Characterization of intestinal and pancreatic dysfunction in VPAC1-null mutant mouse.

OBJECTIVES: These studies examined the effect of homozygous deletion of vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor type 1 (VPAC1) on development and function of intestines and pancreas. METHODS: Genetically engineered VPAC1-null mutant mice were monitored for growth, development, and glucose homeostasis. Expression of VPAC1 was examined during embryonic development using VPAC1 promoter-driven ß-galactosidase transgenic mice. RESULTS: Homozygous deletion of VPAC1 resulted in fetal, neonatal, and postweaning death owing to failure to thrive, intestinal obstruction, and hypoglycemia. Histological findings demonstrated disorganized hyperproliferation of intestinal epithelial cells with mucus deposition and bowel wall thickening. The pancreas demonstrated small dysmorphic islets of Langerhans containing α, ß, and δ cells. Expression of a VPAC1 promoter-driven transgene was observed in E12.5 and E14.5 intestinal epithelial and pancreatic endocrine cells. Vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor type 1-null mutant animals had lower baseline blood glucose levels compared to both heterozygous and wild-type littermates. Vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor type 1-deficient mice responded to oral glucose challenge with normal rise in blood glucose followed by rapid hypoglycemia and failure to restore baseline glucose levels. Insulin challenge resulted in profound hypoglycemia and inadequate glucose homeostasis in VPAC1-null mutant animals. CONCLUSIONS: These observations support a role for VPAC1 during embryonic and neonatal development of intestines and endocrine pancreas.

In vitro modeling of the clinical interactions between octreotide and 111In-pentetreotide: is there evidence of somatostatin receptor downregulation?

UNLABELLED: Some authors have suggested that chronic octreotide use enhances the efficiency of radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (sst) imaging. Conversely, desensitization of sst on tumor tissue (tachyphylaxis) may occur occasionally in patients on chronic octreotide therapy. Assuming that chronic exposure to octreotide induces tachyphylaxis, we hypothesized that chronic exposure of sst subtype 2 (sst2)-expressing cells to octreotide would downregulate binding of 111In-pentetreotide to sst and that this downregulation would be due to a reduction in the gene copy number for sst2. METHODS: The clinical scenarios of acute (24 h) and chronic (2 wk) octreotide use, followed by either nuclear imaging exposure (8.6 pmol/L) or therapeutic exposure (510 pmol/L) to (111)In-pentetreotide, were modeled in vitro. Receptor binding in IMR-32 human neuroblastoma cells (high sst2 expression) and PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer cells (no detectable sst2 expression) was evaluated. Gene copy numbers for sst subtypes 1-5 in IMR-32 cells were determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Acute or chronic octreotide exposure at low or high doses did not significantly alter sst2 gene copy numbers or binding of either the diagnostic dose or the therapeutic dose of 111In-pentetreotide. CONCLUSION: In vitro exposure of cells to low or high doses of octreotide for 1-14 d does not result in the development of either tachyphylaxis or upregulation of sst as assessed by changes in gene expression or in high-affinity binding.