Effects of vortioxetine on functional capacity across different levels of functional impairment in patients with major depressive disorder: a University of California, San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA) analysis.

Objective: To evaluate the consistency of vortioxetine's effects on functional capacity in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and self-reported cognitive symptoms at different levels of functional impairment.Methods: An exploratory analysis of data from a randomized, placebo-controlled, duloxetine-referenced study (NCT01564862) involving 529 patients with moderate to severe MDD treated once-daily with vortioxetine 10/20 mg, duloxetine 60 mg, or placebo for 8 weeks. Analysis of the University of California, San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA) composite scores stratified patients into subgroups by baseline functional impairment and assessed clinically important differences using several cutoffs for change from baseline (CFB) (least-square means) in UPSA composite score. A path analysis was also conducted to determine the proportion of direct versus indirect effects of vortioxetine on functional capacity.Results: Vortioxetine significantly separated from placebo across different baseline levels of functional impairment, particularly at the ≤70 cutoff (mean difference = 5.9, 95% confidence interval, 1.5-10.4). A greater proportion of patients treated with vortioxetine than placebo exhibited UPSA composite score response at each threshold analyzed and were classified as responders based on UPSA CFB of ≥7 (p = 0.006) or ≥9 (p = 0.016). No significant effects were observed for duloxetine versus placebo for any baseline levels of functional impairment or response thresholds. Path analysis demonstrated that 96.9% of the effects on functional capacity can be directly attributed to the treatment effect of vortioxetine and are not mediated by improvements in depressive symptoms as measured by MADRS.Conclusion: The effects of vortioxetine on functional capacity is robust across different level of functional impairment in patients with MDD. The effect on functional capacity was largely independent of the effect on depressive symptoms. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01564862: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01564862; European Clinical Trials Database [EudraCT] Number 2011-005298-22: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2011-005298-22/DE.

What is the overlap between subjective and objective cognitive impairments in MDD?

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairments, such as memory deficits and executive impairment, are common among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and can be captured with objective or subjective assessments. The aim of this post-hoc analysis of the CONNECT study was to assess the degree of overlap between subjective and objective cognitive impairment among MDD patients, and to evaluate associated clinical characteristics. METHODS: The study was conducted from April 2012 to February 2014 and enrolled a total of 602 patients with MDD who reported subjective cognitive impairment. Efficacy was assessed using a battery of objective tests of cognitive function representing multiple domains: Digit Symbol Substitution Test performance, Trail Making Test A, Trail Making Test B, Congruent and Incongruent Stroop Test, Groton Maze Learning Test, Detection Task, Identification Task, and One-Back Task. The Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) was used to capture patient-reported assessments of cognitive function. RESULTS: Although 48% of patients with MDD met our conservative criteria for subjectively defined marked cognitive impairment, 64% of patients with MDD met our conservative criteria for objectively defined cognitive impairment. Therefore, the proportion of patients defined as having impaired cognition was somewhat similar regardless of methodology. Overall, 80% of patients with MDD in this study reported either subjective or objective cognitive impairment per subjective and objective scales. However, the proportion of patients meeting criteria for both subjectively and objectively defined cognitive impairment was only 31%. This could be explained by the fact that the CPFQ total score was only modestly-although significantly-correlated with all but one of the objective tests. CONCLUSIONS: This post-hoc study shows that approximately 80% of patients with MDD participating in an antidepressant trial reported either subjective or objective cognitive impairment.

The effects of vortioxetine on cognitive dysfunction in patients with inadequate response to current antidepressants in major depressive disorder: A short-term, randomized, double-blind, exploratory study versus escitalopram.

BACKGROUND: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by emotional, physical and cognitive symptoms. This study explored the effects of vortioxetine versus escitalopram on outcomes of cognition, functioning and mood symptoms in depressed patients with inadequate response to current antidepressant treatment. METHODS: In this parallel-group, active-comparator study, adult patients (18-65 years, N = 101) with MDD, with inadequate response to current antidepressant monotherapy, were randomized 1:1 to 8 weeks' double-blind treatment with flexible doses (10-20mg/day) of either vortioxetine or escitalopram. Primary and key secondary efficacy measures were the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measurements, and the University of San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment - Brief (UPSA-B), analyzed using analysis of covariance (last observation carried forward method). RESULTS: At week 8, DSST and UPSA-B performance had improved in both treatment groups, with no statistically significant treatment differences. Numerical improvements across measures of cognition, functioning and mood symptoms generally favored vortioxetine. Most adverse events were mild or moderate, with nausea being the most common adverse event. LIMITATIONS: This was an exploratory study with small sample sizes implying limited statistical power. CONCLUSION: Although this explorative study did not meet primary endpoints, the results confirm vortioxetine in doses of 10-20mg/day as an efficacious and well-tolerated antidepressant switch treatment. The overall direction of numerical effect sizes across cognition endpoints support previous findings that vortioxetine specifically benefits cognitive function in MDD.

The effects of vortioxetine on cognitive performance in working patients with major depressive disorder: A short-term, randomized, double-blind, exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a complex disease characterized by emotional, physical and cognitive symptoms. We explored the efficacy of vortioxetine versus placebo on outcomes of cognition, functioning and mood symptoms in working patients with depression, using paroxetine as an active reference. METHODS: Gainfully employed patients (18-65 years, N = 152) with MDD were randomized 1:1:1 to 8 weeks' double-blind, parallel treatment either with vortioxetine (10mg/day) or paroxetine (20mg/day), or with placebo. The primary efficacy measure was the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measurements, and the key secondary efficacy measure was the University of San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment - Brief (UPSA-B), analyzed using analysis of covariance (last observation carried forward). RESULTS: At week 8, DSST and UPSA-B performance had improved relative to baseline in all treatment groups, with no statistically significant differences between treatment groups. While improvements in mood were comparable for vortioxetine and paroxetine, numerical improvements in cognitive performance (DSST) were larger with vortioxetine. Vortioxetine significantly improved overall cognitive performance and clinician-rated functioning relative to placebo. The majority of adverse events were mild or moderate, with nausea being the most common adverse event for vortioxetine. LIMITATIONS: Small sample sizes implied limited statistical power. CONCLUSION: This explorative study showed no significant differences versus placebo in DSST or UPSA-B performance at week 8. However, secondary results support vortioxetine as an effective and well-tolerated antidepressant, supporting an added benefit for cognition and functioning, which could have particular therapeutic relevance for the working patient population.

Determination of a clinically important difference and definition of a responder threshold for the UCSD performance-based skills assessment (UPSA) in patients with major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: This article reports an evaluation of the psychometric properties and clinically important difference (CID) threshold of the UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) in major depressive disorder (MDD), using data from a large-scale study of the effects of vortioxetine on cognitive functioning and functional capacity in MDD patients. METHODS: Adults with moderate-to-severe recurrent MDD and self-reported cognitive dysfunction were randomized to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with vortioxetine 10/20mg QD (flexible), duloxetine 60mg QD, or placebo. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between UPSA composite score and demographic/disease characteristics at baseline to examine construct validity. Two methods (distribution-based and anchor-based) were used to establish a CID threshold. RESULTS: A total of 602 patients were randomized; 528 comprised the full analysis set. For the entire sample mean UPSA composite scores were 77.8 at baseline and 83.9 at week 8 (mean change, +6.1). As hypothesized, at baseline, the UPSA composite score correlated with cognitive functioning (Digit Symbol Substitution Test: r=0.36, P<0.001) and workplace productivity (Work Limitations Questionnaire: r=-0.17, P=0.008), but not depressive symptoms (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale: r=0.02, P=0.707) or subjective cognitive dysfunction (Perceived Deficits Questionnaire: r=-0.02, P=0.698). LIMITATIONS: Two versions of the UPSA were used and no inclusion/exclusion criteria were based on the UPSA. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the construct validity of UPSA for assessing functional capacity independent of mood symptoms. The estimated CID for changes in UPSA scores was quite consistent at +6.4 points and +6.7 based on distribution-based and anchor-based methods, respectively.

Which Cognitive Domains are Improved by Treatment with Vortioxetine?

BACKGROUND: These post hoc analyses evaluated vortioxetine efficacy on cognitive dysfunction in depression. Data were from a double-blind, randomized, fixed-dose, placebo-controlled, 8-week depression study in adults aged 18-65 years (n = 602) with DSM-IV-defined major depressive disorder (MDD). Subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to vortioxetine 10mg/day or 20mg/day or placebo. METHODS: Cognitive function was assessed at baseline, Week 1 (10mg/day only) and Week 8 using Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) number of correct symbols, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Trail Making Test, Stroop test, Simple Reaction Time, and Choice Reaction Time tests. The cognition variables were standardized and used for constructing composite Z-scores for the cognitive domains of executive function, attention/speed of processing, and memory. RESULTS: At Week 1, vortioxetine 10mg/day separated from placebo for attention/speed of processing (standardized composite Z-score = 0.21; p = 0.0238) and DSST number of correct symbols (standardized effect size = 0.18; p = 0.0458) and for executive function (standardized composite Z-score = 0.20; p = 0.0274). At Week 8, vortioxetine 10mg/day and 20mg/day separated from placebo for executive function and attention/speed of processing, with standardized composite Z-scores ranging from 0.35 to 0.49 (all p < 0.01). Standardized composite Z-scores for memory were 0.31 ( p = 0.0036, 10mg/day) and 0.22 ( p = 0.0349, 20mg/day). Standardized effect sizes for DSST were 0.51 ( p < 0.0001, 10mg/day) and 0.52 ( p < 0.0001, 20mg/day). Results are limited by the post hoc nature of the analyses and the absence of an active reference in the original study. CONCLUSIONS: Vortioxetine (10 and 20mg/day) had a multi-domain beneficial effect on cognitive performance, as evidenced by improvements in measures of executive function, attention/speed of processing, and memory. The effect on the DSST may be due to improvements in several cognitive skills.

Effects of serotonin in the hippocampus: how SSRIs and multimodal antidepressants might regulate pyramidal cell function.

The hippocampus plays an important role in emotional and cognitive processing, and both of these domains are affected in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Extensive preclinical research and the notion that modulation of serotonin (5-HT) neurotransmission plays a key role in the therapeutic efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) support the view that 5-HT is important for hippocampal function in normal and disease-like conditions. The hippocampus is densely innervated by serotonergic fibers, and the majority of 5-HT receptor subtypes are expressed there. Furthermore, hippocampal cells often co-express multiple 5-HT receptor subtypes that can have either complementary or opposing effects on cell function, adding to the complexity of 5-HT neurotransmission. Here we review the current knowledge of how 5-HT, through its various receptor subtypes, modulates hippocampal output and the activity of hippocampal pyramidal cells in rodents. In addition, we discuss the relevance of 5-HT modulation for cognitive processing in rodents and possible clinical implications of these results in patients with MDD. Finally, we review the data on how SSRIs and vortioxetine, an antidepressant with multimodal activity, affect hippocampal function, including cognitive processing, from both a preclinical and clinical perspective.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of vortioxetine on cognitive function in depressed adults.

The efficacy of vortioxetine 10 and 20 mg/d vs. placebo on cognitive function and depression in adults with recurrent moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder (MDD) was evaluated. Patients (18-65 yr, N = 602) were randomized (1:1:1) to vortioxetine 10 or 20 mg/d or placebo for 8 wk in a double-blind multi-national study. Cognitive function was assessed with objective neuropsychological tests of executive function, processing speed, attention and learning and memory, and a subjective cognitive measure. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline to week 8 in a composite z-score comprising the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) scores. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). In the pre-defined primary efficacy analysis, both doses of vortioxetine were significantly better than placebo, with mean treatment differences vs. placebo of 0.36 (vortioxetine 10 mg, p < 0.0001) and 0.33 (vortioxetine 20 mg, p < 0.0001) on the composite cognition score. Significant improvement vs. placebo was observed for vortioxetine on most of the secondary objectives and subjective patient-reported cognitive measures. The differences to placebo in the MADRS total score at week 8 were -4.7 (10 mg: p < 0.0001) and -6.7 (20 mg: p < 0.0001). Path and subgroup analyses indicate that the beneficial effect of vortioxetine on cognition is largely a direct treatment effect. No safety concern emerged with vortioxetine. Vortioxetine significantly improved objective and subjective measures of cognitive function in adults with recurrent MDD and these effects were largely independent of its effect on improving depressive symptoms.

Efficacy and safety of vortioxetine (Lu AA21004), 15 and 20 mg/day: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, duloxetine-referenced study in the acute treatment of adult patients with major depressive disorder.

This study assessed the efficacy, tolerability and safety of vortioxetine versus placebo in adults with recurrent major depressive disorder. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study included 608 patients [Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≥ 26 and Clinical Global Impression - Severity score ≥ 4]. Patients were randomly assigned (1 : 1 : 1 : 1) to vortioxetine 15 mg/day, vortioxetine 20 mg/day, duloxetine 60 mg/day or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in MADRS total score at week 8 (mixed model for repeated measurements). Key secondary endpoints were: MADRS responders; Clinical Global Impression - Improvement scale score; MADRS total score in patients with baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale ≥ 20; remission (MADRS ≤ 10); and Sheehan Disability Scale total score at week 8. On the primary efficacy endpoint, both vortioxetine doses were statistically significantly superior to placebo, with a mean difference to placebo (n = 158) of -5.5 (vortioxetine 15 mg, P < 0.0001, n = 149) and -7.1 MADRS points (vortioxetine 20 mg, P < 0.0001, n = 151). Duloxetine (n = 146) separated from placebo, thus validating the study. In all key secondary analyses, both vortioxetine doses were statistically significantly superior to placebo. Vortioxetine treatment was well tolerated; common adverse events (incidence ≥ 5%) were nausea, headache, diarrhea, dry mouth and dizziness. No clinically relevant changes were seen in clinical safety laboratory values, weight, ECG or vital signs parameters. Vortioxetine was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder.

A schizophrenia rat model induced by early postnatal phencyclidine treatment and characterized by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Better animal models are needed to aid the development of new medications to alleviate the cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia. Growing evidence suggests neurodevelopmental insults and disturbances in NMDA receptor (NMDAR) signaling to be involved in the schizophrenia etiology. Acute administration of phencyclidine (PCP) induces schizophrenia-like symptoms in healthy volunteers and exacerbates symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. In this study, pharmacological Magnetic Resonance Imaging (phMRI) was used to evaluate if rats treated with 20mg/kg PCP on postnatal days 7, 9, and 11 (neoPCP), compared to saline (neoVeh), were hypersensitive to acute PCP administration in adulthood (acutePCP). Intravenous administration of 0.5mg/kg acutePCP produced robust and sustained relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) increase in discrete frontal, neocortical, hippocampal, thalamic, and limbic brain structures in both neoPCP:acutePCP and neoVeh:acutePCP rats compared to acute saline treatment (Vehicle control group). AcutePCP injection significantly increased the rCBV response in the medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens compared to the Vehicle control group, without distinguishing neoPCP and neoVeh animals. However, at late time points (25-33min post acutePCP injection), neoPCP animals showed significantly higher rCBV values compared to the Vehicle control group, suggesting an altered sensitivity toward NMDAR blockade in adult rats subjected to this neurodevelopmental procedure. In combination with the observed cognitive deficits revealed in this animal model, the present findings indicate that altered NMDAR signaling might underlie the symptomatic changes seen in schizophrenia, adding to the construct and face validity of this model.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, duloxetine-referenced, fixed-dose study comparing the efficacy and safety of Lu AA21004 in elderly patients with major depressive disorder.

The efficacy and tolerability of Lu AA21004 at 5 mg/day, a novel multimodal antidepressant, were assessed in elderly patients with recurrent major depressive disorder. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to Lu AA21004 5 mg/day, duloxetine 60 mg/day (reference) or to placebo in an 8-week double-blind study. The primary efficacy measure was the 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D(24)) total score (analysis of covariance, last observation carried forward). Patients (mean age 70.6 years) had a mean baseline HAM-D(24) score of 29.0. Lu AA21004 showed significantly (P = 0.0011) greater improvement on the primary efficacy endpoint compared with placebo at week 8 (3.3 points). Duloxetine also showed superiority to placebo at week 8, thereby validating the study. HAM-D(24) response (53.2 vs. 35.2%) and HAM-D(17) remission (29.2 vs. 19.3%) rates at endpoint were higher for Lu AA21004 than for placebo. Lu AA21004 showed superiority to placebo in cognition tests of speed of processing, verbal learning and memory. The withdrawal rate due to adverse events was 5.8% (Lu AA21004), 9.9% (duloxetine) and 2.8% (placebo). Whereas nausea was the only adverse event with a significantly higher incidence on treatment with Lu AA21004 (21.8%) compared with placebo (8.3%), the incidence of nausea, constipation, dry mouth, hyperhidrosis and somnolence was higher for duloxetine. In conclusion, Lu AA21004 was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of elderly patients with recurrent major depressive disorder.

Pharmacokinetics of sertindole and its metabolite dehydrosertindole in rats and characterization of their comparative pharmacodynamics based on in vivo D2 receptor occupancy and behavioural conditioned avoidance response.

The objectives of this study were to characterize the pharmacokinetics of sertindole and its active metabolite dehydrosertindole in rats and to evaluate the central modulatory and behavioural pharmacodynamics including a competitive interaction model between the compounds. Following oral administration of sertindole or dehydrosertindole, the plasma concentration-time courses were determined in conjunction with striatal dopamine D(2) receptor binding. In addition, the behavioural effects were recorded in the conditioned avoidance response (CAR) paradigm. A one-compartment model with Michaelis-Menten elimination best described the pharmacokinetics of sertindole. Formation of dehydrosertindole was incorporated into the pharmacokinetic model and exhibited first-order elimination. PK/PD modelling after administration of dehydrosertindole resulted in potency estimates of 165 and 424 ng/ml for D(2)-occupancy (Kd) and CAR measurements (EC(50)), respectively. The pharmacokinetics of the parent-metabolite system was integrated into a competitive pharmacodynamic E(max) model in order to quantitate the potency of sertindole with the pharmacodynamic parameters of the metabolite taken into account. Based on this approach, effect compartment concentrations of sertindole needed to attain 50% occupancy and half-maximal effect in the CAR paradigm were 133 and 338 ng/ml, respectively. The corresponding potency-estimates obtained after conventional modelling of the sertindole data without accounting for the metabolite amounted to 102 and 345 ng/ml. Based on competitive PK/PD analysis of the parent-metabolite interaction, the relative contribution of dehydrosertindole to the overall pharmacological effect after sertindole administration in rats appeared to be of minor significance. This could mainly be ascribed to the relatively low extent of bioconversion of sertindole into dehydrosertindole in this species.

Reversal of cognitive deficits by an ampakine (CX516) and sertindole in two animal models of schizophrenia--sub-chronic and early postnatal PCP treatment in attentional set-shifting.

RATIONALE: Therapies treating cognitive impairments in schizophrenia especially deficits in executive functioning are not available at present. OBJECTIVE: The current study evaluated the effect of ampakine CX516 in reversing deficits in executive functioning as represented in two animal models of schizophrenia and assessed by a rodent analog of the intradimensional-extradimensional (ID-ED) attentional set-shifting task. The second generation antipsychotic, sertindole, provided further validation of the schizophrenia-like disease models. METHODS: Animals were subjected to (a) sub-chronic or (b) early postnatal phencyclidine (PCP) treatment regimes: (a) Administration of either saline or PCP (5 mg/kg, intraperitonally b.i.d. for 7 days) followed by a 7-day washout period and testing on day 8. (b) On postnatal days (PNDs) 7, 9, and 11, rats were subjected to administration of either saline or PCP (20 mg/kg, subcutaneously (s.c.)) and tested on PNDs 56-95, after reaching adulthood. The single test session required rats to dig for food rewards in a series of discriminations following acute administration of either vehicle, or CX516 (5-40 mg/kg, s.c.), or sertindole (1.25 mg/kg, perorally). RESULTS: The specific extradimensional deficits produced by sub-chronic or early postnatal PCP treatment were significantly attenuated by sertindole and dose-dependently by CX516. CONCLUSION: Findings here further establish PCP treatment as model of executive functioning deficits related to schizophrenia and provide evidence that direct glutamatergic interventions could improve these, when assessed in the ID-ED attentional set-shifting task.

Antipsychotic-like effect of retigabine [N-(2-Amino-4-(fluorobenzylamino)-phenyl)carbamic acid ester], a KCNQ potassium channel opener, via modulation of mesolimbic dopaminergic neurotransmission.

Dopaminergic (DAergic) neurons in the ventral tegmental area express both KCNQ2 and KCNQ4 channels, which opening is expected to decrease neuronal excitability via neuronal hyper-polarization. Because psychotic symptoms are believed to be associated with an increased excitability of dopamine (DA) cells in the mesencephalon, KCNQ channels might represent a new potential target for the treatment of psychosis. The aim of our study was to investigate the antipsychotic-like potential of KCNQ channel opening via modulation of neuronal activity within the mesolimbic DAergic system. We report that retigabine [N-(2-amino-4-(fluorobenzylamino)-phenyl)carbamic acid ester], a KCNQ opener, dose-dependently reduced basal DA firing rate and more potently suppressed burst firing activity in the ventral tegmental area, whereas XE-991 [10,10-bis(pyridinylmethyl)-9(10H)-anthracenone], a selective KCNQ blocker, induced opposite effects. In addition, retigabine prevented d-amphetamine-induced DA efflux in the nucleus accumbens and d-amphetamine-induced locomotor hyperactivity. In contrast, XE-991 potentiated both the locomotor hyperactivity and DA efflux evoked by d-amphetamine. These data strongly suggest that the activation of KCNQ channels attenuates DAergic neurotransmission in the mesolimbic system, particularly in conditions of excessive DAergic activity. In a model predictive of antipsychotic activity, the conditioned avoidance response paradigm, retigabine was found to inhibit avoidance responses, an effect blocked by coadministration of XE-991. Furthermore, retigabine was found to significantly inhibit the hyperlocomotor response to a phencyclidine (PCP) challenge in PCP-sensitized animals, considered as a disease model for schizophrenia. Taken together, our studies provide evidence that KCNQ channel openers represent a potential new class of antipsychotics.

Using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling as a tool for prediction of therapeutic effective plasma levels of antipsychotics.

In the rat, selective suppression of conditioned avoidance response has been widely reported as a test with high predictive validity for antipsychotic efficacy. Recent studies have shown that the relationship between dopamine D2 receptor occupancy and the suppression of conditioned avoidance response behaviour correlates well with the relationship between human dopamine D2 receptor occupancy and clinical effect. The aim of the present study was to evaluate how pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) predictions of therapeutic effective steady-state plasma levels by means of conditioned avoidance response behaviour in rodents, correlate with clinically relevant plasma exposure for the classical antipsychotic drug haloperidol and four second generation antipsychotics: sertindole, clozapine, risperidone and olanzapine, including selected metabolites. In order to confirm the validity of the present conditioned avoidance response procedure, in vivo striatal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy was determined in parallel using 3H-raclopride as the radioligand. The PK/PD relationship was established by modelling the time-response and time-plasma concentration data. We found the order of dopamine D2 receptor occupancy required to suppress conditioned avoidance response behaviour according to EC50 measurements to be sertindole (+dehydrosertindole)=dehydrosertindole=paliperidone (the metabolite of risperidone)=haloperidol=olanzapine>risperidone>>clozapine. Overall, a good agreement was observed between the rat dopamine D2 receptor occupancy levels providing 50% response in the conditioned avoidance response test and the dopamine D2 receptor occupancy levels reported from responding schizophrenic patients treated with antipsychotics. Predictions of therapeutically effective steady-state levels for sertindole (+dehydrosertindole) and olanzapine were 3-4-fold too high whereas for haloperidol, clozapine and risperidone the predicted steady-state EC50 in conditioned avoidance responding rats correlated well with the therapeutically effective plasma levels observed in patients. Accordingly, the proposed PK/PD model may act as a guide for determining effective plasma concentrations of potential antipsychotics in the clinical setting and thereby accelerating the overall drug development process.

Evaluation of a neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia--early postnatal PCP treatment in attentional set-shifting.

Phencyclidine (PCP) was administered to male and female Lister hooded rats on postnatal days (PND) 7, 9 and 11. All PCP animals tested in adulthood (PND 53-93) showed deficits in cognitive flexibility, specifically in their ability to shift attentional set, compared to controls. This novel finding is reminiscent of the impairment observed in schizophrenia patients, and supports the validity of the early postnatal PCP regimen as a disease-like model.

Classical as well as novel antipsychotic drugs increase self-stimulation threshold in the rat--similar mechanism of action?

Antipsychotic drugs given acutely increase the threshold for intracranial self-stimulation elicited from the ventral tegmental area. As all the antipsychotic drugs share the dopamine D2-receptor antagonism it is reasonable to believe that this is the cause for suppression of intracranial self-stimulation behaviour. The objective of this investigation was to examine the effect of classical (haloperidol) as well as novel antipsychotic drugs (clozapine, olanzapine and sertindole) on intracranial self-stimulation behaviour. Furthermore, the effects of different specific receptor antagonists on intracranial self-stimulation behaviour were examined. Our results showed that both the classical (haloperidol) and the three novel antipsychotic drugs increase the threshold for intracranial self-stimulation. The results obtained with the receptor specific antagonists showed that dopamine D2, alpha1-adrenoceptor and serotonin 5-HT2A receptor antagonisms inhibit intracranial self-stimulation behaviour and that muscarinic receptor antagonism is without effect. Even though all the tested antipsychotic drugs inhibited intracranial self-stimulation behaviour, there seems to be a difference in their ratio between doses that inhibits intracranial self-stimulation behaviour and those that produce antipsychotic effect in a preclinical model (amphetamine hyperactivity). Sertindole was the only antipsychotic drug able to produce antipsychotic effect without significant inhibition of intracranial self-stimulation behaviour at a narrow dose interval. The remaining antipsychotic drugs all inhibited intracranial self-stimulation behaviour at equal or lower doses than those producing antipsychotic effect.

Positive modulation of glutamatergic receptors potentiates the suppressive effects of antipsychotics on conditioned avoidance responding in rats.

Non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist administration induces a syndrome indistinguishable from schizophrenia including positive and negative symptoms and cognitive deficits. Concordantly, augmentation of the NMDA receptor function by glycine-site agonists such as D-serine and D-cycloserine has been reported to improve negative symptoms and some cognitive deficits in schizophrenia patients when added to conventional antipsychotic treatment, although they appear less effective when combined with clozapine specifically. In contrast, administration of the AMPAkine CX-516 (which positively modulate the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) receptor) as an adjuvant to clozapine, has been shown to exert some beneficial action on the negative symptoms and cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. In the rat, selective suppression of conditioned avoidance response (CAR) behaviour has been widely reported to be a test with high predictive validity for antipsychotic efficacy. We found that D-serine and CX-516, at doses ineffective by themselves, significantly potentiated the suppression of CAR induced by threshold doses of risperidone (0.16 mg/kg, s.c.), olanzapine (0.63 mg/kg, s.c.) and clozapine (1.3 mg/kg, s.c.) without causing additional motor disturbances. Thus, the adjunct enhancement of NMDA or AMPA receptor function observed clinically, appears reflected in the present rat CAR study. Consequently, our data lend further support to the potential use of the CAR test in the investigation of augmentation strategies involving the addition of non-dopaminergic target compounds to existing atypical antipsychotics.