Isotonic is better than hypotonic saline for intravenous rehydration of children with gastroenteritis: a prospective randomised study.

AIMS: To determine whether the risk of hyponatraemia in children with gastroenteritis receiving intravenous (IV) fluids is decreased by the use of 0.9% saline. METHODS: A prospective randomised study was carried out in a tertiary paediatric hospital. A total of 102 children with gastroenteritis were randomised to receive either 0.9% saline + 2.5% dextrose (NS) or 0.45% saline + 2.5% dextrose (N/2) at a rate determined by their treating physician according to hospital guidelines and clinical judgement. Plasma electrolytes, osmolality, and plasma glucose were measured before (T(0)) and 4 hours after (T(4)) starting IV fluids, and subsequently if clinically indicated. Electrolytes and osmolality were measured in urine samples. Results were analysed according to whether children were hyponatraemic (plasma sodium <135 mmol/l) or normonatraemic at T(0). RESULTS: At T(0), mean (SD) plasma sodium was 135 (3.3) mmol/l (range 124-142), with 37/102 (36%) hyponatraemic. At T(4), mean plasma sodium in children receiving N/2 remained unchanged in those initially hyponatraemic (n = 16), but fell 2.3 (2.2) mmol/l in the normonatraemic group. In contrast, among children receiving NS, mean plasma sodium was 2.4 (2.0) mmol/l higher in those hyponatraemic at baseline (n = 21) and unchanged in the initially normonatraemic children. In 16 children who were still receiving IV fluids at 24 hours, 3/8 receiving N/2 were hyponatraemic compared with 0/8 receiving NS. No child became hypernatraemic. CONCLUSIONS: In gastroenteritis treated with intravenous fluids, normal saline is preferable to hypotonic saline because it protects against hyponatraemia without causing hypernatraemia.

Child and parent satisfaction with the use of spacer devices in acute asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate child and parent satisfaction with the use of spacers in acute asthma. METHODS: All parents of children presenting to the emergency department of Sydney Children's Hospital over a 3-month period with mild to moderately severe acute asthma who were treated with bronchodilators by spacer device were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire. Children aged 8 years and older completed a separate questionnaire independently. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven of 158 parents (70%) responded. The majority (84%) found it 'easy' or 'very easy' to use the spacer and 85% reported that they intended to use the spacer at home. Of those parents who had previously used a nebulizer (n = 73), 84% said that the spacer was easier to use, 77% said that the spacer was better tolerated by their child and 84% said that overall they preferred the spacer. Seventeen of 31 children aged 8-14 years treated with a spacer (55%) responded to the satisfaction survey. All respondents found it 'easy' or 'OK' to use the spacer and the majority (82%) 'liked it' or thought 'it was OK'. The majority of children (82%) said that they preferred using spacers because it was quicker (29%) or easier to use (53%). CONCLUSION: The use of spacer devices in mild to moderately severe acute asthma is highly acceptable for children and parents; the majority prefer this mode of drug delivery to nebulization.

Evaluating the effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines for the use of spacer devices in children with acute asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To change standard practice from using nebulisers to metered dose inhalers and holding chambers (spacers) in children presenting with mild to moderate acute asthma. DESIGN: A before-after comparison of children with acute asthma presenting to the emergency department (ED) between August and October 1999 with those presenting between June and August 1997. SETTING: A tertiary care metropolitan children's hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for using spacers were developed by a local multidisciplinary consensus process. A multifaceted guideline implementation program was used in 1999. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physician prescribing practices (spacer use); clinical outcomes (need for hospitalisation, admission to intensive care unit, and length of stay [LOS]). RESULTS: 75 of 247 children (30%; 95% CI, 25%-36%) required hospital admission in 1999. This was similar to the 1997 study period, when 95 of 326 (29%; 95% CI, 24%-34%) children were admitted. Of those with mild to moderate asthma, 160 (68%) received bronchodilators in the ED; 151 (94%) were initially treated with a spacer device in 1999. In 1997, no children were initially treated with spacers in the ED. The median (range) LOS in hospital for children with asthma of all severities was 1.7 (0.5-19.8) days in 1999 and 1.7 (0.2-7.6) days in 1997 (P=0.85). CONCLUSIONS: We successfully changed standard practice from using nebulisers to spacers for bronchodilator delivery in children with mild to moderate acute asthma, with no difference in the need for or duration of hospitalisation.

Clinical features of neonatal seizures.

OBJECTIVE: Identification of seizures in neonates is difficult. This study analyses the clinical features of seizures in a cohort of neonates. METHODOLOGY: The clinical events of 41 neonates referred for investigation of suspected seizures were studied with prolonged video/electroencephalographic (EEG) telemetry. RESULTS: Sixteen neonates had no seizures recorded; 25 had confirmed seizures, 13 with clinical correlates. Each neonate with electroclinical seizures had paroxysms of abnormal movements in stereotyped patterns. These patterns were consistently found to have electrical correlates. Focal clonic movements were seen most frequently. Multiple clinical features characterized the seizure repertoire in six neonates. In five neonates the clinical features became less evident during monitoring and these seizures were difficult to recognize. This change was associated with anticonvulsant administration in three cases. CONCLUSIONS: Electroclinical seizures are characterized by abnormal paroxysmal stereotyped behaviour, often with multiple clinical features. Recommendations for the management of abnormal neonatal events are proposed.