Intraoperative vasopressor use does not increase complications in microvascular post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: Experience in 1729 DIEP flaps at a single center.

INTRODUCTION: Vasopressors are traditionally avoided in microsurgery due to concerns about their effect on free flap survival. We examine the impact of intraoperative vasopressors on microsurgical outcomes in a large series of DIEP flap breast reconstructions. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent DIEP breast reconstruction between January 2010 and May 2020. Intraoperative and postoperative microsurgical outcomes were compared in patients who received vasopressors and those who did not. RESULTS: The study included 1102 women who underwent 1729 DIEP. 878 patients (79.7%) received intraoperative phenylephrine, ephedrine, or a combination of both. There was no significant difference in overall complications, intraoperative microvascular events, takebacks for microvascular complications, or partial or total flap loss between groups. Outcomes were not affected by vasopressor type, dose, or timing of administration. The vasopressor group received significantly lower intraoperative fluid volumes. Multivariate logistic regression found a significant association between overall complications and excessive fluids (OR 2.03, 99% CI 0.98-5.18, p = 0.03) but not vasopressor use (OR 0.79, 99% CI 0.64-3.16, p = 0.7) CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that vasopressors do not adversely affect clinical outcomes after DIEP breast reconstruction. Withholding vasopressors results in excessive intravenous fluid administration and increased postoperative complications.

A Size-Based Criteria for Flap Reconstruction After Thigh-Adductor, Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Resection.

BACKGROUND: Resection of soft-tissue sarcomas from the adductor compartment is associated with significant complications. Free/pedicled flaps often are used for wound closure, but their effect on healing is unclear. We compared wound complications, oncologic, and functional outcomes for patients undergoing flap reconstruction or primary closure following resection of adductor sarcomas. METHODS: A total of 177 patients underwent resection of an adductor sarcoma with primary closure (PrC) or free/pedicled flap reconstruction (FR). Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared, as well as wound complications, oncologic, and functional outcomes (TESS/MSTS87/MSTS93). To examine the relative benefit of flap reconstruction, number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated. RESULTS: In total, 143 patients underwent PrC and 34 had FR, 68% of which were pedicled. There were few differences in demographic, tumor, or treatment characteristics. No significant difference was found in the rate of wound complications. Length of stay was significantly longer in FR (18 days vs. PrC 8 days; p < 0.01). Oncologic and functional outcomes were similar over 5 years follow-up. Uncomplicated wound healing occurred more often in FR compared with PrC for tumors with ≥15 cm (NNT = 8.4) or volumes ≥ 800 ml (NNT = 8.4). Tumors ≤ 336 ml do not benefit from a flap, whereas those > 600 ml are 1.5 times more likely to heal uneventfully after flap closure. CONCLUSIONS: Although flap use prolonged hospitalization, it decreased wound healing complications for larger tumors, and in all sized tumors, it demonstrated similar functional and oncologic outcomes to primary closure. Our size-based treatment criteria can help to identify patients with large adductor sarcomas who could benefit from flap reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: (Retrospective cohort study).

The risk of bias of non-randomized observational studies in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review using ROBINS-I.

INTRODUCTION: The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is regarded as the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. However, due to difficulty designing and conducting randomized controlled trials in surgical interventions, the majority of literature on DIEP flap breast reconstructions are observational studies. As such, it is pivotal that these studies are performed with high internal validity. METHODS: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from January 1, 2015 to October 23, 2021. Studies identified as observational studies about DIEP breast reconstruction and published in a journal with a Web of Science impact factor above 1.0 were included. Screening and risk of bias (RoB) assessment using the ROBINS-I tool were performed independently and in duplicate by two authors. RESULTS: From 12,371 studies, 66 observational studies were included. The majority were found at RoB, with 11 at moderate, 26 at serious, and 6 at critical RoB. Only two studies had low RoB. The bias most commonly arose due to Domain 1 (confounding variables), Domain 3 (classification of interventions), and Domain 6 (measurement of outcomes). CONCLUSIONS: In this review, we demonstrate the high RoB of observational studies evaluating DIEP breast reconstruction, which may jeopardize the validity of findings. We recommend that authors consult the ROBINS-I tool not only when assessing observational studies for systematic reviews but also when designing or conducting these studies. In our study, we present additional considerations for each domain to provide researchers with guidance on assessing and conducting surgical observational studies.

Multidisciplinary Intervention in Radiation-Associated Angiosarcoma of the Breast: Patterns of Recurrence and Response to Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast is an aggressive malignancy affecting 1 in 1000 breast cancer patients. This study aimed to determine differences in treatments and outcomes for RAAS initially managed through a sarcoma multi-disciplinary team (SMDT) compared with an outside center (OC) and to describe outcomes after recurrence. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of breast RAAS between 2004 and 2019 were identified from our sarcoma database. Clinicopathologic characteristics, recurrence patterns, and factors predictive of survival were assessed. Differences in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Surgery was performed for 49 women with RAAS, who had a median age of 74 years (range 41-89 years). Primary management was performed by SMDT for 26 patients and by OC for 23 patients. Radical mastectomy and reconstruction were performed for 96% of the SMDT group versus 17% of the OC group (p = 0.00001). The proportion patients who received chemotherapy, radiation, or both was 42.3% in the SMDT group and 0% in the OC group. During a median follow-up period of 26 months, recurrence was experienced by 38% (10/26) of the SMDT cohort and 83% (19/23) of the OC cohort (p = 0.002). The 3-year LRFS was better in the SMDT cohort (59.3% vs 31.8%; p = 0.019). Of the 29 recurrences 16 received chemotherapy and 6 received radiation, surgery, or both. At the last follow-up visit, 20 patients were in first remission, 1 patient was in second remission, 8 patients were alive with disease, and 20 patients had died of disease. CONCLUSION: Initial treatment by SMDT was associated with more extensive surgery, multimodal treatments, and a better 3-year LRFS. Patients with breast RAAS likely benefit from early referral and treatment by an SMDT.

Longitudinal Study of Psychosocial Outcomes Following Surgery in Women with Unilateral Nonhereditary Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Rates of bilateral mastectomy are rising in women with unilateral, nonhereditary breast cancer. We aim to characterize how psychosocial outcomes evolve after breast cancer surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of women with unilateral, sporadic stage 0-III breast cancer at University Health Network in Toronto, Canada between 2014 and 2017. Women completed validated psychosocial questionnaires (BREAST-Q, Impact of Event Scale, Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale) preoperatively, and at 6 and 12 months following surgery. Change in psychosocial scores was assessed between surgical groups using linear mixed models, controlling for age, stage, and adjuvant treatments. P < .05 were significant. RESULTS: A total of 475 women underwent unilateral lumpectomy (42.5%), unilateral mastectomy (38.3%), and bilateral mastectomy (19.2%). There was a significant interaction (P < .0001) between procedure and time for breast satisfaction, psychosocial and physical well-being. Women having unilateral lumpectomy had higher breast satisfaction and psychosocial well-being scores at 6 and 12 months after surgery compared with either unilateral or bilateral mastectomy, with no difference between the latter two groups. Physical well-being declined in all groups over time; scores were not better in women having bilateral mastectomy. While sexual well-being scores remained stable in the unilateral lumpectomy group, scores declined similarly in both unilateral and bilateral mastectomy groups over time. Cancer-related distress, anxiety, and depression scores declined significantly after surgery, regardless of surgical procedure (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial outcomes are not improved with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with unilateral breast cancer. Our data may inform women considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

The Toronto Sarcoma Flap Score: A Validated Wound Complication Classification System for Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Flap Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Flap reconstruction plays an important role in limb preservation after wide resection of extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS), but can be associated with high rates of postoperative wound complications. Currently, no standardized system exists for the classification of these complications. This study aimed to develop a standardized classification system for wound complications after ESTS flap reconstruction. METHODS: Outcomes of ESTS flap reconstructions were analyzed in a retrospective cohort of 300 patients. All wound- and flap-related complications were identified and categorized. Based on these data, a scoring system was developed and validated with a prospective cohort of 100 patients who underwent ESTS flap reconstruction. RESULTS: A 10-point scoring system was developed based on the level of intervention required to treat each complication observed in the retrospective cohort. Raters applied the scoring system to the prospective patient cohort. Validation studies demonstrated excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability (weighted Cohen's kappa range, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.5-1.0] to 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98-1.0] and 0.95 [95% CI, 0.84-1.0] to 0.97 [95% CI, 0.92-1.0], respectively). The majority of the raters reported the score to be simple, objective, and reproducible (respective mean scores, 4.76 ± 0.43, 4.53 ± 0.62, and 4.56 ± 0.56 on 5-point Likert scales). CONCLUSION: The Toronto Sarcoma Flap Score (TSFS) is a simple and objective classification system with excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability. Universal adoption of the TSFS could standardize outcome reporting in future studies and aid in the establishment of clinical benchmarks to improve the quality of care in sarcoma reconstruction.

Preconsultation Educational Group Intervention Can Address the Knowledge Gap in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Whether to undergo postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) is a challenging, preference-sensitive decision. It is therefore paramount to optimize decision quality through ensuring patients' knowledge and aligning treatments with their personal preferences. This study assessed the effects of a preconsultation educational group intervention (PEGI) on patient knowledge, state-trait anxiety, and decisional conflict (patient uncertainty in decision making) during the decision-making process. METHODS: This phase 3 randomized controlled trial assessed effects of a PEGI in women without active breast cancer undergoing delayed PMBR, or prophylactic mastectomy with immediate PMBR. Both groups underwent routine education before consultation. In addition, the intervention group underwent a PEGI composed of presentations from a plastic surgeon and nurse, a value clarification exercise, and shared experiences from PMBR patients before the consultation with the plastic surgeon. Before and 1-week after consultation, outcome measures were assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the BREAST-Q. RESULTS: Of the 219 women deemed eligible, a total of 156 women were recruited and randomized. Treatment fidelity was 96% and retention was 88%. At baseline, there were no significant differences in terms of demographic or clinical status, knowledge, state-trait anxiety, and decisional conflict. Patient knowledge about PMBR improved in both groups; however, the degree of knowledge attainment was significantly greater in the PEGI group (24.5% improvement in the intervention group compared with 13.5% in the routine education group, P < 0.001). The reduction in decisional conflict from baseline to follow-up was greater in the intervention group compared with the routine education; however, the difference only approached significance (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The provision of a preconsultation educational group intervention has been shown to significantly close the knowledge gap on PMBR in patients seeking delayed breast reconstruction or prophylactic mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction compared with routine education alone.

Early Postoperative Complications From National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: A Closer Examination of Timing and Technique of Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Despite the recent surge in rates of immediate breast reconstruction, there is a paucity of large multicenter studies to compare differences in morbidity after immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction. This study used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to study the association between timing of breast reconstruction and complication rates, stratified by reconstructive modality. STUDY DESIGN: The NSQIP database was used to identify breast reconstructions from 2005 to 2012. Rates of major complications were compared by timing within each reconstructive modality (implant vs autologous). Cohort differences in baseline characteristics and variables associated with increased complication rates were identified in bivariate analyses. A multivariable model was created to compare the association between the timing of reconstruction and major complications. RESULTS: Of 24,506 postmastectomy reconstructions, 85.8% were immediate, 14.2% were delayed, 84% were implant, and 16% were autologous reconstructions. Overall, 10.0% of patients suffered a major complication. After stratification, only implant reconstructions showed a statistically higher complication rate with immediate (8.8%) reconstruction compared with delayed (5.3%) (odds ratio, 1.7, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in complication rates between autologous immediate (18.4%) or delayed (19.0%) reconstructions. After controlling for baseline cohort differences and other risk factors, immediate reconstruction remained as an independent significant predictor of major complications in implant reconstructions (odds ratio, 1.8, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction is associated with a significantly higher rate of major complications in implant reconstruction but not in autologous reconstruction. It is important to include these findings in the routine preoperative surgeon-patient discussion of reconstructive options.

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy at the time of delayed microvascular breast reconstruction adversely affects patient-reported outcomes: A retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: An increasing number of women with unilateral breast cancer are seeking bilateral mastectomies and reconstruction. At our centre, many women who have undergone previous unilateral therapeutic mastectomy request contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) at the time of delayed reconstruction. These mixed timing reconstructions are particularly challenging as patients have an immediate reconstruction on one side and delayed reconstruction on the other, which may result in asymmetry. This retrospective cohort study evaluates patient-reported satisfaction following mixed timing breast reconstruction and compares them to unilateral delayed reconstruction. METHODS: One hundred and forty-one patients who underwent successful deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction and completed baseline and 12-month BREAST-Qs were included in the study. Patient-reported outcomes following bilateral mixed timing reconstruction (n = 56) were compared to those of unilateral delayed reconstruction (UDR) without CPM (n = 85). RESULTS: Women who sought CPM were significantly younger and had lower annual incomes when compared with those who underwent unilateral reconstruction. Mixed timing reconstruction was associated with significantly lower levels of breast satisfaction and psychosocial function as compared to UDR at 12 months post-operatively. BREAST-Q scores (18 months) were available for 75 patients in the cohort and indicated that this decreased breast satisfaction and psychosocial impairment was sustained in the longer-term. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who seek CPM at the time of delayed reconstruction should be advised that this is associated with lower levels of breast satisfaction and psychosocial well-being as compared to unilateral delayed breast reconstruction.

Development and Evaluation of a Machine Learning Prediction Model for Flap Failure in Microvascular Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Despite high success rates, flap failure remains an inherent risk in microvascular breast reconstruction. Identifying patients who are at high risk for flap failure would enable us to recommend alternative reconstructive techniques. However, as flap failure is a rare event, identification of risk factors is statistically challenging. Machine learning is a form of artificial intelligence that automates analytical model building. It has been proposed that machine learning can build superior prediction models when the outcome of interest is rare. METHODS: In this study we evaluate machine learning resampling and decision-tree classification models for the prediction of flap failure in a large retrospective cohort of microvascular breast reconstructions. RESULTS: A total of 1012 patients were included in the study. Twelve patients (1.1%) experienced flap failure. The ROSE informed oversampling technique and decision-tree classification resulted in a strong prediction model (AUC 0.95) with high sensitivity and specificity. In the testing cohort, the model maintained acceptable specificity and predictive power (AUC 0.67), but sensitivity was reduced. The model identified four high-risk patient groups. Obesity, comorbidities and smoking were found to contribute to flap loss. The flap failure rate in high-risk patients was 7.8% compared with 0.44% in the low-risk cohort (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This machine-learning risk prediction model suggests that flap failure may not be a random event. The algorithm indicates that flap failure is multifactorial and identifies a number of potential contributing factors that warrant further investigation.

A structured pathway for accelerated postoperative recovery reduces hospital stay and cost of care following microvascular breast reconstruction without increased complications.

INTRODUCTION: Accelerated recovery protocols have proved effective in many surgical procedures but are infrequently applied in breast reconstruction. In this study, we evaluate the impact of a structured pathway for accelerated postoperative recovery in patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction at a high-volume center. METHODS: We describe our care pathway for patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction at our center. We compared length of stay (LOS), complication rates, readmission rates, and cost of inpatient care before (pre-protocol (Pre-P)) and after (post-protocol (Post-P)) the implementation of the protocol. RESULTS: Patients in the Post-P group (n = 198) had a significant reduction in mean LOS as compared to those in the Pre-P (n = 183) group (3.6 +/- 0.85 vs. 4.7 +/-1.04 days, p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in the rates of major (Pre-P 16.9% vs. Post-P 14.7%, p = 0.71) or minor (Pre-P 21.3% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.22) postoperative complications between groups. The readmission rates were also similar (Pre-P 6.5% vs. Post-P 4.5, p = 0.69). Implementation of the protocol resulted in a significant reduction in the mean cost of in-patient care. CONCLUSION: A simple protocol for accelerated and streamlined postoperative recovery effectively reduces LOS and patient care costs following DIEP flap breast reconstruction without compromising patient safety.

Development and validation of a risk stratification model for immediate microvascular breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Immediate breast reconstruction has many advantages but is associated with higher complication rates than delayed reconstruction. Complications can delay the delivery of adjuvant cancer treatments. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk stratification model for the prediction of perioperative complications in immediate microvascular breast reconstruction. METHODS: The association between patient and treatment variables and perioperative complications was evaluated in a retrospective cohort of 351 women undergoing immediate breast reconstruction using free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the strength of association and weighted scores were assigned. Using cumulative risk scores, patients were stratified into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups. The model was then validated in a prospective cohort of 100 consecutive patients. RESULTS: Obesity, smoking, prior radiation, and comorbidities were important predictors and incorporated into the risk model. Complications occurred in 23.5% of low-risk (95% confidence interval [CI] = 17.7-29.2), 38.4% of intermediate-risk (95% CI = 29.2-47.5) and 53.9% of high-risk (95% CI = 33.3-74.4) patients. Validation confirmed a linear relationship between the risk stratification categories and complications in a model with good predictive power (c-statistic = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.6-0.8). CONCLUSION: A simple risk score, based on known preoperative variables, provides accurate risk stratification for patients considering immediate microvascular breast reconstruction.

Predictors of uptake of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with nonhereditary breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) are increasing in women with breast cancer. Previous retrospective research has examined clinical and demographic predictors of the uptake of CPM. However, to the authors' knowledge, there has been very little prospective research to date that has examined psychosocial functioning prior to breast cancer surgery to determine whether psychosocial functioning predicts uptake of CPM. The current study was conducted to evaluate demographic, clinical, and psychosocial predictors of the uptake of CPM in women with unilateral breast cancer without a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. METHODS: Women with unilateral non-BRCA-associated breast cancer completed questionnaires prior to undergoing breast cancer surgery. Participants completed demographic and psychosocial questionnaires assessing anxiety, depression, cancer-related distress, optimism/pessimism, breast satisfaction, and quality of life. Pathological and surgical data were collected from medical charts. RESULTS: A total of 506 women consented to participate, 112 of whom (22.1%) elected to undergo CPM. Age was found to be a significant predictor of CPM, with younger women found to be significantly more likely to undergo CPM compared with older women (P < .0001). The rate of CPM was significantly higher in women with noninvasive breast cancer compared with those with invasive breast cancer (P < .0001). Women who elected to undergo CPM had lower levels of presurgical breast satisfaction (P = .01) and optimism (P = .05) compared with women who did not undergo CPM. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial functioning at the time of breast cancer surgery decision making impacts decisions related to CPM. Women who have lower levels of breast satisfaction (body image) and optimism are more likely to elect to undergo CPM. It is important for health care providers to take psychosocial functioning into consideration when discussing surgical options.