Lymphedema self-assessment among endometrial cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL), which causes ankle, leg, and feet swelling, poses a significant challenge for endometrial cancer survivors, impacting physical functioning and psychological well-being. Inconsistent LEL diagnostic methods result in wide-ranging LEL incidence estimates. METHODS: We calculated the cumulative incidence of LEL based on survivor-reported Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) responses in addition to survivor- and nurse-reported leg circumference measurements among a pilot sample of 50 endometrial cancer survivors (27 White, 23 Black) enrolled in the ongoing population-based Carolina Endometrial Cancer Study. RESULTS: Self-leg circumference measurements were perceived to be difficult and were completed by only 17 survivors. Diagnostic accuracy testing measures (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value) compared the standard nurse-measured ≥ 10% difference in leg circumference measurements to GCLQ responses. At a mean of ~11 months post-diagnosis, 54% of survivors met established criteria for LEL based on ≥ 4 GCLQ cutpoint while 24% had LEL based on nurse-measurement. Percent agreement, sensitivity, and specificity approximated 60% at a threshold of ≥ 5 GCLQ symptoms. However, Cohen's kappa, a measure of reliability that corrects for agreement by chance, was highest at ≥ 4 GCLQ symptoms (κ = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasize the need for high quality measurements of LEL that are feasible for epidemiologic study designs among endometrial cancer survivors. Future studies should use patient-reported survey measures to assess lymphedema burden and quality of life outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors.

Reconstruction of Scalp Wounds in Patients With Excoriation Disorder.

Excoriation or skin picking disorder is described as compulsive picking of the skin that cannot be explained by an underlying dermatological condition. There are unfortunately no clear guidelines in the literature for reconstruction of wounds in this patient population. The authors describe the cases of 2 patients with the skin picking disorder who underwent free flap reconstruction for scalp wounds, which were complicated by wound recurrence due to manipulation of the surgical site. The literature is reviewed in detail, and steps to potentially prevent recurrence in this patient population are discussed.

Burden of lymphedema in long-term breast cancer survivors by race and age.

BACKGROUND: Risk assessment for breast cancer-related lymphedema has emphasized upper-limb symptoms and treatment-related risk factors. This article examined breast cancer-related lymphedema after surgery, overall and in association with broader demographic and clinical features. METHODS: The Carolina Breast Cancer Study phase 3 followed participants for breast cancer-related lymphedema from baseline (on average, 5 months after breast cancer diagnosis) to 7 years after diagnosis. Among 2645 participants, 552 self-reported lymphedema cases were identified. Time-to-lymphedema curves and inverse probability weighted conditional Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate whether demographics and clinical features were associated with breast cancer-related lymphedema. RESULTS: Point prevalence of breast cancer-related lymphedema was 6.8% at baseline, and 19.9% and 23.8% at 2 and 7 years after diagnosis, respectively. Most cases had lymphedema in the arm (88%-93%), whereas 14% to 27% presented in the trunk and/or breast. Beginning approximately 10 months after diagnosis, younger Black women had the highest risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema and older non-Black women had the lowest risk. Positive lymph node status, larger tumor size (>5 cm), and estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer, as well as established risk factors such as higher body mass index, removal of more than five lymph nodes, mastectomy, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, were significantly associated with increased hazard (1.5- to 3.5-fold) of lymphedema. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight that hazard of breast cancer-related lymphedema differs by demographic characteristics and clinical features. These factors could be used to identify those at greatest need of lymphedema prevention and early intervention. LAY SUMMARY: In this study, the aim was to investigate breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) burden. This study found that risk of BCRL differs by race, age, and other characteristics.

Genital Gender Affirming Surgery.

Genital gender affirming surgery is an effective treatment for gender dysphoria in transgender individuals. Optimization of medical and mental health conditions, including coordination with a patient's entire care team, is essential. Feminizing procedures include vaginoplasty (creation of female genitalia with a vaginal canal) and vulvoplasty (creation of female genitalia with a short or absent vaginal canal). Masculinizing procedures include metoidioplasty (construction of male genitals via local tissue rearrangement) and phalloplasty (creation of a phallus from extra-genital tissue). We aim to provide an overview of genital gender affirming surgery for providers who are interested in learning more about genital gender affirming surgery.

American Society of Plastic Surgeons Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline Revision: Reduction Mammaplasty.

SUMMARY: A multidisciplinary work group involving stakeholders from various backgrounds and societies convened to revise the guideline for reduction mammaplasty. The goal was to develop evidence-based patient care recommendations using the new American Society of Plastic Surgeons guideline methodology. The work group prioritized reviewing the evidence around the need for surgery as first-line treatment, regardless of resection weight or volume. Other factors evaluated included the need for drains, the need for postoperative oral antibiotics, risk factors that increase complications, a comparison in outcomes between the two most popular techniques (inferior and superomedial), the impact of local anesthetic on narcotic use and other nonnarcotic pain management strategies, the use of epinephrine, and the need for specimen pathology. A systematic literature review was performed, and an established appraisal process was used to rate the quality of relevant scientific research (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology). Evidence-based recommendations were made and strength was determined based on the level of evidence and the assessment of benefits and harms.

Dosimetric and Clinical Factors Associated With Breast Reconstruction Complications in Patients Receiving Postmastectomy Radiation.

PURPOSE: Approximately 30% of women who receive postmastectomy radiation therapy in the setting of breast reconstruction suffer from reconstruction complications. This study aims to assess clinical and dosimetric factors associated with the risk of reconstruction complications after postmastectomy radiation therapy, with the ultimate goal of identifying a dosimetric constraint that can be used clinically to limit this risk. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively identified 41 patients who underwent a modified radical or total mastectomy, followed by immediate or delayed reconstruction (autologous or implant-based) and radiation at a single institution between 2014 and 2020. Reconstruction complications were defined as a flap or implant failure, necrosis, capsular contracture, cellulitis/infection, implant rupture, implant malposition, leakage/rupture, unplanned operation, and hematoma/seroma. Clinical and dosimetric variables associated with complications were assessed with univariate analyses. RESULTS: Twelve patients (29%) suffered reconstruction complications, which led to a flap or implant failure in 5 patients. The median time to complication after reconstruction was 8 months. Thirty-two percent of patients with immediate and 20% with delayed reconstruction suffered a complication, respectively. There were no local failures. Smoking (P = .02), use of bolus (P = .03), and the percentage of the chest wall/reconstructed breast target volume that received ≥107% of the prescribed radiation dose (V107) > 11% (P = .03) were associated with increased complication rates. The complication rates were 42% when V107 > 11% versus 12% when V107 < 11%; 58% in smokers versus 17% in nonsmokers; and 42% with versus 7% without bolus. CONCLUSIONS: Plan heterogeneity appears to be associated with the risk of reconstruction complications. Pending further validation, V107 < 11% may serve as a reasonable guide to limit this risk. Further consideration should be given to the selective use of bolus in this setting and optimization of clinical factors, such as smoking cessation.

Vulvoperineal Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Deformities.

IMPORTANCE: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory disorder affecting skin of intertriginous areas that is often encountered and treated by nondermatologic specialists. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this literature review is to provide a comprehensive, clinical source of information on HS as it relates to incidence of disease, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and overall management of this condition. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Sources were obtained through a comprehensive literature search using PubMed and PMC. Various terms were used to query the database, including "hidradenitis suppurativa," "pathogenesis," "prevalence," "management," "surgery," "perineal," and "vulva." RESULTS: Underreported prevalence and unknown pathogenesis have subsequently led to variable approaches in clinical management, often employing a combination of medical and surgical management. CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis and treatment of HS may lead to better disease control and minimize patients' associated morbidity related to disease. RELEVANCE: Knowledge of vulvoperineal hidradenitis is necessary for gynecologists and primary care physicians to ensure early diagnosis, management, and referral for optimal patient outcomes.

A review of gender affirmation surgery: What we know, and what we need to know.

BACKGROUND: Gender-affirmation surgery is a rapidly growing field in plastic surgery, urologic surgery, and gynecologic surgery. These procedures offer significant benefit to patients in reducing gender dysphoria and improving well-being. However, the details of gender-affirmation surgery are less well-known to other surgical subspecialties and other medical subspecialties. The data behind gender-affirmation surgery are comparatively sparse, and due to the recency of the field, large gaps exist in the literature. METHODS: PubMed searches were carried out specific to gender-affirming mastectomies, vaginoplasty, vulvaplasty, mastectomy, metoidioplasty, and phalloplasty. Combinations and variants of "gender affirming," "gender confirming," "transgender," and other variants were used to ensure broad capture. Historical articles were also reviewed. The data gathered were collated and summarized. RESULTS: Gender-affirmation surgery is generally safe. Complication rates for gender-affirming mastectomy and breast augmentation are very low, and complication rates for genital surgeries are also reasonably low. Gender-affirmation surgery decreases rates of gender dysphoria, depression, and suicidality, and significantly improves quality-of-life measures. Data regarding facial gender-affirming surgery are limited. There are very few patient-reported outcome measures specific to gender-affirmation surgery. CONCLUSION: Although the data behind male-to-female gender-affirming surgery are more robust, there are significant gaps in the literature with respect to female-to-male surgery, surgical complication rates for genital surgery, facial masculinization and feminization, and patient-reported outcomes. We therefore present recommendations for further study.

A Review of Reconstruction for Vulvar Cancer Surgery.

IMPORTANCE: Vulvar reconstruction may be required after vulvectomy or any vulvar surgery. Providers should be familiar with techniques for reconstruction to improve clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the different techniques for reconstruction after vulvectomy and describes the decision-making process for selection of appropriate techniques, postoperative care, and expected outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was conducted, focusing on the plastic surgery and gynecologic oncology literature, using the following search terms: "vulvar reconstruction," "perineal reconstruction," "vulvectomy," and "vulvar cancer." The search was limited to English publications. RESULTS: Reconstruction after vulvectomy can be performed using a variety of techniques ranging from simple or complex closure to adjacent tissue rearrangement to skin grafting, locoregional, and free flaps. The appropriate technique is best chosen based on the characteristics of the patient and postablative defect, as well as the reconstructive goals. Postoperative complications are usually minor. CONCLUSIONS: Vulvar reconstruction techniques vary widely and offer patients improved outcomes. RELEVANCE: Knowledge of vulvar reconstruction techniques is necessary for gynecologists performing vulvar surgery to ensure optimal patient outcomes.

Breast Reconstruction Practices and Barriers in West Africa: A Survey of Surgeons.

Access to breast reconstruction is limited in low-income countries. Identifying current barriers that plague both providers and patients can inform future interventions focused on improving access to care. The goal of this study was to delineate perceptions of breast reconstruction among providers in West Africa and define current barriers to care. METHODS: Surveys were administered to surgeons attending the annual meeting of the West African College of Surgeons in 2018. Surgeons were surveyed regarding their practices and perceptions of breast reconstruction. Information on barriers to breast reconstruction focused on patient- and surgeon-related factors was also obtained. A univariate analysis was performed to assess association of demographic and practice information with perceptions of reconstruction barriers. RESULTS: Thirty-eight surgeons completed the questionnaires; 10 of the respondents were plastic surgeons (27%). The survey response rate was 40%. Factors that a majority of surgeons believed to limit access to reconstruction included limited experience (72.9%), resources (76.3%), and a lack of referrals for reconstruction (75%). In total, 76.5% of surgeons had performed <10 breast reconstruction cases in the past year. Two patient factors highlighted by most surgeons (>80%) were a lack of knowledge and concerns about cost. CONCLUSIONS: Perspectives from surgeons in the West African College of Surgeons suggest that barriers in access, patient awareness, surgeon technical expertise, and cost limit the delivery of breast reconstructive services to women in the region. Implementation of interventions focused on these specific metrics may serve as valuable first steps in the movement to increase access to breast reconstruction.

The utility of three-dimensional models in complex microsurgical reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) model printing improves visualization of anatomical structures in space compared to two-dimensional (2D) data and creates an exact model of the surgical site that can be used for reference during surgery. There is limited evidence on the effects of using 3D models in microsurgical reconstruction on improving clinical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing reconstructive breast microsurgery procedures from 2017 to 2019 who received computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans only or with 3D models for preoperative surgical planning were performed. Preoperative decision-making to undergo a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) versus muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flap, as well as whether the decision changed during flap harvest and postoperative complications were tracked based on the preoperative imaging used. In addition, we describe three example cases showing direct application of 3D mold as an accurate model to guide intraoperative dissection in complex microsurgical reconstruction. RESULTS: Fifty-eight abdominal-based breast free-flaps performed using conventional CTA were compared with a matched cohort of 58 breast free-flaps performed with 3D model print. There was no flap loss in either group. There was a significant reduction in flap harvest time with use of 3D model (CTA vs. 3D, 117.7±14.2 minutes vs. 109.8±11.6 minutes; P=0.001). In addition, there was no change in preoperative decision on type of flap harvested in all cases in 3D print group (0%), compared with 24.1% change in conventional CTA group. CONCLUSIONS: Use of 3D print model improves accuracy of preoperative planning and reduces flap harvest time with similar postoperative complications in complex microsurgical reconstruction.

Remote Injuries and Outcomes After Distal Radius Fracture Management.

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fracture (DRF) is a common fracture of the upper extremity. The role of concurrent injuries in patients treated for DRFs is poorly elucidated. The authors sought to determine whether remote injuries were associated with worse outcomes after management of DRFs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including all consecutively seen patients by a university hospital hand service between 2010 and 2015. Preoperative radiographs were analyzed, and patients were managed by surgeon preference and evaluated postoperatively using pain scores. Remote injury was defined as any other injury sustained at the time of fracture not localized to affected extremity. Univariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with risk of complication. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, controlling for confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 181 DRFs in 176 patients were treated over the 5-year period of the study. Forty-eight (26.5%) of the fractures were managed nonoperatively with casting, 12 (6.6%) with closed reduction and pinning, and 119 (65.7%) with open reduction and plating. The mean follow-up was 5.2 months. The complication rate was 18.2%. The most common complication was persistent pain in 5 patients, followed by median neuropathy, loss of reduction, arthritis, and distal radioulnar joint instability. After controlling for age, body mass index, hand surgeon, and other confounders, remote injury was associated with a significantly increased risk of complications ( P = .04, odds ratio: 6.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-34.70). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with remote injuries have a 6-fold increased risk of complications after DRF treatment. The additional risk in these patients should be considered during patient/family counseling and clinical decision-making in DRF management.

Robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap abdominal harvest for breast reconstruction: A case report.

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is a mainstay of autologous breast reconstruction. The da Vinci robot has recently been adapted for an increasing number of reconstructive surgeries. The literature has yet to describe its use for the intra-abdominal harvest of the deep inferior epigastric vessels (DIEV) during DIEP flap breast reconstruction. We show the use of the da Vinci robotic surgical system for the intra-abdominal dissection of DIEV during delayed breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap in a 51-year-old female who had undergone a right modified radical mastectomy. After dissecting the flap from the anterior abdominal wall leaving only the targeted perforating vessels intact, a 1.5 cm fascial incision was made adjacent to the perforator and the vessels were dissected to below the level of the fascia. The intra-abdominal robotic-assisted dissection of the DIEV up to the perforator was then completed. The DIEV were divided at their origin using the robot and the flap removed from the abdomen for subsequent reconstruction. This technique enabled improved precision of flap harvest while also decreasing the donor-site morbidity by minimizing the incision length of the anterior rectus sheath. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and, at 9-month follow-up, exhibited no evidence of flap or donor-site complications, specifically hernia or bulge. This novel approach for the harvest of a DIEP flap introduces an alternative technique to the conventional DIEP flap procedure in the appropriate patient population. Risks inherent to this technique as well as additional costs must be considered.

Complications After Reduction Mammaplasty: A Comparison of Wise Pattern/Inferior Pedicle and Vertical Scar/Superomedial Pedicle.

Reduction mammaplasty is a commonly-performed procedure among plastic surgeons. Although several methods exist, the Wise pattern/inferior pedicle (IP) technique is the most widely used. The vertical scar/superomedial pedicle (SP) technique has gained acceptance for its shorter scar and more durable projection results, but some hesitation remains with its use in larger volume reductions.The incidence of complications in 124 consecutively performed breast reductions (246 breasts) at a single institution using either the Wise pattern/IP technique or vertical scar/SP technique, as well as risk factors associated with them, was determined. Patient demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative details, and major and minor complications were assessed.Ninety (72.6%) patients underwent SP, and 39 patients had IP reductions. Minor infections and wound dehiscence were the most common complications (11 each [8.9%]), followed by minor nonoperative hematomas, 10 (8.1%) and fat necrosis, 7 (5.6%). The mean weight of resected tissue per breast was 692 g. No nipple loss, major complications or reexplorations occurred. Obese, diabetic patients were more likely to undergo IP compared with SP reductions. After adjustment in a multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in complication rates between the 2 methods (IP vs SP: odds ratio, 2.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-8.27; P = 0.09). The results were similar after the analysis was restricted to patients with mean weight of resected tissue per breast greater than 1000 g.There was no significant difference in complications between IP and SP reduction, suggesting that the SP method is a safe alternative to the IP technique, even in macromastia patients undergoing large-volume reductions.

Risk factors associated with complications in lower-extremity reconstruction with the distally based sural flap: a systematic review and pooled analysis.

The distally based sural fasciocutaneous flap is one of the few options available for local flap reconstruction of soft-tissue defects in the lower one-third of the leg. Few studies have assessed risk factors associated with poor outcomes in this flap. A literature search was performed of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library for articles evaluating the use of sural artery fasciocutaneous flaps for soft-tissue reconstruction of the leg. Data were pooled and a univariate analysis was performed to identify characteristics associated with increased morbidity. A logistic regression model was created, and odds ratios and p values associated with the development of complications were calculated. Sixty-one papers were identified which included data on 907 patients. The majority of sural flaps were used to cover defects of the heel (28.2%), foot (14.4%) or ankle (25.8%). Trauma was the most common indication, followed by ulcers and open fractures. Flap complications were recorded in 26.4% of cases with a flap loss rate of 3.2%. With multivariate analysis, venous insufficiency and increasing age were independent risk factors for complications. Patients with venous insufficiency had nine times the risk of developing a complication compared to patients without venous insufficiency.