Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer with high tumor burden at biopsy: lessons learned from a contemporary radical prostatectomy cohort.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate whether initial tumor burden at biopsy could predict adverse features after radical prostatectomy (RP) in International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 1 prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in six referral centers. The cohort included patients with ISUP 1 PCa at systematic and MRI-targeted biopsy. We defined a high tumor burden at biopsy if ≥ 20% of cores were positive. The endpoint of the study was adverse features at RP, defined as ≥ pT3a stage and/or N1 and/or ISUP ≥ 3. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess associations between different thresholds on biopsy (percentage of positive cores [PPC] ≥ 25%, ≥ 33%, ≥ 50%, bilateral positivity and positive cores > 3) and adverse features. As the number of targeted biopsies sampled may influence the number of positive cores, we used a virtual biopsy model in which all targeted biopsy results were interpreted as a single targeted biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 312 contemporary patients were included. At final pathology, 99 patients (32%) had adverse features. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, there was no statistical association between PPC > 20% and adverse features (OR = 1.22; 95%CI:0.69-2.22, p = 0.5). In sensitivity analysis, tumor burden at biopsy was not associated with the risk of adverse features, regardless of the definition used (all p > 0.05). When we considered a unique virtual targeted biopsy, tumor burden remained not associated with adverse features (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ISUP 1 PCa tumor burden at biopsy did not predict adverse features in this study, suggesting that it should not be used alone as an exclusion criterion when assessing eligibility for active surveillance.

Micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Microperc) for renal stones, outcomes and learning curve.

OBJECTIVE: To report the effectiveness, reliability and learning curve of Microperc, a minimal invasive percutaneous technique using a 4.85-Ch (16-gauge) sheath, in the treatment of nephrolithiasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 31 consecutive Micropercs for nephrolithiasis<2.5cm were performed by 2 operators in 2 different institutions from the 1st of May 2015 to 31st of December 2017. RESULTS: The mean size of stones was 19mm±11mm, and mean density was 1048±249UH. Stones were located in lower calyx in 21/31(68%), medium calyx in 3/31(10%), pelvis in 4/31(12%) and were multi-caliceal in 3/31(10%). Five patients (16%) had urinary diversion (4 ileal conduits, 1 enterocystoplasty with Mitrofanoff+bladder neck closure) all of those having neurological disease (2 multiple sclerosis, 3 spinal cord injury). Mean operating time was 83±35min and decreased after short period for both operators. 9/31(29%) patients had complication: 8 (26%) had fever (Clavien II) and 1 (3%) had renal colic pain (Clavien III) (required JJ stent). Stone-free was obtained in 13/31(42%) and 11/31(36%) had residual microfragments<3mm which did not require further treatment, corresponding to a technical success of 78% (24/31). Success rate was similar in patients with urinary diversion and patients with normal anatomy. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that Microperc was an effective technic for kidney stone treatment with low complication rate, acceptable operating time and short learning curve. Microperc was useful for stones in the lower calyx and/or urinary diversion where retrograde ureteroscopy could reach its limits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.