Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Vaccine ; 35(4): 557-563, 2017 01 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28017426

RESUMEN

Avian bornaviruses are causative agents of proventricular dilatation disease (PDD), a chronic neurologic and often fatal disorder of psittacines including endangered species. To date no causative therapy or immunoprophylaxis is available. Our previous work has shown that viral vector vaccines can delay the course of homologous bornavirus challenge infections but failed to protect against PDD when persistent infection was not prevented. The goal of this study was to refine our avian bornavirus vaccination and infection model to better represent natural bornavirus infections in order to achieve full protection against a heterologous challenge infection. We observed that parrot bornavirus 2 (PaBV-2) readily infected cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) by combined intramuscular and subcutaneous injection with as little as 102.7foci-forming units (ffu) per bird, whereas a 500-fold higher dose of the same virus administered via peroral and oculonasal route did not result in persistent infection. These results indicated that experimental bornavirus challenge infections with this virus should be performed via the parenteral route. Prime-boost vaccination of cockatiels with Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) vectors expressing the nucleoprotein and phosphoprotein genes of PaBV-4 substantially blocked bornavirus replication following parenteral challenge infection with 103.5ffu of heterologous PaBV-2. Only two out of six vaccinated birds had very low viral levels detectable in a few organs. As a consequence, only one vaccinated bird developed mild PDD-associated microscopic lesions, while mock-vaccinated controls were not protected against PaBV-2 infection and inflammation. Our results demonstrate that NDV and MVA vector vaccines can protect against invasive heterologous bornavirus challenge infections and subsequent PDD. These vector vaccines represent a promising tool to combat avian bornaviruses in psittacine populations.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Aves/prevención & control , Bornaviridae/inmunología , Inmunidad Heteróloga , Infecciones por Mononegavirales/veterinaria , Vacunas Virales/inmunología , Animales , Cacatúas , Portadores de Fármacos , Vectores Genéticos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Infecciones por Mononegavirales/prevención & control , Virus de la Enfermedad de Newcastle/genética , Virus Vaccinia/genética , Vacunas Virales/administración & dosificación
2.
Sci Rep ; 6: 36840, 2016 11 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27830736

RESUMEN

Avian bornaviruses are causative agents of proventricular dilatation disease (PDD), an often fatal disease of parrots and related species (order Psittaciformes) which is widely distributed in captive psittacine populations and may affect endangered species. Here, we established a vaccination strategy employing two different well described viral vectors, namely recombinant Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) that were engineered to express the phosphoprotein and nucleoprotein genes of two avian bornaviruses, parrot bornavirus 4 (PaBV-4) and canary bornavirus 2 (CnBV-2). When combined in a heterologous prime/boost vaccination regime, NDV and MVA vaccine viruses established self-limiting infections and induced a bornavirus-specific humoral immune response in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) and common canaries (Serinus canaria forma domestica). After challenge infection with a homologous bornavirus, shedding of bornavirus RNA and viral loads in tissue samples were significantly reduced in immunized birds, indicating that vaccination markedly delayed the course of infection. However, cockatiels still developed signs of PDD if the vaccine failed to prevent viral persistence. Our work demonstrates that avian bornavirus infections can be repressed by vaccine-induced immunity. It represents a first crucial step towards a protective vaccination strategy to combat PDD in psittacine birds.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Aves/prevención & control , Bornaviridae/inmunología , Canarios/virología , Cacatúas/virología , Infecciones por Mononegavirales/veterinaria , Animales , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Enfermedades de las Aves/sangre , Enfermedades de las Aves/inmunología , Enfermedades de las Aves/virología , Canarios/inmunología , Células Cultivadas , Embrión de Pollo , Cacatúas/inmunología , Vectores Genéticos , Inmunidad Humoral , Inmunización Secundaria , Infecciones por Mononegavirales/sangre , Infecciones por Mononegavirales/inmunología , Infecciones por Mononegavirales/prevención & control , Virus de la Enfermedad de Newcastle/genética , Nucleoproteínas/genética , Nucleoproteínas/inmunología , Loros , Fosfoproteínas/genética , Fosfoproteínas/inmunología , Vacunación , Virus Vaccinia/genética , Proteínas Virales/genética , Proteínas Virales/inmunología , Vacunas Virales/inmunología , Esparcimiento de Virus
3.
Vet Microbiol ; 172(1-2): 146-56, 2014 Aug 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24933163

RESUMEN

Avian bornaviruses (ABV) are the causative agents of proventricular dilatation disease (PDD), a widely distributed disease of parrots. Distinct ABV lineages were also found in various non-psittacine avian species, such as canaries, but the pathogenic role of ABV in these species is less clear. Despite the wide distribution of ABV in captive parrots and canaries, its mode of transmission is poorly understood: both horizontal transmission via the urofaecal-oral route and vertical transmission are discussed to play a role. In this study we investigated pathology and horizontal transmission of ABV in domestic canaries (Serinus canaria forma domestica) and cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus), two natural host species commonly used for experimental ABV infections. ABV inoculation resulted in persistent infection of all inoculated animals from both species. ABV-infected cockatiels exhibited PDD-like symptoms, such as neurologic signs or shedding of undigested seeds. In contrast, infected domestic canaries did not develop clinical disease. Interestingly, we did not detect viral RNA in cloacal swabs and organ samples or ABV-specific antibodies in serum samples of contact-exposed sentinel birds from either species at any time during a four months observation period. Our results strongly indicate that horizontal transmission of ABV by direct contact is inefficient in immunocompetent fully fledged domestic canaries and cockatiels.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Aves/transmisión , Canarios/virología , Cacatúas/virología , Infecciones por Mononegavirales/veterinaria , Animales , Enfermedades de las Aves/patología , Enfermedades de las Aves/virología , Bornaviridae/genética , Bornaviridae/patogenicidad , Femenino , Especificidad del Huésped , Masculino , Infecciones por Mononegavirales/patología , Infecciones por Mononegavirales/transmisión , Infecciones por Mononegavirales/virología , ARN Viral/genética , ARN Viral/aislamiento & purificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...