Effect of Filler Therapy on Psychosocial Distress in Facial Paralysis: Patients with Major Asymmetry Derive Greater Benefit.

Background: Facial filler is an effective nonsurgical treatment option for improving facial symmetry in patients with facial paralysis (FP). Objective: To compare the effects of filler among patients with FP that is self-perceived as major or minor asymmetry, by measuring psychosocial distress. Methods: In this prospective cohort study of patients with FP undergoing filler at a tertiary academic center, patients were classified as having minor or major self-perceived asymmetry using a visual analog scale (VAS). FACE-Q Appearance-Related Psychosocial Distress was administered before and after filler. Descriptive statistics and a random-effects generalized linear model assessed the relationship between perceived facial asymmetry and change in psychosocial distress. Results: A total of 28 patients participated. Twenty-five (89%) patients were female with median age of 54 (interquartile range [IQR]: 49-66). Median VAS score was 2 (IQR: 1-3.5, 0 = completely asymmetric, 10 = no asymmetry). Psychosocial distress improved in all patients after filler. In multivariable modeling, patients with major asymmetry experienced 2.45 (confidence interval: 0.46-4.44, p = 0.016) points more improvement in psychosocial distress than patients with minor asymmetry. Age, gender, and FP duration were not associated with change in psychosocial distress. Conclusion: Facial filler treatment was seen to improve psychosocial distress in patients with FP, especially by those with more self-perceived deficit.

Septal Perforation Repair Using a Temporoparietal Fascia and Polydioxanone Plate Construct: A Multi-Institutional Analysis.

Background: Nasal septal perforations (NSPs) are notoriously difficult to fix and closure can paradoxically lead to worsening of symptoms, prompting numerous techniques for repair including temporoparietal fascia (TPF)-polydioxanone (PDS) plate interposition grafting. Objectives: To compare rates of NSP closure with TPF-PDS interposition grafting among a variety of institutions with diverse environmental influences and patient-specific factors. Methods: Retrospective review of patients undergoing TPF-PDS interposition grafting at seven different U.S. institutions over 5 years. Outcomes include closure rate, self-reported symptom improvement, change in Nasal Obstruction Symptomatic Evaluation (NOSE) score, and postoperative complications. Results: Sixty-two patients (39 female) with a mean age of 41.5 years were included. Most common perforation location was anterior (53%), and average size was 1.70 cm2. NSP closure with symptomatic improvement was achieved in 95% of participants. Postoperative NOSE scores decreased on average by 42 points. Residual crusting occurred in 29% of patients, independent of external factors. Conclusions: TPF-PDS interposition grafting is highly effective for NSP repair in a wide variety of settings, and NOSE scores correspond well with patient-reported outcomes.

Development of an interdisciplinary microtia-atresia care model: A single-center 20-year experience.

Objectives: Microtia and aural atresia are congenital ear anomalies with a wide-ranging spectrum of phenotypes and varied functional and psychosocial consequences for patients. This study seeks to analyze the management of microtia-atresia patients at our center over a 20-year period and to propose recommendations for advancing microtia-atresia care at a national level. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from patients presenting to the Massachusetts Eye and Ear (Boston, MA) for initial otolaryngology consultation for congenital microtia and/or aural atresia between 1999 and 2018. Results: Over the 20-year study period, 229 patients presented to our microtia-atresia center at a median age of 7 years. The severity of microtia was most commonly classified as grade III (n = 87, 38%), 61% (n = 140) of patients had complete atresia, the median Jahrsdoerfer grading scale score was 6 (range 0-10), and 81 patients (35%) underwent surgery for microtia repair. For hearing rehabilitation, 30 patients (64%) underwent bone conduction device implantation and 17 patients (36%) underwent atresiaplasty. The implementation of an interdisciplinary, longitudinal care model resulted in an increase in patient (r = 0.819, p < .001) and surgical volume (microtia surgeries, r = 0.521, p = .019; otologic surgeries, r = 0.767, p < .001) at our center over time. Conclusion: An interdisciplinary team approach to microtia-atresia patient care may result in increased patient volume, which could improve aesthetic and hearing outcomes over time by concentrating care and surgical expertise. Future work should aim to establish standardized clinical consensus recommendations to guide the creation of high-quality microtia-atresia care programs. Level of Evidence: 4.

Opioid Prescribing Patterns Among Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons in the Medicare Population.

Objective: To evaluate opioid prescribing patterns among American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (AAFPRS) members in the Medicare population. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of AAFPRS members in the Medicare Part D Prescriber dataset. Results: From 2014 to 2016, there was a significant decrease in the number of days of opioids supplied per beneficiary (5.9 vs. 4.9 days, p < 0.005), as well as the opioid prescription cost per beneficiary ($14.52 vs. $11.79, p = 0.005). The highest prescription rate was found in the Midwest (20.5%) and lowest in the Northeast (14.0%), however, the difference between geographic regions was not significant (p = 0.11). There was a significant decrease in the number of total opioid days supplied per beneficiary in the South (p = 0.001), Midwest (p = 0.05), and West regions (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in opioid prescription rate (p = 0.89) or total opioid days supplied per beneficiary (p = 0.26) when states were stratified by age-adjusted opioid-specific death rate. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a national trend toward fewer opioid days supplied and less opioid cost per Medicare beneficiary among AAFPRS members between 2014 and 2016.

Dermal Filler Treatment Improves Psychosocial Well-Being in Facial Paralysis Patients.

Background: In the care of the facial paralysis (FP) patient, outcomes have historically focused on facial function rather than the psychosocial burden of the disease state. Yet, FP patients often describe the impact of their disease on domains of psychosocial health. These patient concerns have motivated clinicians to formally recognize and treat nonfunctional sequelae of the disease. Dermal filler therapy (DFT) is a minimally invasive reversible procedure that can be used to treat facial asymmetry and improve psychosocial well-being in FP patients. However, there are no data describing outcomes of DFT in FP-related facial asymmetry. Therefore, we sought to formally characterize FP patients' facial symmetry and psychosocial well-being before and after DFT. Methods: FP patients presenting for DFT at a tertiary academic medical center were prospectively interviewed. Patients completed the validated FACE-Q for Appearance-Related Psychosocial Distress instrument. Self-reported facial symmetry scores were recorded. Patients were evaluated before and 2 weeks after DFT. Statistical analysis was performed on R software using paired sample t-tests. Results: Twenty FP patients completed DFT treatment and two surveys. The cohort was predominantly female (n = 19, 95%) with an average age of 54 years. After a single treatment of DFT averaging 2.3 mL, patients had significant improvement in facial symmetry and psychosocial well-being. Patients felt particular improvement in self-confidence and emotional expression (p < 0.0001 for all stated comparisons). Conclusion: FP of varying etiologies is associated with significant functional, psychosocial, and quality-of-life impairments. This is the first prospective study to demonstrate statistically significant improvements in facial symmetry and psychosocial well-being after a single office-based treatment of dermal filler. In addition, our study's emphasis on psychosocial health instruments reflects an increased awareness of this important domain in the care of the FP patient.

Prospective Qualitative Multidimensional Assessment of the Postoperative Rhinoplasty Experience.

Background: Understanding the multidimensional postoperative patient experience after rhinoplasty is critical for preoperative counseling and postoperative management. Methods: A prospective clinical study was conducted from June to December 2019 for 60 patients undergoing cosmetic and/or functional rhinoplasty by two facial plastic surgeons. All patients were administered the brief pain inventory, a clinically validated pain instrument, including multiple quality of life (QOL) domains, survey at postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, 3, and 8. Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores were used to predict patients having greatest QOL disturbance. Primary outcomes were postoperative QOL domains, pain scores, and oxycodone usage. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 14.0 (STATA Corp., College Station, TX). Preoperative NOSE and postoperative Euro Quality of Life 5-Dimension scores were also recorded. Results: Patients showed greatest disruption to QOL in the first 3 PODs and essentially returned to normal levels by POD8, which mirrored trends in pain and opioid usage. All tested QOL domains (general activity, sleep, work, mood, enjoyment, and relationships) were strongly correlated with overall pain. NOSE scores were not significantly associated with pain or QOL impairment. Conclusions: This is the first study to prospectively evaluate the rhinoplasty patient's postoperative experience using a pain instrument, including multiple QOL domains. Utilizing a validated clinical instrument allows for standardized comparison of postrhinoplasty pain and QOL disruption with other surgical procedures and disease processes. These data may help guide preoperative counseling and set accurate patient expectations for the postoperative period.

Societal-Perceived Health Utility of Hypertrophic Facial Port-Wine Stain and Laser Treatment.

Background: Port-wine stain (PWS) is a congenital capillary malformation occurring commonly in the head and neck. Left untreated, affected areas may darken and hypertrophy over time, resulting in pronounced disfigurement, risk of spontaneous hemorrhage, and functional impairment. The burden of hypertrophic facial PWS and the benefit of laser therapy have not heretofore been well characterized. Herein, the health utility of these two states is assessed among naïve observers. Methods: Naïve observers (n = 262) ranked the utility of four randomized health states (monocular blindness, binocular blindness, hypertrophic facial PWS, and laser-treated facial PWS) by means of visual analogue scale (VAS), standard gamble (SG), and time trade-off (TTO) techniques. Health states are presented using standardized facial photographs. Results: Health utilities (VAS, SG, and TTO) were reported as follows (mean ± standard deviation): monocular blindness (0.73 ± 0.21, 0.86 ± 0.21, 0.87 ± 0.18), binocular blindness (0.51 ± 0.26, 0.72 ± 0.27, 0.69 ± 0.27), hypertrophic facial PWS (0.71 ± 0.24, 0.83 ± 0.23, 0.83 ± 0.21), and laser-treated facial PWS (0.87 ± 0.16, 0.91 ± 0.18, 0.92 ± 0.16). Laser-treated facial PWS showed significantly higher utility measures than the untreated hypertrophic state (p < 0.001, all measures), with a difference of 3.24 quality-adjusted life years. Linear regression analysis revealed that non-Caucasian race and higher level of education were associated with lower SG and TTO utility scores for the hypertrophic facial PWS state among naïve observers. Conclusions: Societal-perceived utility of hypertrophic facial PWS is similar to that of monocular blindness. Laser-treated facial PWS is perceived significantly more favorably than the untreated hypertrophic state. These findings provide insight into the societal burden of facial PWS and impact of laser treatment, facilitating objective comparisons with other disparate disease states.

Treatment-Related Decisions in Malignant Gliomas: A Feasibility Study.

Background: Glioma patients make frequent decisions regarding treatment and end-of-life care despite cognitive limitations. We evaluated the feasibility of incorporating the Macarthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T) to assess decision-making ability in glioma patients. Methods: High-grade glioma patients were consented to an IRB-approved prospective study at one of three treatment decision time points. Patients completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and providers informally assessed patient decision-making ability based on neurologic examination. The MacCAT-T, designed to assess patient decision-making domains, was administered by a research assistant. MoCA, provider assessment, and MacCAT-T results were compared to determine whether the MacCAT-T provided additional information. To assess feasibility, we measured administration time and obtained qualitative patient feedback. Results: Eleven patients (median age = 68 years, median Karnofsky Performance Status [KPS] = 80-90) were enrolled. MacCAT-T administration averaged 18.5 minutes. Ninety percent of patients reported "increased knowledge of their treatment options" after taking the MacCAT-T. Clinicians deemed 10 patients to possess sufficient decision-making ability, yet, 6 of them demonstrated impairments in reasoning on the MacCAT-T. Seven patients yielded discordant MOCA and MacCAT-T data, five patients with MOCA score ≥26 showed qualitative MacCAT-T impairments in Reasoning and five patients who scored <21 were within nonimpaired ranges for three of four decision-making domains. Conclusion: MacCAT-T administration was feasible and informative to patients but findings were discordant from MOCA and informal provider assessments. The MacCAT-T may help in identifying mild Reasoning impairments related to patients' initial treatment decisions and should be studied further to determine its role in clinical practice.

Association Between Pain and Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty.

IMPORTANCE: In light of the current opioid crisis, there exists a demonstrated need to balance adequate postrhinoplasty pain control with measured use of narcotics. If pain is inadequately controlled, patients may be unsatisfied with their elective surgical experience. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the association between patient-reported pain outcomes, objective opioid use, and perception of surgical success. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A case series survey study was conducted from July 2018 to January 2019. Consecutive patients who underwent cosmetic and/or functional rhinoplasty by 2 facial plastic surgeons (D.A.S. and L.N.L.) at an academic medical center were surveyed 1 month after surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The number of oxycodone tablets taken, patient-reported pain outcomes, number of narcotic prescription refills, and patient-reported functional and cosmetic outcomes were recorded. Perception of pain, surgical outcome, and oxycodone intake were also evaluated by sex. Demographic information and perception of surgical results were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA statistical software (version 12.0, STATA Corp). Spearman rank order correlation was used for ordinal, monotonic variables with P < .05 being considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Overall, 104 patients were surveyed; 6 were lost to follow-up. Of the participants included, 50 were women with a mean (SD) age of 38 (16.0) years and 48 were men with a mean (SD) age of 38 (16.7) years. Although patients were prescribed a range of 10 to 40 tablets of oxycodone, patients took a mean (SD) of 5.2 tablets (range, 0-23). There were no significant sex differences in perception of pain, perception of outcome, or narcotic use. Among patients undergoing purely functional rhinoplasty, a statistically significant negative association between perception of pain and perception of functional outcome (breathing improvement) was evident. Patients who experienced less pain than they expected had a greater perception of functional improvement (rs = -0.62, P = .001). In contrast, among patients who underwent rhinoplasty with cosmetic improvement, no association was found between pain and perception of surgical outcome (rs = 0.05, P = .64). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: To our knowledge, this is the first study to prospectively evaluate the association between opioid use, patient-reported pain, and perceived surgical success. These data may help guide preoperative counseling because patients who are interested purely in breathing improvement (without cosmetic change) may warrant additional pain-specific counseling to optimize patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.