Dietary Choline Supplements, but Not Eggs, Raise Fasting TMAO Levels in Participants with Normal Renal Function: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Choline is a dietary precursor to the gut microbial generation of the prothrombotic and proatherogenic metabolite trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO). Eggs are rich in choline, yet the impact of habitual egg consumption on TMAO levels and platelet function in human subjects remains unclear. METHODS: Healthy volunteers (41% male, 81% Caucasian, median age 28 years) with normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate >60) were recruited and assigned to 1 of 5 daily interventions for 4 weeks: 1) hardboiled eggs (n = 18); 2) choline bitartrate supplements (n = 20); 3) hardboiled eggs + choline bitartrate supplements (n = 16); 4) egg whites + choline bitartrate supplements (n = 18); 5) phosphatidylcholine supplements (n = 10). Fasting blood and urine samples were collected for quantification of TMAO, its precursors, and platelet aggregometry. RESULTS: Participants' plasma TMAO levels increased significantly in all 3 intervention arms containing choline bitartrate (all P < .0001), but daily ingestion of 4 large eggs (P = .28) or phosphatidylcholine supplements (P = .27) failed to increase plasma TMAO levels. Platelet reactivity also significantly increased in the 3 intervention arms containing choline bitartrate (all P < .01), but not with eggs (P = .10) or phosphatidylcholine supplements (P = .79). CONCLUSIONS: Despite high choline content in egg yolks, healthy participants consuming 4 eggs daily showed no significant increase in TMAO or platelet reactivity. However, choline bitartrate supplements providing comparable total choline raised both TMAO and platelet reactivity, demonstrating that the form and source of dietary choline differentially contributes to systemic TMAO levels and platelet responsiveness.

Comparison of the secretin stimulated endoscopic pancreatic function test to retrograde pancreatogram.

Duodenal intubation techniques with hormonal stimulation are the most accurate at diagnosing early chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatography (ERCP), the radiologic gold standard, can accurately diagnose chronic pancreatitis, but is expensive, may expose the patient to radiation, and/or induce acute pancreatitis. We have developed an endoscopic pancreatic function test (ePFT) that can assess pancreatic secretory function during upper endoscopy. We sought to determine the accuracy of the endoscopic secretin pancreatic function test using retrograde pancreatogram as the gold standard. Patients referred to The Pancreas Clinic for the evaluation and management of chronic abdominal pain and suspected chronic pancreatitis who had both endoscopic function testing and pancreatic duct imaging (ERCP) were studied. Pancreatograms were scored for duct morphologic characteristics (Cambridge classification) and compared to peak bicarbonate concentration in secretin stimulated duodenal juice. The ePFT consisted of a test dose of intravenous synthetic porcine secretin (0.2 microg), full-dose intravenous secretin (0.2 microg/kg) over 1 min, (3) upper endoscopy with moderate sedation, (4) gastric fluid aspirated and discarded, (5) duodenal fluid aspirations at 0, 15, 45, and 60 min after secretin injection, and (6) fluid analysis with lab autoanalyzer for bicarbonate concentration (historical normal cutpoint >80 mEq/L). Thirty-six patients had both the endoscopic function test and ERCP. Seventeen had chronic abdominal pain with normal pancreatograms, and nineteen had chronic abdominal pain with abnormal pancreatograms, consistent with chronic pancreatitis. The sensitivity and specificity of the endoscopic function test were 94% and 79%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 80% and 94%, respectively. Overall agreement with ERCP was 86%. The ePFT with synthetic porcine secretin has excellent correlation with abnormal pancreatogram (chronic pancreatitis). Furthermore, a normal bicarbonate (negative function test, HCO(3) >80 mEq/L) essentially rules out chronic pancreatitis as a diagnostic cause of abdominal pain. Endoscopic pancreatic function testing may decrease the need for ERCP in patients with chronic abdominal pain.

The effect of moderate sedation on exocrine pancreas function in normal healthy subjects: a prospective, randomized, cross-over trial using the synthetic porcine secretin stimulated Endoscopic Pancreatic Function Test (ePFT).

BACKGROUND: We have developed a purely endoscopic collection method for the assessment of pancreatic secretory function (ePFT). The pancreatic secretory effects of sedation medications utilized during endoscopic procedures are not completely known. AIMS: To study the effect of moderate sedation on the exocrine pancreas gland in a prospective, randomized trial. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were randomized by computers to one of two treatments (A-no sedation, B-sedation) in period 1 and crossed-over to the other treatment in period 2 with a minimal washout interval of 7 days. Sedation dosage was standardized for each patient based on age, gender and weight from a previously published dosing nomogram. Synthetic porcine secretin (ChiRhoClin, Inc., Burtonsville, Maryland) was used as the pancreatic stimulant. Duodenal fluid samples were aspirated via the endoscope every 5 min for 1 h and sent on ice to our hospital laboratory for the measurement of pancreatic secretory electrolyte concentrations by autoanalyzer. RESULTS: A total of 17 healthy volunteers were enrolled. Sixteen subjects (8 males and 8 females) completed the randomized prospective trial. Median intravenous meperidine and midazolam sedation dose was 62.5 mg and 2.5 mg, respectively. Maximum pancreatic juice flow occurred during the early phase of secretion and maximum bicarbonate concentration occurred during the late phase of secretion. Analysis of the electrolyte composition of the endoscopically collected duodenal drainage fluid revealed a constant cation concentration for both sodium and potassium over the 1 h collection period. The anions, chloride and bicarbonate, exhibited a reciprocal relationship identical to that seen in traditional gastroduodenal tube collection studies. There was no statistical difference observed between the sedation and no sedation groups. The estimated total bicarbonate output (area under curve, AUC) for the sedated and non-sedated groups were 5,017 meq + 724 (range 3,663-6,173) and 5,364 meq +/- 583 (range 4,323-6563) respectively (p= 0.0656). The mean peak bicarbonate concentrations for sedated (n = 8) versus non-sedated (n = 8) groups were 103 +/- 11 meq/L (range 78-125) and 106 +/- 11 meq/L (range 87-138), respectively (p= 0.1346). There was excellent correlation of peak bicarbonate concentrations when sedation and no sedation groups were compared (r= 0.744, p < 0.05; Spearman rank correlation). There were no episodes of pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: (a) Moderate sedation used for upper endoscopy does not effect the clinical diagnostic parameters (peak bicarbonate concentration or total bicarbonate output) utilized to diagnose pancreatic insufficiency. (b) Analysis of duodenal drainage fluid collected endoscopically after synthetic secretin stimulation produces an identical pancreatic secretory curve described with traditional gastroduodenal tube collection methods.

An endoscopic pancreatic function test with synthetic porcine secretin for the evaluation of chronic abdominal pain and suspected chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic function tests are the most reliable methods for the diagnosis or exclusion of chronic pancreatitis in patients without obvious radiologic changes, but they are cumbersome, time consuming, and unavailable in clinical practice. Synthetic porcine secretin, a 27 amino acid peptide identical to the biologic form, is available for exocrine function testing. This study examined the utility of a simple, newly developed, purely endoscopic pancreatic function test with synthetic porcine secretin. METHODS: Three groups of patients were studied: patients with chronic abdominal pain with and without risk factors for chronic pancreatitis, and patients with advanced chronic pancreatitis. All patients with abdominal pain had "pancreatic type" pain for greater than 6 months and negative radiographic imaging studies. All patients with chronic pancreatitis had advanced disease based on retrograde pancreatography and/or CT findings. Participants underwent the following protocol: (1) standard endoscopy to the descending duodenum with the patient under conscious sedation; (2) intravenous administration of secretin (0.2 microgram/kg); (3) endoscopic duodenal fluid collection at 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after secretin injection; and (4) fluid analysis for bicarbonate concentration. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were studied (5 abdominal pain without risk factors, 7 abdominal pain with risk factors, and 6 advanced chronic pancreatitis). Median peak (interquartile range) bicarbonate concentrations in meq/L for each group were, respectively, 87 (6, range 84-108), 72 (10, range 68-90), and 35 (27, range 18-88). Median peak bicarbonate concentration values for the 3 groups are significantly different (p = 0.010; Kruskal-Wallis test). Bicarbonate secretion in patients with chronic pancreatitis was markedly reduced compared with that in patients with abdominal pain without risk factors (p = 0.038; the Fisher exact test). The secretory function curve for patients with abdominal pain with risk factors was markedly abnormal, resembling the attenuated secretory curve seen in patients with chronic pancreatitis. The test was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: A simple endoscopic pancreatic function test with synthetic porcine secretin appears to distinguish patients with known chronic pancreatitis from those with chronic abdominal pain without chronic pancreatitis. This simple, practical endoscopic test can be performed during upper endoscopy and may decrease the need for invasive procedures in patients with abdominal pain and normal radiographic imaging studies.

An endoscopic pancreatic function test with cholecystokinin-octapeptide for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Current pancreatic function tests are cumbersome and unavailable to the clinical gastroenterologist. We have developed a function test that can be modified to a purely endoscopic collection method (ePFT). The aim of this study was to compare the endoscopic and traditional Dreiling tube collection methods. METHODS: Two separate groups of healthy subjects and patients with chronic pancreatitis underwent pancreatic function testing. One group underwent the endoscopic collection method (ePFT). Intravenous cholecystokinin (CCK 40 ng x kg(-1) x h(-1)) was started in preprocedure area. Duodenal fluid was collected with upper endoscope during endoscopy at 30, 40, 50, and 60 minutes during infusion. Another group underwent the traditional Dreiling collection method. Intravenous CCK was started in postprocedure area after endoscopic tube placement. Duodenal fluid was collected at 0, 20, 40, 60, and 80 minutes during infusion. Lipase concentration was determined (IU/L) on laboratory autoanalyzer. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were studied. Thirty-four underwent endoscopic collection and 39 underwent Dreiling collection. The mean peak lipase concentrations (+/- standard deviation) for healthy subjects and patients with chronic pancreatitis in the endoscopic collection method group were 1612500 +/- 556152 IU/L and 369594 +/- 281624 IU/L, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean peak lipase concentrations (+/- standard deviation) for healthy subjects and patients with chronic pancreatitis in the Dreiling tube collection method group were 1670324 +/- 786731 IU/L and 478956 +/- 406061 IU/L, respectively (P < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between collection methods at distinguishing healthy subjects and patients with chronic pancreatitis. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) for the endoscopic and Dreiling collection methods were 0.993 (standard error of mean, 0.009) and 0.921 (standard error of mean, 0.041). A lipase concentration cut point of 810600 IU/L distinguishes healthy subjects from patients with chronic pancreatitis with a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 95%, respectively. The ePFT was safe, short in duration, minimized costs (US dollars 1890 vs. US dollars 2659), required small amounts of fluid for analysis (1-3 mL), and eliminated radiation exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of timed endoscopic aspirations of pancreatic juice after hormonal stimulation can distinguish healthy subjects from patients with chronic pancreatitis. This new endoscopic collection method (ePFT) is less cumbersome and more time efficient, when compared to traditional collection methods. The ePFT broadens the availability of function testing to the practicing clinical gastroenterologist.

Analysis of duodenal drainage fluid after cholecystokinin (CCK) stimulation in healthy volunteers.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Hormonal stimulatory agents are used to assess pancreatic function. Biologically derived secretin, the most widely used pancreatic secretagogue, is no longer available in the United States. Existing secretory tests using cholecystokinin alone are cumbersome, requiring a unique dual tube (gastric and duodenal) collection system and constant perfusion of a nonabsorbable marker to calculate enzyme output (in international units [IU]). A simpler, quantitative cholecystokinin stimulation test that measures enzyme concentrations (in international units per liter [IU/L]) instead of total output would obviate need for marker perfusion/collection. The aim of our experiment was to study the secretory patterns of pancreatic enzyme concentration in duodenal fluid after cholecystokinin stimulation in healthy volunteers. METHODOLOGY: Healthy subjects had a Dreiling tube inserted endoscopically into the ligament of Treitz. Gastric and duodenal aspiration ports were connected to low intermittent suction. A 20-minute baseline was obtained to clear the gastric and duodenal lumina of residual fluid. Cholecystokinin was infused at a constant rate of 40 ng/kg per hour. Duodenal fluid was collected on ice for 80 minutes in four 20-minute aliquots. Aspirated fluid was analyzed for enzyme concentration with an automated chemistry analyzer in the hospital biochemistry laboratory. RESULTS: Nineteen healthy volunteers were studied. The mean volume (+/-SEM) of duodenal fluid collected was 85 +/- 4.4 mL (range, 48 to 118 mL). Fluid analysis revealed a significant rise in mean lipase concentration (+/-SEM) from a baseline of 595,680 +/- 11,930 IU/L to a peak of 1,778,847 +/- 171,204 IU/L (mean difference = 1,183,167 IU/L; 95% CI= 664,459 IU/L to 1,701,875 IU/L; < 0.001, Student test). Increases in amylase concentrations were markedly less pronounced and did not reach statistical significance. Mean peak lipase concentration occurred within 50 minutes of acinar cell stimulation. All patients tolerated tube placement, and there were no episodes of acute pancreatitis or abdominal pain. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic lipase concentrations in duodenal fluid increase nearly threefold after cholecystokinin stimulation in healthy volunteers. This magnitude of enzyme secretory response may be a marker of pancreatic function and could potentially lead to a more clinically useful and simpler pancreatic function test. This physiologic study serves as the basis for our further investigations of cholecystokinin-stimulated lipase concentrations as a new test in the assessment of pancreatic insufficiency.