SURVEY OF KEY RADIATION SAFETY PRACTICES IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY: AN IRISH AND ENGLISH STUDY.

Interventional radiology is a rapidly evolving speciality with potential to deliver high patient radiation doses, as a result high standards of radiation safety practice are imperative. IR radiation safety practice must be considered before during and after procedures through appropriate patient consent, dose monitoring and patient follow-up. This questionnaire-based study surveyed fixed IR departments across Ireland and England to establish clinical practice in relation to radiation safety. Pre-procedure IR patient consent includes all radiation effects in 11% of cases. The patient skin dose surrogate parameter of Kerma to air at a reference point (Kar) is under-reported. Only 39% of respondents use a substantial radiation dose level and inform patients after these have been reached. Poor compliance with unambiguous, readily available best practice guidance was observed throughout highlighting patient communication, patient dose quantification and subsequent patient dose management concerns.

Iterative reconstruction and automatic tube voltage selection reduce clinical CT radiation doses and image noise.

INTRODUCTION: Computed Tomography (CT) use has increased in recent years with trends indicating increasing population doses as a result. Optimization of clinical radiation doses through technological developments has demonstrated potential to reduce patient dose from CT. This study aimed to quantify these dose reductions across a large clinical cohort. METHODS: Patient cohort was divided into three groups, assigned by CT optimisation technique. Group one underwent scanning with automated tube current modulation only. Group two underwent scanning with automated tube current modulation and iterative reconstruction and group three underwent scanning with automated tube current modulation, iterative reconstruction and automatic tube voltage modulation. Patient dose length product doses were retrospectively collected for the three groups. Clinical radiation doses between the groups were compared for four common CT examinations (Brain, pulmonary angiography, abdomen and thorax abdomen pelvis scans). RESULTS: Of 4011 patients, group one comprised of 1643 patients (40.96%), group two 1077 patients (26.85%) and group three 1291 patients (32.19%). No differences were found when comparing AP diameter between groups (p ≥ 0.05). Statistically significant dose reductions of 16-31% were achieved using iterative reconstruction alone (p = 0.001) and 24-42% with both iterative reconstruction and automatic tube voltage selection (p = 0.001). Objective noise improved when iterative reconstruction was used (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The application of optimization software confers significant dose savings during routine clinical CT examinations. Figures are based on a large clinical cohort, with equipment, staff and procedural protocols remaining consistent throughout. Dose reductions are likely to reflect the clinical dose reducing potential of the optimization software investigated.

Investigation of reference levels and radiation dose associated with abdominal EVAR (endovascular aneurysm repair) procedures across several European Centres.

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is considered the treatment of choice for abdominal aortic aneurysms with suitable anatomy. In order to improve radiation safety, European Directive (2013/59) requires member states to implement diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in radio-diagnostic and interventional procedures. This study aimed to determine local DRLs for EVAR across five European centres and identify an interim European DRL, which currently remains unestablished. METHODS: Retrospective data was collected for 180 standard EVARs performed between January 2014 and July 2015 from five specialist centres in Ireland (n=2) and Italy (n=3). Data capture included: air kerma-area product (PKA), total air kerma at the reference point (Ka,r), fluoroscopic time (FT), number of acquisitions, frame rate of acquisition, type of acquisition, patient height, weight, and gender. RESULTS: The mean values for each site A, B, C, D, and E were: PKAs of 4343 ± 994 µGym2, 18,200 ± 2141 µGym2, 11,423 ± 1390 µGym2, 7796 ± 704 µGym2, 31,897 ± 5798 µGym2; FTs of 816 ± 92 s, 950 ± 150 s, 708 ± 70 s, 972 ± 61 s, 827 ± 118 s; and number of acquisitions of 6.72 ± 0.56, 10.38 ± 1.54, 4.74 ± 0.19, 5.64 ± 0.36, 7.28 ± 0.65, respectively. The overall pooled 75th percentile PKA was 15,849 µGym2. CONCLUSION: Local reference levels were identified. The pooled data has been used to establish an interim European DRL for EVAR procedures. KEY POINTS: • Abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) requires the use of ionising radiation. • EVAR is a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. • Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are used to monitor patient radiation exposure. • Radiation dose data was collected from five European centres for EVAR procedures. • Local DRLs have been determined and an interim European DRL is proposed.