and around the sigmoid colon (diameter, 24 mm). Positron emission tomography (PET)-CT revealed an apparent uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose. Intraluminal endoscopy did not reveal definite mucosal abnormalities. These findings suggest the presence of malignant neoplasms including gastrointestinal stromal tumors, lung cancer metastasis, and malignant lymphoma. Exploratory laparoscopy and/or tumor excision were planned to obtain a definitive diagnosis. Based on laparoscopic findings, ileocecal resection and sigmoidectomy were simultaneously performed to excise the tumors. Postoperative histopathological examination revealed multiple RDD originating from the mesocolon side of the cecum and the sigmoid colon. The patient did not receive any adjuvant therapy. No recurrence was observed one year after surgery. CONCLUSION: RDD originating from the colon is extremely rare. Tumor extirpation or organ resection is sometimes required to obtain a definitive diagnosis of RDD, and minimally invasive surgery is helpful.
RESUMEN
Telesurgery is expected to improve medical access in areas with limited resources, facilitate the rapid dissemination of new surgical procedures, and advance surgical education. While previously hindered by communication delays and costs, recent advancements in information technology and the emergence of new surgical robots have created an environment conducive to societal implementation. In Japan, the legal framework established in 2019 allows for remote surgical support under the supervision of an actual surgeon. The Japan Surgical Society led a collaborative effort, involving various stakeholders, to conduct social verification experiments using telesurgery, resulting in the development of a Japanese version of the "Telesurgery Guidelines" in June 2022. These guidelines outline requirements for medical teams, communication environments, robotic systems, and security measures for communication lines, as well as responsibility allocation, cost burden, and the handling of adverse events during telesurgery. In addition, they address telementoring and full telesurgery. The guidelines are expected to be revised as needed, based on the utilization of telesurgery, advancements in surgical robots, and improvements in information technology.
Asunto(s)
Sociedades Médicas , Telemedicina , Japón , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/normas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Tecnología de la Información , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Cirugía General/educaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: New platforms for robotic surgery have recently become available for clinical use; however, information on the introduction of new surgical robotic platforms compared with the da Vinci™ surgical system is lacking. In this study, we retrospectively determined the safe introduction of the new "hinotori™" surgical robot in an institution with established da Vinci surgery using four representative digestive organ operations. METHODS: Sixty-one patients underwent robotic esophageal, gastric, rectal, and pancreatic operations using the hinotori system in our department in 2023. Among these, 22 patients with McKeown esophagectomy, 12 with distal gastrectomy, 11 with high- and low-anterior resection of the rectum, and eight with distal pancreatectomy procedures performed by hinotori were compared with historical controls treated using da Vinci surgery. RESULTS: The console (cockpit) operation time for distal gastrectomy and rectal surgery was shorter in the hinotori group compared with the da Vinci procedure, and there were no significant differences in the console times for the other two operations. Other surgical results were almost similar between the two robot surgical groups. Notably, the console times for hinotori surgeries showed no significant learning curves, determined by the cumulative sum method, for any of the operations, with similar values to the late phase of da Vinci surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that no additional learning curve might be required to achieve proficient surgical outcomes using the new hinotori surgical robotic platform, compared with the established da Vinci surgery.
Asunto(s)
Tempo Operativo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Gastrectomía/métodos , Gastrectomía/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/instrumentación , Curva de Aprendizaje , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Pancreatectomía/instrumentación , Esofagectomía/métodos , Esofagectomía/instrumentación , AdultoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using an Endoscope Manipulator Robot (EMARO). METHODS: This retrospective study included 51 patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. The transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP) has been used to treat inguinal hernias. The patients were divided into two groups: one group underwent laparoscopic surgery using EMARO (E-TAPP) and the other group underwent conventional laparoscopic surgery (L-TAPP). The EMARO is a pneumatically driven endoscope-holder robot. The surgical outcomes of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent E-TAPP, and 36 underwent L-TAPP. The L-TAPP operation requires two personnel, whereas E-TAPP can be performed by one surgeon. The median operation times of the E-TAPP and L-TAPP groups were 81 min (range, 77-87) and 70 min (range, 60-94), respectively, and the median blood loss was 5 mL (range, 1-5) and 2 mL (range, 1-5). However, these differences were not statistically significant. The setup time for EMARO was approximately 8 min (range, 5-12). No patient experienced recurrence, and the postoperative complication rates were similar between the two groups. The number of patients who used postoperative analgesics in the E-TAPP and L-TAPP groups was four (n = 15) and 22 (n = 36), respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery using EMARO can reduce labor costs and postoperative pain. The surgical outcomes of the E-TAPP group were not inferior to those of the L-TAPP group, and E-TAPP could also be safely performed.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía , Tempo Operativo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Anciano , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiologíaAsunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural , Neoplasias del Colon , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Músculos Abdominales , Analgesia Epidural/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
A 75-year-old man was referred to our department because of an enlarging intrahepatic mass detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up for another disease. MRI showed hypointensity on T1-weighted imaging and hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging in liver segment 4. Abdominal plain computed tomography (CT) indicated a low-density lesion with an unclear boundary, measuring approximately 4 cm × 3 cm in liver segment 4. Dynamic CT showed early rim enhancement and gradual central enhancement. Contrast-enhanced CT also showed occlusion of the portal vein in segment 4. As the possibility of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma could not be excluded on imaging studies, we performed laparoscopic left medial sectionectomy. Histologically, the lesion showed diminished numbers of hepatocytes with increased collagen fibers compared with normal, with no patent portal vein. We considered this lesion a reactive lesion caused by collapse of the liver parenchyma owing to localized obstruction and loss of the portal vein. This lesion was pathologically diagnosed as portal biliopathy. We experienced an extremely rare case of intrahepatic mass-forming portal biliopathy that mimicked a hepatic tumor, which was diagnosed by laparoscopic resection. Portal biliopathy rarely forms intrahepatic mass lesions and must be distinguished from a malignant hepatic tumor.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos , Colangiocarcinoma , Vena Porta , Humanos , Masculino , Colangiocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Colangiocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Anciano , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos/patología , Vena Porta/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Porta/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Imagen por Resonancia MagnéticaRESUMEN
Numerous potentially curative treatments have become available for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on the basis of the individual patient and tumor characteristics. Carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) is a novel treatment option to reduce the physical burden in patients with HCC. However, the long-term outcomes and the clinical and pathological features of locoregional recurrence after initial C-ion RT are unclear. The present study reports the case of a patient who underwent a curative laparoscopic liver resection for the local recurrence of HCC after C-ion RT. A 73-year-old man was diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C and achieved a sustained virological response. During subsequent surveillance, a solitary HCC of 2.3 cm in diameter appeared in liver segment 7 (S7). While surgical resection was considered the best option, the patient chose C-ion RT as the initial HCC treatment. Although C-ion RT appeared to be successful for the primary lesion, enhanced computed tomography revealed that a hypervascular tumor had reappeared in the same area 16 months later. As HCC recurrence was suspected, several different examinations were performed. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed that the recurrent tumor had irregular margins, and communication was suspected with the intrahepatic portal vein. A laparoscopic partial liver resection of S7 was planned. Histopathological examination of the excised specimen revealed proliferation of viable moderately to poorly differentiated HCC, with marked invasive growth and numerous portal vein infiltrations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of surgery for locally recurrent HCC after C-ion RT. Oncological outcomes following C-ion RT for HCC remain unclear. Notably, there are cases of unusual recurrence with massive vascular invasion after C-ion RT. In the present case, the histological features were confirmed after C-ion RT for HCC. This case may raise concerns about the true efficacy of C-ion RT and warns against the easy choice of C-ion RT in spite of a resectable HCC.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Robotic pancreatectomy has been performed worldwide mainly using the da Vinci® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Recently, because of the death of some patents related to the da Vinci® system, new surgical robot systems have been introduced that are characterized by unique technical refinements. In Japan, the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System (Medicaroid Corporation, Kobe, Japan) was approved for use in gastroenterological surgery in October 2022. Since then, we have attempted complicated procedures using this robot. In this report, we report our first experience performing spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein using this first Japanese domestic surgical robot. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 58-year-old woman with a mass in the pancreatic tail identified during medical screening. Further examinations resulted in a diagnosis of a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. The patient consented to surgical resection, and we planned robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein, using the hinotori™. Five trocars, including one port for the assistant surgeon, were placed in the upper abdomen. The operating unit was rolled in from the patient's right side. The pivot position was set for each robotic arm, and this setting was specific to the hinotori™. The cockpit surgeon performed all surgical procedures, excluding port placement and pancreatic transection. There were no unrecoverable device errors during the operation. The operation time was 531 min, and blood loss was 192 ml. The postoperative course was uneventful. We were able to safely perform this highly complicated surgery for a pancreatic tumor using the first Japanese domestic surgical robot platform. CONCLUSIONS: The first Japanese domestic surgical robot platform, hinotori™, has different features from those of the da Vinci® and performed sufficiently as a surgical robot system in highly advanced pancreatic surgery.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a safe, effective, and promising analgesic procedure, but TAP block only cannot overcome postoperative pain. We conducted a prospective randomized study to evaluate postoperative pain control using multimodal analgesia (MA) combined with a single injection TAP block compared with epidural analgesia (EA) after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colon cancer surgery were enrolled in this study and randomized into EA and MA groups. The primary endpoint was the frequency of additional analgesic use until postoperative day (POD) 2. The VAS score, blood pressure, time to bowel movement, time to mobilization, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (EA group, n = 33; MA group, n = 31) were analyzed. The patient characteristics did not differ markedly between the two groups. The frequency of additional analgesic use was significantly lower in the MA group than in the EA group (P < 0.001), whereas the VAS score did not differ markedly between the two groups. The postoperative blood pressure on the day of surgery was significantly lower in the MA group than in the EA group (P = 0.016), whereas urinary retention was significantly higher in the EA group than in the MA group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: MA combined with a single injection TAP block after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery may be comparable to EA in terms of analgesia and superior to EA in terms of urinary retention.