RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although HIV-related deaths among people with HIV have dramatically decreased, deaths from other medical conditions and non-medical events have increased. The location of death among people with HIV remains underreported. OBJECTIVES: We reviewed the deaths, causes of death, and reported location of death (i.e. within or outside of medical settings) of all people with HIV with the Southern Alberta Cohort, Calgary, Canada, between 1 January 2010 and 1 January 2022. METHODS: This was a retrospective longitudinal cohort study reviewing all deaths within a comprehensive geographically defined HIV cohort over 11 years. RESULTS: Deaths from HIV-related causes decreased from 52% of all deaths in 2010 to 14% in 2021. In 2021, non-HIV medical deaths increased from 38% to 44%, and non-medical deaths (e.g. violence, suicide, drug overdose) increased from 0.5% to 39%. Of non-medical deaths, 67% resulted from substance use/overdose. Overall, deaths in any medical setting decreased from 91% in 2010 to 39% in 2021; 61% of all deaths occurred in a medical setting (e.g. hospital/emergency department or supported/long-term/hospice care), 27% in a residence, and 9% in the community. CONCLUSION: The shifting causes of death (i.e. fewer HIV-related deaths, more overdose deaths) and location of death (i.e. fewer in medical settings, more at home/in the community) requires close monitoring so future resources can be matched to predicted patient needs.
Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Infecciones por VIH , Humanos , Infecciones por VIH/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Longitudinales , Alberta/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Perspectives from Indigenous peoples and their primary care providers about the quality and impacts of virtual primary care for Indigenous patients are currently limited. This study engaged Indigenous patients and their primary care providers, resulting in four domains being established for an Indigenous patient experience tool for use in virtual primary care. In this paper, we explore the development and finalisation of the Access, Relationships, Quality and Safety (ARQS) tool. METHODS: We re-engaged five Indigenous patient participants who had been involved in the semistructured interviews that established the ARQS tool domains. Through cognitive interviews, we tested the tool statements, leading to modifications. To finalise the tool statements, an Indigenous advisory group was consulted. RESULTS: The ARQS tool statements were revised and finalised with twelve statements that reflect the experiences and perspectives of Indigenous patients. DISCUSSION: The ARQS tool statements assess the four domains that reflect high-quality virtual care for Indigenous patients. By centring Indigenous peoples and their lived experience with primary care at every stage in the tool's development, it captures Indigenous-centred understandings of high-quality virtual primary care and has validity for use in virtual primary care settings. CONCLUSION: The ARQS tool offers a promising way for Indigenous patients to provide feedback and for clinics to measure the quality and safety of virtual primary care practice on the provider and/or clinic level. This is important, as such feedback may help to promote improvements in virtual primary care delivery for Indigenous patients and more widely, may help advance Indigenous health equity.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Equidad en Salud , Humanos , Investigación Cualitativa , Atención Primaria de Salud , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Virtual care has become an increasingly useful tool for the virtual delivery of care across the globe. With the unexpected emergence of COVID-19 and ongoing public health restrictions, it has become evident that the delivery of high-quality telemedicine is critical to ensuring the health and wellbeing of Indigenous peoples, especially those living in rural and remote communities. METHODS: We conducted a rapid evidence review from August to December 2021 to understand how high quality Indigenous primary healthcare is defined in virtual modalities. After completing data extraction and quality appraisal, a total of 20 articles were selected for inclusion. The following question was used to guide the rapid review: How is high quality Indigenous primary healthcare defined in virtual modalities? RESULTS: We discuss key limitations to the delivery of virtual care, including the increasing cost of technology, lack of accessibility, challenges with digital literacy, and language barriers. This review further yielded four main themes that highlight Indigenous virtual primary healthcare quality: (1) limitations and barriers of virtual primary healthcare, (2) Indigenous-centred virtual primary healthcare, (3) virtual Indigenous relationality, (4) collaborative approaches to ensuring holistic virtual care. DISCUSSION: For virtual care to be Indigenous-centred, Indigenous leadership and users need to be partners in the development, implementation and evaluation of the intervention, service or program. In terms of virtual models of care, time must be allocated to educate Indigenous partners on digital literacy, virtual care infrastructure, benefits and limitations. Relationality and culture must be prioritized as well as digital health equity. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight important considerations for strengthening virtual primary healthcare approaches to meet the needs of Indigenous peoples worldwide.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Servicios de Salud del Indígena , Telemedicina , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Among Indigenous peoples in Canada, access to high-quality healthcare remains an important determinant of health. The shift to virtual and remote-based approaches, expedited during the COVID-19 pandemic, influenced the ways in which individuals accessed care and the quality of care received. This study sought to determine which elements are required for effective and sustainable virtual care approaches for delivery of primary care to Indigenous patients and develop quality indicators grounded in Indigenous community and experience. We share a conceptual framework to understand how Indigenous patients access and define high-quality virtual care, grounded in Indigenous patient experiences and worldviews. METHODS: Using principles of patient-oriented research, we grounded this work in social justice and participatory action research. We sought to gain an in-depth understanding of the Indigenous experiences of virtual care and specifically of primary care. This was developed through semistructured interviews with Indigenous patients and Indigenous virtual primary care providers. RESULTS: Thirteen participants were interviewed between 5 August 2021 and 25 October 2021. Using Framework Analysis, we constructed four domains including access, relationships, quality and safety as being primary facets of defining high-quality Indigenous virtual primary care. DISCUSSION: The results presented here indicate that the shift to virtual care, largely seen in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, does not compromise quality of care, nor does it lead to negative patient experiences. Optimal care is possible in virtual settings for some care needs and types of appointments and has the potential to decrease barriers to access and improve patient experiences of safety and quality while facilitating patient/provider relationships. CONCLUSION: In summary, high-quality Indigenous virtual care benefits from attention to patients' experiences of access, relationships, safety and quality with their service providers and healthcare teams.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Humanos , Investigación Cualitativa , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Calidad de la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
With improved life expectancy, the medical records of HIV-infected patients are likely to be transferred repeatedly between HIV caregivers. The challenges, and risk for introducing medical error from incomplete record transfers are poorly understood. We measured number of requests for record transfer, the workload incurred, and explore, using genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing results (GART), the potential risk of incomplete records. Using retrospective database and chart review, we examined all patients followed at the Southern Alberta Clinic between 1 January 2004 and 1 January 2015, and determined how many patients transferred care into and out our program, the associated requests and the workload for record transfer. Using a complete record of all GART tests, the potential importance of absent historic records in current treatment decisions was analyzed. The annual churn rate was 22 ± 3.4%. We received requests for only 70% of patient records who had left our care. Median time for receipt of incoming medical records was 28 days; average clerical time for processing data was 2 hours/record. Of all GART results, 25% exhibited resistance. Of 111 patients with potentially misleading GART results (i.e., documented historical resistance not visible on more recent GART), 34 (30.6%) had moved in from elsewhere. Rigorous maintenance of the continuity of the HIV record is not universally practiced. Resources, costs and logistic challenges as well as a lack of appreciation of risks clearly shown by GART testing, may be relevant barriers. Addressing such issues is pressing as aging and transfers of care are increasingly common.