EVALUATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN C/T-13910 POLYMORPHISM GENOTYPING RESULTS AND LACTOSE TOLERANCE TEST RESULTS: A RETROSPECTIVE POPULATION-BASED STUDY IN BRAZIL.

BACKGROUND: Lactose tolerant test (LTT) is the most broadly used diagnostic test for lactose intolerance in Brazil, is an indirect, minimally invasive and a low-cost test that is widely available in primary care and useful in clinical practice. The C/T-13910 polymorphism in lactase persistence has been well characterized in Caucasian populations, but there are no studies evaluating the concordance between C/T-13910 polymorphism genotyping results and LTT results in Brazil, where the population is highly mixed. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate agreement between presence of C/T-13910 polymorphism genotyping and malabsorption in LTT results. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a Brazilian population whose data were collected from a single laboratory database present in several Brazilian states. Results of individuals who underwent both genetic testing for lactose intolerance (C/T-13910 polymorphism genotyping) and an LTT from April 2016 until February 2019 were analysed to evaluate agreement between tests. Groups were classified according to age (<10-year-old (yo), 10-17 yo, ≥18 yo groups) and state of residence (São Paulo or Rio Grande do Sul). Results: Among the 404 patients evaluated, there was agreement between the genotyping and LTT results in 325 (80.4%) patients and discordance in 79 (19.6%) patients (k=0.42 -moderate agreement). Regarding the genotype, 47 patients with genotype C/C (lactase nonpersistence) had normal LTT results, and 32 with genotype C/T or T/T (indicating lactase persistence) had abnormal LTT results. Neither age nor state of residence (Rio Grande do Sul or São Paulo) affected the agreement between test results. CONCLUSION: Considering the moderate agreement between C/T-13910 polymorphism genotyping and LTT results (κ=0.42) in the Brazilian population, we hypothesize that an analysis of other polymorphisms could be a strategy to improve the agreement between genotyping and established tests and suggest that additional studies should focus on exploring this approach. BACKGROUND: • Lactose intolerance is highly prevalent and may be implicated as a cofactor, or as a differential diagnosis, in many gastrointestinal conditions. BACKGROUND: • The C/T-13910 polymorphism in lactase persistence is well characterized in Caucasian populations for lactase persistence. BACKGROUND: • Concordance between genotyping and functional tests does not occur in all patients. BACKGROUND: • Brazil has a highly mixed population and knowledge regarding presence of other polymorphisms is of importance in clarifying difficult cases.

Avaliação da concordância entre os resultados da genotipagem do polimorfismo C/T-13910 e do teste de tolerância à lactose: um estudo retrospectivo populacional no Brasil / Evaluation of agreement between c/t-13910 polymorphism genotyping results and lactose tolerance test results: a retrospective population-based study in brazil

ABSTRACT Background: Lactose tolerant test (LTT) is the most broadly used diagnostic test for lactose intolerance in Brazil, is an indirect, minimally invasive and a low-cost test that is widely available in primary care and useful in clinical practice. The C/T-13910 polymorphism in lactase persistence has been well characterized in Caucasian populations, but there are no studies evaluating the concordance between C/T-13910 polymorphism genotyping results and LTT results in Brazil, where the population is highly mixed. Objective: We aimed to evaluate agreement between presence of C/T-13910 polymorphism genotyping and malabsorption in LTT results. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a Brazilian population whose data were collected from a single laboratory database present in several Brazilian states. Results of individuals who underwent both genetic testing for lactose intolerance (C/T-13910 polymorphism genotyping) and an LTT from April 2016 until February 2019 were analysed to evaluate agreement between tests. Groups were classified according to age (<10-year-old (yo), 10-17 yo, ≥18 yo groups) and state of residence (São Paulo or Rio Grande do Sul). Results: Among the 404 patients evaluated, there was agreement between the genotyping and LTT results in 325 (80.4%) patients and discordance in 79 (19.6%) patients (k=0.42 -moderate agreement). Regarding the genotype, 47 patients with genotype C/C (lactase nonpersistence) had normal LTT results, and 32 with genotype C/T or T/T (indicating lactase persistence) had abnormal LTT results. Neither age nor state of residence (Rio Grande do Sul or São Paulo) affected the agreement between test results. Conclusion: Considering the moderate agreement between C/T-13910 polymorphism genotyping and LTT results (κ=0.42) in the Brazilian population, we hypothesize that an analysis of other polymorphisms could be a strategy to improve the agreement between genotyping and established tests and suggest that additional studies should focus on exploring this approach.

RESUMO Contexto: O teste de tolerancia à lactose (TTL) é ampliamente utilizado por ser minimamente invasivo e de baixo custo, disponível na atenção primária e muito útil na prática clínica. Está bem estabelecido o polimorfismo C/T-13910 na persistência da lactase em populações caucasianas, mas não há estudos avaliando a concordância entre os resultados da genotipagem do polimorfismo C/T-13910 e do TTL no Brasil, onde a população é altamente miscigenada. Objetivo: Avaliar a concordância entre a presença do polimorfismo C/T-13910 e a má absorção nos resultados do TTL. Métodos: Análise retrospectiva de dados coletados de um laboratorio presente em vários estados brasileiros. Os resultados dos pacientes que realizaram um teste genético para intolerância à lactose (genotipagem do polimorfismo C/T-13910) e um TTL de abril de 2016 a fevereiro de 2019 foram analisados para avaliar a concordância entre os testes. Os grupos foram classificados de acordo com a idade (<10 anos; 10-17 anos, ≥18 anos) e estado de residência (São Paulo ou Rio Grande do Sul). Resultados: Entre os 404 pacientes avaliados, houve concordância entre os resultados de genotipagem e TTL em 325 (80,4%) pacientes e discordância em 79 (19,6%) pacientes (K=0,42 - concordância moderada). Em relação ao genótipo, 47 pacientes com genótipo C/C (não persistência de lactase) apresentaram TTL normal e 32 com genótipo C/T ou T/T (indicando persistência da lactase) apresentaram TTL anormal. A idade e o estado de residência (Rio Grande do Sul ou São Paulo) não afetaram a concordância entre os resultados dos exames. Conclusão: Considerando a concordância moderada entre a genotipagem do polimorfismo C/T-13910 e os resultados de TTL (κ=0,42) na população brasileira, sugerimos que a análise de outros polimorfismos poderia ser uma estratégia para melhorar a concordância entre os testes.

Transferrin saturation as a surrogate marker for assessment of labile nontransferrin bound iron in chronic liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Increased transferrin saturation (TS) and ferritin are common in hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) but also in chronic liver diseases (CLD). Nontransferrin bound iron (NTBI) is believed to be associated with iron-induced cell damage. We aimed to evaluate NTBI in CLD and their relationship with liver damage. METHODS: Two groups of patients were studied. Group 1 (G1): 94 CLD patients from an Outpatient Hepatology Unit. Group 2 (G2): 36 healthy individuals form a Medical Checkup Clinic. Transferrin iron-binding capacity, TS, ferritin, AST, ALT, and red cell count were performed using standard tests. NTBI was assessed as enhanced labile plasma iron (eLPi). Levels of eLPi less than 0.4 µmol/l were considered within the normal range. RESULTS: Prevalence of increased iron tests (elevated TS and ferritin) was 14% in G1 and 5.5% in G2 ( P = 0.19). Positive NTBI was found in 12 patients (11 in G1 and 1 in G2). Positivity to NTBI was associated with increased iron tests ( P = 0.03), cirrhosis ( P = 0.03) and AST index (ASTI) ( P = 0.03). NTBI was associated with TS of more than 70% ( P = 0.002) but not to elevated ferritin ( P = 0.74). Variables strongly associated with a positive NTBI in univariate analysis (TS > 70%, cirrhosis and ASTI) were submitted to binary regression analysis. TS of more than 70% was the only independent predictive factor ( P = 0.049; odds ratio, 6.8). CONCLUSION: NTBI was associated with TS in CLD, but not with ferritin. NTBI testing could be useful for CLD patients with increased iron tests. Alternatively, a TS of more than 70% can be used as a surrogate marker.