Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(1): 85-90, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37889045

RESUMEN

Orthognathic surgery often requires extensive orthodontic preparation and a prolonged postoperative recovery that can be stressful for patients and their families. Parents are a primary source of support for patients; accordingly, a better understanding of the parents' experience of orthognathic surgery can help inform clinical care. Using a prospective cross-sectional qualitative study design, 4 focus groups (2 English and 2 Spanish; mean length 65 min) were held with parents of patients who had completed orthognathic surgery for class II/III malocclusion. Thematic content analysis of the group transcriptions was conducted. Participants were 10 mothers and 3 fathers of 12 children (50% with cleft lip/palate) ages 17 to 23 who completed LeFort I (41.7%), LeFort I with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO; 41.7%), or BSSO (16.7%) within the prior 3 to 16 months. Themes fit within a chronological framework: (1) Preparing for Surgery included their larger health context, anticipating surgery, surgery preparation by team and family, and religious faith; (2) Challenges after Surgery consisted of complications, pain, frustration, nutritional challenges, parental anxiety, activity changes, sleep, breathing issues, swelling, and unanticipated aspects of surgery; and (3) Supports after Surgery were nutritional support, appreciation of medical team, postoperative improvements, appearance changes, communicating, supporting patient, and patient coping. Parents also offered advice for families and medical teams. Surgeons and other providers who are part of orthognathic surgical preparation can implement recommendations based on parental experiences to increase patient and family readiness for surgery by providing early education, assisting with advocacy, focusing on nutrition, and supporting coping.


Asunto(s)
Labio Leporino , Fisura del Paladar , Maloclusión de Angle Clase III , Maloclusión Clase II de Angle , Cirugía Ortognática , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos , Niño , Humanos , Labio Leporino/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Fisura del Paladar/cirugía , Maloclusión de Angle Clase III/cirugía , Maloclusión Clase II de Angle/cirugía , Padres
2.
J Craniofac Surg ; 33(3): 744-749, 2022 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34636762

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines for pediatric mandibular reconstruction (PMR) are not well-established. One must consider the growing craniofacial skeleton, mixed dentition, long-term dental occlusion, need for secondary reconstruction, and speech development. The traditional guideline (bone defect > 5 cm) for use of vascularized bone grafts (VBG) is not applicable given the variation of pediatric mandibular size and growth. We seek to propose a novel algorithm for PMR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An Institutional Review Board approved retrospective review of patients who underwent PMR for tumor resections between 2005 and 2019 evaluated patients' demographics, complications, resection index (RI) (resection length to mandibular length), and surgical outcomes. Outcomes based on RI were analyzed to establish guidelines for VBG utilization. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients underwent PMR at a mean age of 9.1 years (range: 1 - 18). The mandibular defect (mean± standard deviation) fornon-VBG (n  = 18) and VBG (n  = 6) was 6.6 ±â€Š3.0 cm and 12.8 ±â€Š4.3 cm, respectively. The VBG group had fewer return trips to the operating room (P  = 0.028) and fewer major complications (P = 0.028). When non-VBG with RI > 32% were compared to <32%, there was statistically less returns to the operating room for complications and a lower rate of early (< 30 days) major complications. DISCUSSION: Our algorithm proposes an RI cutoff of 32% for VBG use for PMR. Patients with a sizable soft tissue defect, previous chemotherapy and/or radiation, planned adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, or a history of failed non-VBG should undergo reconstruction using VBG.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Mandibulares , Reconstrucción Mandibular , Algoritmos , Trasplante Óseo , Niño , Humanos , Mandíbula/cirugía , Neoplasias Mandibulares/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(5): 1780-1784, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33852516

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric mandibular reconstruction requires a grafted segment of sufficient height and stability to support dental implant placement. Double barreling and mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) after reconstruction are two techniques to achieve this, but they have only been reported with fibular grafts. Rib grafts not only have a lower donor site morbidity than fibular grafts, but they also provide adequate defect coverage in children. As such, we propose their use with either a double barrel technique or with MDO. METHODS: Three pediatric patients underwent mandibular resection and reconstruction using rib grafting. One patient underwent single rib graft placement with subsequent vertical rib distraction. In the remaining two patients, a double-barreled rib technique was used, stacked horizontally in one patient and vertically in the other. RESULTS: From March 2018 to May 2019, three patients with an average age of 11 underwent resection of mandibular tumors or tumor-like lesions followed by immediate reconstruction with rib graft. Due to postoperative wound complications, the graft was completely removed in one patient. The remaining two patients had an uneventful recovery with dental implants planned for one and fully osseointegrated in the other. None of the patients experienced donor-site complications. CONCLUSION: This case series supports the utility and versatility of autogenous rib grafts as a reconstructive option in children. Not only is rib an excellent bone source with low donor site morbidity, but its height can be augmented through MDO or double barreling, facilitating the successful placement of implants and oral rehabilitation in pediatric patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Mandibulares , Reconstrucción Mandibular , Trasplante Óseo , Niño , Humanos , Mandíbula/cirugía , Neoplasias Mandibulares/cirugía , Costillas
4.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 56(1): 94-100, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29715060

RESUMEN

Ameloblastic carcinomas are rare malignant lesions with 3 mandibular pediatric cases reported in the literature. We present a case of ameloblastic carcinoma in situ in a 15-year-old male with a right mandibular cystic lesion on computed tomography. The incisional biopsy revealed plexiform ameloblastoma. Due to the infiltrating and aggressive nature of the tumor, the patient underwent hemimandibulectomy and immediate reconstruction with a vascularized osteocutaneous fibula free flap. The final pathology was read as ameloblastic carcinoma in situ. Given the rarity of this disease in the pediatric population, this case report may be a valuable addition to the current literature.


Asunto(s)
Ameloblastoma , Neoplasias Mandibulares , Tumores Odontogénicos , Adolescente , Ameloblastoma/diagnóstico , Ameloblastoma/cirugía , Carcinoma in Situ/diagnóstico , Carcinoma in Situ/cirugía , Niño , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Mandibulares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Mandibulares/cirugía , Tumores Odontogénicos/diagnóstico , Tumores Odontogénicos/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...