RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The Hyperview® is a hyperspectral camera, which can be used to assess the microcirculation of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM). It measures local tissue oxygenation in concentrations of oxyhemoblobin (OXY), deoxyhemoglobin (DEOXY), and O2-saturation (O2-SAT) in arbitrary units. The aim of this validation study is to assess whether the Hyperview® is able to monitor microcirculatory changes after revascularization in patients with PAD. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, 50 patients with PAD were included who were scheduled for endovascular, hybrid, or open revascularization. The ankle-brachial index (ABI), systolic toe pressure (TP) (in case of DM), and a set of Hyperview® measurements of the plantar region were recorded before and after treatment. Changes in pre- and postoperative measurements were assessed with the paired t-test. RESULTS: Some 38 patients underwent endovascular revascularization and eight patients underwent hybrid or open vascular surgical revascularization. After revascularization, the ABI improved from 0.58 to 0.80 (p < 0.001). OXY increased from 72.6 to 77.8 (p = 0.134). DEOXY decreased from 69.1 to 55.0 (p < 0.001). O2-SAT increased from 51.3 to 58.1 (p < 0.001). TP improved from 50.6 to 61.9 mmHg (p = 0.065) but was measured in only 16 patients. CONCLUSION: The Hyperview® is able to observe changes in the microcirculation after revascularization in terms of DEOXY and O2-SAT. The results of this study are a promising step into the validation of the Hyperview®.
Asunto(s)
Imágenes Hiperespectrales , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Microcirculación , Estudios Prospectivos , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Índice Tobillo BraquialRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The Hyperview® is a novel camera that applies hyperspectral imaging to project local concentrations of oxyhaemoglobin (OXY), deoxyhaemoglobin (DEOXY) and O2-saturation (O2-SAT) in a map. In this pilot validation study, we assessed inter - and intra-observer agreement for measuring OXY, DEOXY and O2-SAT in healthy participants. METHODS: The plantar region of the right foot was assessed with the Hyperview® in 50 healthy participants. Two consecutive pictures were taken by the same observer, followed by two images by a second observer. Measurements were performed without and with standardization (a static device for both the foot and the Hyperview camera). Inter- and intra-observer agreements were expressed as Intraclass Correlation coefficients (ICC) with their 95% confidence interval (CI). A score <0.40 indicates poor agreement, 0.40-0.59 fair, 0.60-0.74 good and 0.75-1.00 excellent agreement. Bland and Altman plots were also generated. RESULTS: Without standardization, the ICC values between the observers for OXY, DEOXY and O2-SAT ranged from 0.70 to 0.83. The intra-observer agreement of both observers ranged from 0.36 to 0.83. With standardization, the ICC values between the observers ranged from 0.80 to 0.82 and intra-observer agreement varied from 0.75 to 0.92. Four Bland and Altman plots were generated of the measurements of OXY by observers 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: When standardization is used, the Hyperview® camera is a reliable device with excellent intra- and inter-observer agreements for the assessment of OXY, DEOXY and O2-SAT. In future research, the inter- and intra-observer agreements of the camera should be investigated in patients with diabetes and/or peripheral arterial disease.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Proyectos Piloto , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A hibernoma is a rare benign lipomatous tumour, consisting of brown and white fat cells. In general, a hibernoma is an asymptomatic swelling that increases slowly in size, but it can sometimes cause pain. CASE DESPRIPTION: A 62-year-old woman presented at the breast clinic with a painful swelling in the right breast that was increasing in size. Radiological examination initially suggested a hamartoma. However, on the basis of histological examination of a biopsy, the diagnosis of hibernoma was made. The hibernoma was removed surgically. CONCLUSION: A hibernoma of the breast can grow to such a size that pain can arise due to compression of the mammary parenchyma. Surgical resection is only indicated if the hibernoma causes symptoms or for cosmetic reasons.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Lipoma/diagnóstico , Dolor/etiología , Biopsia , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Lipoma/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/diagnósticoRESUMEN
We present the case of a 57-year-old woman with a large (7 x 5 cm), asymptomatic lumbar swelling. A lumbar MRI scan revealed a hernia of the superior lumbar triangle (Grynfeltt-Lesshaft hernia). Thus far, 300 cases have been described in the literature. Therapeutic options include surgical and conservative treatment.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Abdominal/patología , Región Lumbosacra/patología , Edema , Femenino , Hernia Abdominal/diagnóstico , Hernia Abdominal/terapia , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Non-operative management (NOM) is the standard of care in hemodynamically stable patients with blunt splenic injury after trauma. Splenic artery embolization (SAE) is reported to increase observation success rate. Studies demonstrating improved splenic salvage rates with SAE primarily compared SAE with historical controls. The aim of this study was to investigate whether SAE improves success rate compared to observation alone in contemporaneous patients with blunt splenic injury. METHODS: We included adult patients with blunt splenic injury admitted to five Level 1 Trauma Centers between January 2009 and December 2012 and selected for NOM. Successful treatment was defined as splenic salvage and no splenic re-intervention. We calculated propensity scores, expressing the probability of undergoing SAE, using multivariable logistic regression and created five strata based on the quintiles of the propensity score distribution. A weighted relative risk (RR) was calculated across strata to express the chances of success with SAE. RESULTS: Two hundred and six patients were included in the study. Treatment was successful in 180 patients: 134/146 (92 %) patients treated with observation and 48/57 (84 %) patients treated with SAE. The weighted RR for success with SAE was 1.17 (0.94-1.45); for complications, the weighted RR was 0.71 (0.41-1.22). The mean number of transfused blood products was 4.4 (SD 9.9) in the observation group versus 9.1 (SD 17.2) in the SAE group. CONCLUSIONS: After correction for confounders with propensity score stratification technique, there was no significant difference between embolization and observation alone with regard to successful treatment in patients with blunt splenic injury after trauma.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/terapia , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Bazo/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Arteria Esplénica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the routine performance of urinalysis in patients with a blunt trauma mechanism is still valuable. METHODS: Consecutive patients aged ≥16â years, admitted to a Dutch Level 1 trauma centre between January 2008 and August 2011, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Results of urinalysis (erythrocytes per µL) were divided into no, microscopic or macroscopic haematuria. Patients were divided into four groups based on whether a urinalysis was performed or not, with or without imaging for urogenital injury. Main outcome measures were the presence of urogenital injury and whether the findings on urine specimen and/or imaging led to clinical consequences. RESULTS: A total of 1815 patients were included. The prevalence of intra-abdominal and urogenital injuries was 13% and 8%, respectively. In 1363 patients (75%), urinalysis was performed and 1031 patients (57%) underwent imaging for urogenital injury as well. The presence of macroscopic haematuria (n=16) led to clinical consequences in 73% of the patients (11 out of 15), regardless of the findings on imaging. Microscopic haematuria on urinalysis in combination with no findings on imaging led to clinical consequences in 8 out of 212 patients (4%). Microscopic haematuria on urinalysis in patients who did not have imaging for urogenital injury did not lead to clinical consequences (0 out of 54 patients; 0%). All the 8 patients who underwent an intervention had positive findings on imaging. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not support the routine performance of urinalysis in patients admitted with a blunt trauma mechanism. Although urinalysis could be valuable in specific patient populations, we should consider omitting this investigation as a routine part of the assessment of trauma patients.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/normas , Urinálisis/normas , Sistema Urogenital/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Abdominales/orina , Adulto , Femenino , Hematuria/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/orinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The incidence of splenectomy after trauma is institutionally dependent and varies from 18% to as much as 40%. This is important because variation in management influences splenic salvage. The aim of this study was to investigate whether differences exist between Dutch level 1 trauma centers with respect to the treatment of these injuries, and if variation in treatment was related to splenic salvage, spleen-related reinterventions, and mortality. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients who were admitted between January 2009 and December 2012 to five academic level 1 trauma centers were identified. Multinomial logistic regression was used to measure the influence of hospital on treatment strategy, controlling for hemodynamic instability on admission, high grade (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma 3-5) splenic injury, and injury severity score. Binary logistic regression was used to quantify differences among hospitals in splenic salvage rate. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients were included: 149 (59%) were observed, 57 (23%) were treated with splenic artery embolization and 47 (19%) were operated. The observation rate was comparable in all hospitals. Splenic artery embolization and surgery rates varied from 9%-32% and 8%-28%, respectively. After adjustment, the odds of operative management were significantly higher in one hospital compared with the reference hospital (adjusted odds ratio 4.98 [1.02-24.44]). The odds of splenic salvage were significantly lower in another hospital compared with the reference hospital (adjusted odds ratio 0.20 [0.03-1.32]). CONCLUSIONS: Although observation rates were comparable among the academic trauma centers, embolization and surgery rates varied. A nearly 5-fold increase in the odds of operative management was observed in one hospital, and another hospital had significantly lower odds of splenic salvage. The development of a national guideline is recommended to minimalize splenectomy after trauma.
Asunto(s)
Bazo/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Adulto , Embolización Terapéutica , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros TraumatológicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Trauma systems have data registries in order to describe and evaluate (the quality of) trauma care. If results between centres and countries (benchmarking) are to be compared, data has to be accurate, reliable and complete. All trauma registries deal with incompleteness. A contributor to incompleteness of the data is failure to include patients that fulfil the criteria; the so-called missing patients. The aim of this study is to assess the number of missing patients in our regional trauma registry and to identify predictors for being missing from the trauma registry. METHODS: A random sample was taken. Four calendar weeks from 2012 were selected and medical files of all consecutive presentations to the emergency department or trauma room during those weeks were studied. Patients who were already correctly included in the trauma registry were assigned to the 'included' group and patients who should have been but were not to the 'missing' group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for being missed from the trauma registry. RESULTS: Of a total of 338 patients, 50 (15%) were identified as missing. Characteristics of the missing patients did not differ substantially from the included patients. Transfer to another hospital after initial assessment and presentation in a Level 3 hospital compared to a Level 1 hospital were independent predictors for being missed from the trauma registry, with an adjusted odds ratio of 5.86 (95% CI: 2.08-16.52) and 6.64 (95% CI: 1.86-23.78), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 15% of the patients who met the inclusion criteria of the trauma registry were not included in the registry. Special attention should be paid to patients who are transferred to other hospitals in the network after initial assessment and to registration in Level 3 hospitals.
Asunto(s)
Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Adulto , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Incidencia , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management is the standard of care in hemodynamically stable patients with blunt splenic injury. However, a number of issues regarding the management of these patients are still unresolved. The aim of this study was to reach consensus among experts concerning optimal treatment and follow-up strategies. METHODS: The Delphi method was used to reach consensus among 30 expert trauma surgeons and interventional radiologists from around the world. An online survey was used in the two study rounds. Consensus was defined as an agreement of 80% or greater. RESULTS: Response rates of the first and second rounds were 90% and 80%, respectively. Consensus was reached for 43% of the (sub)questions. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma organ injury scale for grading splenic injury is used by 93% of the experts. In hemodynamically stable patients, observation or splenic artery embolization (SAE) can be applied in the presence of a small or no hemoperitoneum combined with an intraparenchymal contrast extravasation or no contrast extravasation, regardless of the presence of an arteriovenous (AV) fistula/pseudoaneurysm. Hemodynamic instability is an indication for operative management, irrespective of computed tomographic characteristics and grade of splenic injury (≥82% of the experts). Operative management is also indicated in the presence of associated intra-abdominal injuries and/or the need for five or more packed red blood cell transfusions (22 of 27 experts, 82%). Recommended time span to start SAE in a stable patient with an intraparenchymal contrast extravasation is 60 minutes (19 of 24 experts). Patients should be admitted 1 to 3 days to a monitored setting (27 of 27 experts, 100%). Serial hemoglobin checks are performed by all experts, every 4 to 6 hours in the first 24 hours and once or twice a day after that (21 of 24 experts, 88%), in nonoperative management as well as after SAE. Routine postdischarge imaging is not indicated (21 of 24 experts, 88%). CONCLUSION: Although treatment should always be adjusted to the specific patient, the results of this study may serve as general guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Bazo/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Adulto , Recolección de Datos , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Bazo/patología , Bazo/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Heridas no Penetrantes/patología , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Contradictory findings are reported in the literature concerning prognostic factors for failure of nonoperative management (NOM) in the treatment of adults with blunt splenic injury. The objective of this systematic review was to identify prognostic factors for failure of NOM, with or without angiography and embolization. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched. Prospective or retrospective cohort studies addressing failure of nonoperative treatment, with and/or without angiography and embolization, of blunt abdominal injuries were included. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 335 titles and abstracts were screened, of which 31 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. No randomized controlled trials were found. Ten articles were qualified as high-quality articles and used for data extraction (best-evidence synthesis). A total of 25 prognostic factors were investigated, of which 14 were statistically significant in one or more studies. Strong evidence exists that age of 40 years or above, Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 25 or greater, and splenic injury grade of 3 or greater are prognostic factors for failure of NOM. Moderate evidence was found for a splenic Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 or greater, trauma and ISS of less than 0.80, the presence of an intraparenchymal contrast blush, as well as transfusion of 1 unit of packed red blood cells or more. Limited evidence was found for large hemoperitoneum, lower Revised Trauma Score, lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, lower systolic blood pressure, male sex, the presence of traumatic brain injury, and splenic embolization as protective factor for failure of NOM. CONCLUSION: Awareness for failure of NOM is required in patients aged 40 years or older, in patients with an ISS of 25 or higher or those with splenic injury grade 3 or higher. The prognostic factors for failure that we identified should be confirmed in future prospective cohort studies or meta-analyses using individual patient data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, level III.
Asunto(s)
Bazo/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Angiografía , Embolización Terapéutica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Factores Sexuales , Bazo/irrigación sanguínea , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In recent years there has been increasing interest shown in the nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt traumatic injury. The growing use of NOM for blunt abdominal organ injury has been made possible because of the progress made in the quality and availability of the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scan and the development of minimally invasive intervention options such as angioembolization. AIM: The purpose of this review is to describe the changes that have been made over the past decades in the management of blunt trauma to the liver, spleen and kidney. CONCLUSIONS: The management of blunt abdominal injury has changed considerably. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination has replaced diagnostic peritoneal lavage as diagnostic modality in the primary survey. MDCT scanning with intravenous contrast is now the gold standard diagnostic modality in hemodynamically stable patients with intra-abdominal fluid detected with FAST. One of the current discussions in the literature is whether a whole body MDCT survey should be implemented in the primary survey. The progress in imaging techniques has contributed to NOM being currently the treatment of choice for hemodynamically stable patients. Angioembolization can be used as an adjunct to NOM and has increased the success rate to 95%. However, to date many controversies exist about the optimum patient selection for NOM, the proper role of angioembolization in NOM, the best technique and material to use in angioembolization, and the right follow-up strategy of patients sustaining blunt abdominal injury. Conducting a well-designed prospective clinical trial or a Delphi study would be preferable.
RESUMEN
Local formation of the sphingomyelin metabolite sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) within the vascular wall has been shown to modulate vascular reactivity. In this study we investigated whether sphingosine kinase, the enzyme responsible for S1P synthesis, plays a role in muscarinic receptor-mediated NO production and vascular relaxation in different blood vessel types. For this purpose, sphingosine kinase translocation and sphingolipid-dependent NO-production after muscarinic receptor stimulation were assessed in an endothelial cell line. Furthermore, we used the sphingosine kinase inhibitor N,N-dimethylsphingosine (DMS) to investigate the role of sphingosine kinase in the relaxant responses to the muscarinic agonist methacholine (MCh) in isolated rat aorta and mesenteric arteries. Activation of M(3)-receptors in an endothelial cell line induced a fast translocation of YFP-tagged sphingosine kinase-1 from the cytosol to the plasma membrane. Concomitant NO-production in this cell line was partially inhibited by DMS. Accordingly, in rat aorta the relaxant responses to MCh were attenuated in the presence of DMS, while the responses to the NO-donor sodium nitroprusside were unaltered. In contrast, DMS enhanced the relaxant responses to MCh in mesenteric artery preparations. This effect could also be observed in the presence of NO synthase and cyclooxygenase inhibitors, indicating that sphingosine kinase inhibition specifically enhanced endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated (i.e. non-NO and non-prostacyclin-dependent) relaxation. We conclude that sphingosine kinase differentially regulates vascular tone in different vessel types, enhancing NO-dependent vasorelaxation but counteracting EDHF-dependent vasorelaxation. This observation enhances our understanding of the complex mechanisms by which sphingolipids regulate vascular homeostasis. Moreover, a disturbed regulation of sphingolipid metabolism in the vascular wall may therefore play a role in the aetiology/pathology of disease states characterized by endothelial dysfunction.