Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer Invest ; 41(4): 369-378, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36856462

RESUMEN

Neutropenia is the major toxicity of myelosuppressive cancer chemotherapy. Grade 4 neutropenia (Gr4N) is a measure of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) severity. We conducted a meta-analysis of CIN data. Gr4N incidence was significantly correlated with febrile neutropenia (FN), days of severe neutropenia (DSN), and nadir absolute neutrophil count (ANC), which are all important predictors of morbidity. With a Gr4N threshold of 65%, both FN and DSN were below levels for low risk of adverse CIN outcomes. Gr4N was highly predictive for adverse CIN outcomes, and a 65% threshold demarcated low vs. high risk for FN and other adverse CIN outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias , Neutropenia , Humanos , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/efectos adversos , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/epidemiología , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/etiología , Riesgo , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(1): e2145446, 2022 01 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35084480

RESUMEN

Importance: Prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and its clinical consequences is an unmet need for which plinabulin, a selective immunomodulating microtubule-binding agent, is being tested. Objective: To demonstrate noninferiority between plinabulin and pegfilgrastim for days of severe neutropenia in cycle 1 in patients with solid tumors treated with docetaxel. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors (PROTECTIVE-1) double-blind phase 3 randomized clinical trial was performed in multiple centers in China, Russia, Ukraine, and the US. Participants included patients with breast, prostate, or non-small cell lung cancer treated with single-agent docetaxel chemotherapy. Data were collected from June 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019. The database was locked on February 18, 2021. Data analysis was based on intention to treat and safety and performed from October 5, 2018, to February 23, 2021. Interventions: Plinabulin, 40 mg, plus placebo or pegfilgrastim, 6 mg, plus placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was day of severe neutropenia in cycle 1. Additional end points included clinical consequences of CIN (febrile neutropenia, hospitalizations, infections, antibiotic use, and modifications of chemotherapy dose), patient-reported outcomes for bone pain score, markers for immune suppression (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR] of >5), immature neutrophils (band, promyelocyte, and myelocyte counts >0), and safety. Results: Among the 105 patients included in the analysis (65 [6.19%] women; median age, 59 [range, 31-81] years), the primary end point was met within a noninferiority margin of 0.65 days, with a mean difference of 0.52 days (98.52% CI, 0.40-0.65 days). Grade 4 neutropenia frequency in cycle 1 was not significantly different. Plinabulin had earlier onset of action with less grade 4 neutropenia in week 1 of cycle 1. Plinabulin had fewer adverse clinical consequences with rates of febrile neutropenia (0 of 52 vs 1 of 53 [1.9%]), infections (4 of 52 [7.7%] vs 8 of 53 [15.1%]), chemotherapy dose delay of more than 7 days (2 of 52 [3.8%] vs 3 of 53 [5.7%]), and permanent chemotherapy discontinuation (7 of 52 [13.5%] vs 14 of 53 [26.4%]). Patients receiving plinabulin had significantly less bone pain (difference, -0.67 [95% CI, -1.17 to -0.16]; P = .01) and a better immunosuppressive profile (NLR >5 at day 8, 2 of 52 [3.8%] vs 24 of 51 [46.0%]; P < .001). Plinabulin was well tolerated, with comparable safety to pegfilgrastim. Conclusions and Relevance: Plinabulin has comparable efficacy to pegfilgrastim for the prevention of CIN, with better safety and a better immunosuppressive profile. Plinabulin's same-day dosing compared with pegfilgrastim's next-day dosing offers distinct advantages, including reducing use of health care services. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03102606.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Dicetopiperazinas/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel/efectos adversos , Filgrastim/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/prevención & control , Polietilenglicoles/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
JAMA Oncol ; 6(11): e204429, 2020 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32970104

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Plinabulin is a novel, non-granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) small molecule with both anticancer and neutropenia-prevention effects. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of plinabulin compared with pegfilgrastim for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia following docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with non-small lung cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial of 4 treatment arms that was conducted in 19 cancer treatment centers in the United States, China, Russia, and Ukraine. Participants were adult patients with non-small cell lung cancer whose cancer had progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. Data were collected from April 2017 through March 2018 and analyzed from August 2019 through February 2020. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 doses of plinabulin (5, 10, or 20 mg/m2) on day 1 or to pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 2. Patients were treated every 21 days for 4 chemotherapy cycles. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the determination of the recommended phase 3 dose of plinabulin based on the days of severe neutropenia during chemotherapy cycle 1. Daily complete blood cell counts and absolute neutrophil counts were drawn during times of anticipated neutropenia during cycle 1. RESULTS: Of the 55 patients randomized and evaluated, the mean (SD) age was 61.3 (10.2) years, and 38 (69.1%) were men. With each escalation of the plinabulin dose, the incidence of any grade of neutropenia decreased. There were no significant differences in mean (SD) days of severe neutropenia among those treated with pegfilgrastim (0.15 [0.38] days) when dosed at day 2 vs plinabulin 20 mg/m2 (0.36 [0.93] days; P = .76) when dosed at day 1, and no safety signals were detected. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Single dose-per-cycle plinabulin has a similar neutropenia protection benefit as pegfilgrastim. Plinabulin 40 mg fixed dose, which is pharmacologically equivalent to 20 mg/m2, will be compared with pegfilgrastim 6 mg in the phase 3 portion of this trial. Noninferior days of severe neutropenia will be the primary end point, and bone pain reduction, thrombocytopenia reduction, and quality of life maintenance will be secondary end points. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03102606.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Dicetopiperazinas/uso terapéutico , Filgrastim/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neutropenia , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/prevención & control , Polietilenglicoles/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida
4.
Front Physiol ; 8: 786, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29104540

RESUMEN

Exercise and physical labor in extreme environmental conditions causes transient decreases in immune cell and cytokine concentrations, likely increasing the susceptibility to opportunistic infection. Baker's yeast beta glucan (BYBG) has been previously demonstrated to be an effective countermeasure in athletes, but its effectiveness in individuals of average fitness under similar physical stress is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if 10 days of oral supplementation with BYBG could modify previously observed suppression of monocytes, T cells, circulating and whole blood LPS-stimulated cytokines due to strenuous exercise. Venous blood samples were collected from 109 healthy volunteers prior to, immediately after, 2 and 4 h post-exercise. Monocyte and T cell concentration, cell-surface receptor expression and serum and LPS-stimulated cytokines were assessed. BYBG significantly (P < 0.05) altered total and classic monocyte concentration and expression of CD38, CD80, CD86, TLR2, and TLR4 on monocyte subsets. BYBG also significantly increased CD4+ and CD8+ T cell concentration and the exercise response of CCR7+/CD45RA- central memory (TCM) cells. Likewise, BYBG significantly (P < 0.05) altered serum IFN-γ and IL-2, and LPS-stimulated IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-7. Taken together these data support the hypothesis that oral BYBG supplementation modulates the expected exercise response for individuals of average fitness. This may result in a decrease in susceptibility to opportunistic infections after strenuous exercise.

5.
J Biopharm Stat ; 18(4): 611-30, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18607794

RESUMEN

A generic template for clinical trials simulations that are typically required by statisticians is developed. Realistic clinical trials data sets are created using a unifying model that allows general correlation structures for endpoint*timepoint data and nonnormal distributions (including time-to-event), and computationally efficient algorithms are presented. The model allows for patient dropout and noncompliance. A grid-enabled SAS-based system has been developed to implement this model; details are presented summarizing the system development. An example illustrating use of the system is given.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Simulación por Computador , Modelos Estadísticos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Humanos , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...