Association between e-cigarette use and asthma among US adolescents: Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System 2015-2019.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that e-cigarette use, which has increased rapidly among US adolescents, may cause respiratory distress. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the factors associated with e-cigarette use and the relationship between e-cigarette use and asthma among US adolescents. METHODS: Data from the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed, and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify demographic and behavioral factors associated with e-cigarette use. Stratified analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between e-cigarette use and asthma among adolescents by previous combustible product use. RESULTS: This study found that Hispanic adolescents had lower odds of e-cigarette use than White adolescents in Texas, with factors such as age, substance use, and depression being associated with use. In the US, male gender, previous combustible and substance use, and depression were associated with higher odds of ever using e-cigarettes, while current use was associated with several factors including age and White race. E-cigarette use was significantly associated with asthma among adolescents who have never used combustible products in both Texas and the entire US after adjusting for covariates (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06-1.66 and OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02-1.37, respectively). CONCLUSION: The findings from this study can be used to inform public health strategies and policies aimed at reducing e-cigarette use and its associated health risks among adolescents.

The contribution of secondhand tobacco smoke to blood lead levels in US children and adolescents: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2015-2018.

BACKGROUND: Lead is a major developmental neurotoxicant in children, and tobacco smoke has been suggested as a source of lead exposure in vulnerable populations. This study evaluates the contribution of secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) to blood lead levels (BLLs) in children and adolescents. METHODS: We analyze data from 2,815 participants aged 6-19 years who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2015-2018) to investigate the association between serum cotinine levels and BLLs. A multivariate linear regression was conducted to estimate geometric means (GMs) and the ratios of GMs after adjusting for all covariates. RESULTS: The geometric means of BLLs in study participants aged 6 - 19 years were 0.46 µg/dl (95% CI 0.44, 0.49). After adjusting for relevant participant characteristics, the geometric means of BLLs were 18% (BLL 0.48 µg/dl, 95% CI 0.45, 0.51) and 29% (BLL 0.52 µg/dl, 95% CI 0.46, 0.59) higher in participants who had intermediate serum cotinine levels (0.03 - 3 ng/mL) and those who had high serum cotinine levels (> 3 ng/mL) respectively, compared to participants who had low serum cotinine levels (BLL 0.41 µg/dl, 95% CI 0.38, 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: SHS exposure may be a source of BLLs in US children and adolescents. Efforts to reduce lead exposure in children and adolescents should include strategies to reduce SHS exposure.

An interdisciplinary team-based approach for significantly reducing lower-level lead poisoning in U.S. children.

Child lead poisoning damages central nervous system, immune, and renal function, and is the longest-standing public health epidemic in U.S. history. While primary prevention is the ultimate goal, secondary intervention is critical for curbing effects among children already exposed. Despite the lowering of child blood lead level (BLL) reference value in 2012 and again in 2021, few changes to secondary intervention approaches have been discussed. This study tested a novel interdisciplinary approach integrating ongoing child BLL-monitoring with education and home mitigation for families living in neighborhoods at high-risk of child lead exposure. In children ages 6 months to 16 years, most of whom had lowest range exposures, we predicted significantly reduced BLLs following intervention. Methods: Twenty-one families with 49 children, were offered enrollment when at least 1 child in the family was found to have a BLL > 2.5 µg/dL. Child BLLs, determined by ICPMS, were monitored at 4- to 6-month intervals. Education was tailored to family needs, reinforced through repeated parent engagement, and was followed by home testing reports with detailed case-specific information and recommendations for no-cost/low-cost mitigation. Results: Ninety percent of enrolled families complied with the mitigation program. In most cases, isolated, simple-to-mitigate lead hazard sources were found. Most prevalent were consumer products, found in 69% (11/16) of homes. Lead paint was identified in 56% (9/16) of homes. Generalized linear regression with Test Wave as a random effect showed that children's BLLs decreased significantly following the intervention despite fluctuations. Conclusion: Lower-level lead poisoning can be reduced through an interdisciplinary approach that combines ongoing child BLL monitoring; repeated, one-on-one parent prevention education; and identification and no-cost/low-cost mitigation of home lead hazards. Biannual child BLL monitoring is essential for detecting and responding to changes in child BLLs, particularly in neighborhoods deemed high-risk for child lead poisoning.

Improving Equitability and Inclusion for Testing and Detection of Lead Poisoning in US Children.

Policy Points Child lead poisoning is associated with socioeconomic inequity and perpetuates health inequality. Methods for testing and detection of child lead poisoning are ill suited to the current demographics and characteristics of the problem. A three-pronged revision of current testing approaches is suggested. Employing the suggested revisions can immediately increase our national capacity for equitable, inclusive testing and detection. ABSTRACT: Child lead poisoning, the longest-standing child public health epidemic in US history, is associated with socioeconomic inequity and perpetuates health inequality. Removing lead from children's environments ("primary prevention") is and must remain the definitive solution for ending child lead poisoning. Until that goal can be realized, protecting children's health necessarily depends on the adequacy of our methods for testing and detection. Current methods for testing and detection, however, are no longer suited to the demographics and magnitude of the problem. We discuss the potential deployment and feasibility of a three-pronged revision of current practices including: 1) acceptance of capillary samples for final determination of lead poisoning, with electronic documentation of "clean" collection methods submitted by workers who complete simple Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-endorsed online training and certification for capillary sample collection; 2) new guidance specifying the analysis of capillary samples by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry or graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry with documented limit of detection ≤0.2 µg/dL; and 3) adaptive "census tract-specific" universal testing and monitoring guidance for children from birth to 10 years of age. These testing modifications can bring child blood lead level (BLL) testing into homes and communities, immediately increasing our national capacity for inclusive and equitable detection and monitoring of dangerous lower-range BLLs in US children.