Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in a tertiary care medical center.

This retrospective, case-control study aimed to identify variables associated with the incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) in acute care facilities and to specifically identify the relationship of fluoroquinolones and acid suppressive agents in the development of CDAD. Seventy-one symptomatic patients positive for C. difficile toxin A or B hospitalized for at least 72 hours were compared with 142 control patients hospitalized for at least 72 hours who were not positive for C. difficile toxin A or B. Two controls were matched to one case patient for age within 5 years, unit of admission, and date of admission. The mean ages for cases and controls were 63.5 and 62.7 years, respectively. After adjusting for two confounding variables-hospital stay within 3 months and Charlson Comorbidity Index-conditional multiple logistic regression identified six risk factors for development of CDAD: gastrointestinal procedures within 60 days (odds ratio [OR] 9.1, P < 0.013), levofloxacin exposure (OR 8.2, P < 0.033), moxifloxacin exposure (OR 4.1, P < 0.026), imipenem exposure (OR 14.9, P < 0.014), laxative use (OR 20.2, P < 0.0001), and immunosuppressive use (OR 20.7, P < 0.034). The risk of CDAD after exposure to levofloxacin or moxifloxacin was not significantly different. Acid suppressive therapy was not a risk factor for CDAD development.

Efflux pump contribution to multidrug resistance in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if increased expression of efflux pumps, mutations in the genes encoding regulatory proteins for efflux pumps, or the combination is associated with multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. DESIGN: Microbiologic evaluation of prospectively collected Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. SETTING: University teaching hospital. ISOLATES: One hundred eight unique P. aeruginosa isolates-50 non-MDR and 58 MDR isolates-obtained from pulmonary or blood sources from patients admitted to the intensive care unit between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2004. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Isolates were considered MDR if they were resistant to at least three of the following four drugs: ciprofloxacin, tobramycin, ceftazidime, or imipenem. Possible mutations in efflux regulatory genes mexR, nfxB, and mexZ were analyzed by using polymerase chain reaction amplification and DNA sequencing. Determination of the expression of outer membrane proteins OprM and OprJ was performed by using sodium dodecyl sulfate- polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis immunoblotting. Differences in regulatory gene mutations and outer membrane protein expression were compared between non-MDR and MDR isolates. Among the 108 P. aeruginosa isolates, the MDR isolates were more likely to overexpress OprM compared with non-MDR isolates (64% vs 2%, p<0.001). Mutations in mexR and mexZ were present in 64% and 26% of MDR strains, respectively, but were not associated with OprM overexpression or multidrug resistance. Expression of OprJ was not associated with MDR isolates (odds ratio [OR] 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-18.5, p=0.11). Mutations in nfxB (12% of MDR strains) were also not associated with multidrug resistance (OR 3.5, 95% CI 0.7-17.8, p=0.13). Eight (100%) of 8 isolates with OprJ expression plus OprM overexpression, 12 (92%) of 13 isolates with combined mexR and mexZ mutations, 5 (100%) of 5 isolates with nfxB plus mexZ mutations, and 16 (100%) of 16 isolates with OprM overexpression plus mexZ mutations were MDR isolates. CONCLUSION: The presence of one regulatory gene mutation or simple expression of a single outer membrane protein was not linked to multidrug resistance. However, OprM overexpression and multiple efflux regulatory gene mutations or efflux protein expression were associated with MDR P. aeruginosa isolates.

Levofloxacin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in patients with severe burn injury.

Levofloxacin pharmacokinetics were studied in 11 patients with severe burn injuries. Patients (values are means +/- standard deviations; age, 41 +/- 17 years; weight, 81 +/- 12 kg; creatinine clearance, 114 +/- 40 ml/min) received intravenous levofloxacin at 750 mg (n = 10 patients) or 500 mg (n = one patient) once daily. Blood samples were collected on day 1 of levofloxacin therapy; eight patients were studied again on days 4 to 6. The pharmacodynamic probability of target attainment (PTA) was evaluated by Monte Carlo simulation. Mean systemic clearance, half-life, and area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h after levofloxacin at 750 mg were 9.0 +/- 3.2 liters/h, 7.8 +/- 1.6 h, and 93 +/- 31 mg . h/liter, respectively. There were no differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between day 1 and day 4; however, large intrapatient and interpatient variability was observed. Levofloxacin pharmacokinetics in burned patients were similar to those reported in other critically ill populations. Levofloxacin at 750 mg achieved >90% PTA for gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens with MICs of < or =0.5 microg/ml and MICs of < or =1 microg/ml, respectively. However, satisfactory PTA was not obtained with less-susceptible gram-negative organisms with MICs of 1 microg/ml or any organism with a MIC of > or =2 microg/ml. The results of this study indicate that levofloxacin should be administered at 750 mg/day for treatment of systemic infections in severely burned patients. However, even 750 mg/day may be inadequate for gram-negative organisms with MICs of 1 to 2 microg/ml even though they are defined as susceptible. Alternative antibiotics or treatment strategies should be considered for infections due to these pathogens.

Acute ethanol intoxication after consumption of hairspray.

A 61-year-old woman with a history of alcohol dependence came to the emergency department with ethanol intoxication. Her serum ethanol concentration was 322 mg/dl. When questioned, she admitted to consuming a 14-oz bottle of hairspray mixed with water because of its denatured alcohol content. The woman had used nonbeverage sources of alcohol on a regular basis for a number of years after learning of the practice from fellow attendees of Alcoholics Anonymous meetings. Her primary reason for this behavior was to hide her continued alcohol abuse from her family. She consumed hairspray that contained 50% denatured alcohol by volume; the amount she ingested was equal to 7 fluid oz of ethanol, the equivalent of 14 1.25-oz shots of 80-proof liquor. Her serum ethanol concentration was consistent with that predicted by pharmacokinetic equations based on the consumption of one bottle of hairspray. The hairspray product contained specially denatured alcohol 40-B, which consists of ethanol and small quantities of t-butyl alcohol and denatonium benzoate. Ethanol is the substance of primary toxicologic concern. Clinicians need to be aware that numerous nonbeverage sources of alcohol exist and should be considered when a patient presents with acute intoxication. The source and its components should be identified as soon as possible in order to assess other potential toxicities.

Nosocomial infections due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: epidemiology and treatment options.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the leading gram-negative organisms associated with nosocomial infections. The increasing frequency of multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA) strains is concerning as efficacious antimicrobial options are severely limited. By searching MEDLINE from January 1966-February 2005 and relevant journals for abstracts, we reviewed the frequency, risk factors, and patient outcomes of MDRPA nosocomial infections in critically ill patients, determined the available antimicrobial therapies, and then provided recommendations for clinicians. The definition of MDRPA was established as isolates intermediate or resistant to at least three drugs in the following classes: beta-lactams, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones. Reported rates of MDRPA varied from 0.6-32% according to geographic location and type of surveillance study. Risk factors for MDRPA infection included prolonged hospitalization, exposure to antimicrobial therapy, and immunocompromised states such as human immunodeficiency virus infection. Emergence of MDRPA isolates during therapy was reported in 27-72% of patients with initially susceptible P. aeruginosa isolates. Patients with severe MDRPA infections should be treated with combination therapy, consisting of an antipseudomonal beta-lactam with an aminoglycoside or fluoroquinolone rather than aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone combinations, to provide adequate therapy and improve patient outcomes. Synergy has been observed when resistant antipseudomonal drugs were combined in vitro against MDRPA with successful clinical application reported in two centers. Colistin with adjunctive therapy, such as a beta-lactam or rifampin, may be a useful agent in MDRPA when antimicrobial options are limited, but patients should be monitored closely for toxicities associated with this agent. Standardization of terminology for MDRPA isolates is needed for consistency and comparability of surveillance and institutional reports. Clinical studies are needed to identify risk factors for MDRPA development and to determine the economic impact of these infections, as well as to determine the most efficacious antimicrobial regimens and duration of therapy to maximize outcomes in the treatment of MDRPA infections.

Vasopressin, not octreotide, may be beneficial in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a severe complication of cirrhosis and is associated with high mortality. Ornipressin and terlipressin are effective in treatment of HRS, but are not available in the USA. The efficacy of vasopressin (AVP) and octreotide (OCT) infusions, commonly utilized in the USA, in the treatment of HRS is unknown. This study aims to evaluate the effects of AVP and OCT on renal function, systemic haemodynamics and clinical outcomes in HRS. METHODS: This observational study evaluated patients receiving AVP or OCT therapy for HRS from January 2000 to December 2003. Recovery from HRS was defined as a decrease in the serum creatinine (SCr) to a value < or =1.5 mg/dl. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were identified: eight received AVP, 16 received OCT and 19 received both AVP and OCT. Patients who received AVP alone or in combination with OCT had significantly greater recovery rates than those receiving OCT monotherapy (42 vs 38 vs 0%, respectively, P = 0.01). The average time to response in serum creatinine (SCr) was 7+/- 2 days. The mean AVP doses were 0.23+/-0.19 U/min in patients demonstrating clinical response. Therapy with AVP was an independent predictor of recovery (odds ratio 6.4, 95% confidence interval 1.3-31.8). Patients who responded to therapy had significantly lower mortality (23 vs 67%, P = 0.008) and higher rates of liver transplantation (23 vs 0%, P = 0.005). No adverse effects related to AVP therapy were observed. CONCLUSION: When compared with OCT, HRS patients treated with AVP had significantly higher recovery rates, improved survival and were more likely to receive a liver transplant.

National surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from intensive care unit patients from 1993 to 2002.

Nosocomial infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in critically ill patients are often difficult to treat due to resistance to multiple antimicrobials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate antimicrobial resistance among P. aeruginosa isolates from intensive care unit patients in the United States from 1993 to 2002 by using the Intensive Care Unit Surveillance Study database. Over the 10-year period, susceptibility of 13,999 nonduplicate isolates of P. aeruginosa was analyzed. From 1993 to 2002, nationwide increases in antimicrobial resistance were greatest for ciprofloxacin, imipenem, tobramycin, and aztreonam. Rates of multidrug resistance (resistance to > or =3 of the following drugs: ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, tobramycin, and imipenem) increased from 4% in 1993 to 14% in 2002. The lowest dual resistance rates were observed between aminoglycosides or fluoroquinolones with piperacillin-tazobactam while the highest were for those that included beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin. Ongoing surveillance studies are crucial in monitoring antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and selecting empirical treatment regimens.

The role of vasopressin in vasodilatory septic shock.

Septic shock that requires therapy with adrenergic agents is associated with high rates of mortality. Inappropriately normal or low serum concentrations of vasopressin contribute to the development of hypotension during sepsis. We critically evaluated the role of administering exogenous vasopressin to patients with septic shock. A computerized search of MEDLINE from January 1966--December 2003 and a manual search of relevant journals for abstracts were conducted. Eleven retrospective, six prospective cohort, and four prospective randomized studies were identified. Most studies evaluated short-term infusions of vasopressin at 0.08 U/minute or less as add-on therapy in patients requiring adrenergic agents. The results show that starting vasopressin in patients with septic shock increases systemic vascular resistance and arterial blood pressure, thus reducing the dosage requirements of adrenergic agents. These effects are rapid and sustained. Substantial enhancement of urine production, likely due to increased glomerular filtration rate, was shown in several studies. A few studies demonstrated clinically significant reduced cardiac output or cardiac index after vasopressin was begun, necessitating cautious use in patients with cardiac dysfunction. Vasopressin was associated with ischemia of the mesenteric mucosa, skin, and myocardium; elevated hepatic transaminase and bilirubin concentrations; hyponatremia; and thrombocytopenia. Limiting the dosage to 0.03 U/minut or less may minimize the development of these adverse effects. Vasopressin 0.03 U/minute or less should be considered if response to one or two adrenergic agents is inadequate or as a method to reduce the dosage of adrenergic agents. At present, vasopressin therapy should not be started as first-line therapy. Additional studies are needed to determine the optimum dosage, duration, and place in therapy of vasopressin relative to adrenergic agents. A multicenter, comparative study of vasopressin 0.03 U/minute as add-on therapy is under way and should provide mortality data.

Effects of continuous vasopressin infusion in patients with septic shock.

BACKGROUND: Small studies have reported that vasopressin improves hemodynamic instability in patients with septic shock. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether vasopressin infusion increases blood pressure, decreases catecholamine vasopressor use, and improves renal function in a large patient population with septic shock when used in a clinical setting. METHODS: A retrospective chart audit was conducted of critically ill patients who received vasopressin infusion for septic shock from January 2000 through September 2002. Demographic, hemodynamic, laboratory, vasopressor, and adverse event data were collected. Statistical methods included ANOVA with Tukey's test for post hoc analysis. RESULTS: A total of 102 of 353 patients met study criteria. The mean +/- SD vasopressin dosage regimen was 0.11 +/- 0.17 units/min for 53.8 +/- 71.5 hours. Compared with baseline, vasopressin infusion improved mean arterial pressure (MAP) by 15% within one hour (p < 0.05), reduced heart rate by 9% within 4 hours (p < 0.05), and reduced hourly dopamine dosage by 25% within 8 hours (p < 0.05). These effects persisted through 96 hours. Other hemodynamic variables and catecholamine vasopressor usage parameters were not statistically different from baseline. Urine output, serum creatinine, and serum sodium concentrations were not statistically changed from baseline. Adverse events possibly associated with vasopressin infusion included ischemic digits/extremities, myocardial infarction, and hyponatremia. CONCLUSIONS: Vasopressin infusion was effective in increasing MAP and reducing heart rate while decreasing the dopamine dosage in patients with septic shock. Comparative studies with catecholamine vasopressors are needed to define the optimal role of vasopressin in septic shock therapy. In the meantime, vasopressin infusion at