Eustachian tube calcification as an unusual finding on a panoramic radiograph.

The author herein presents an unusual case of eustachian tube calcification masquerading as loose radiopacities in the temporomandibular joints on a panoramic image, creating a diagnostic challenge. The patient, a 72-year-old woman, presented to the dental service for implant treatment to improve her masticatory function. A cone-beam computed tomography scan was performed and reviewed by a board-certified oral and maxillofacial radiologist. The scan showed no evidence of calcifications in the temporomandibular joints; however, it revealed nodular calcifications within the cartilaginous portion of the eustachian tube bilaterally. Additionally, this report briefly reviews the differential diagnosis of calcified loose bodies in the temporomandibular joint and provides information that needs to be reinforced periodically.

Inflammatory Lesions of the Jaws.

This article defines the fascial and spatial anatomy of the suprahyoid neck region, delineates the role of CT and MR imaging, discusses the inflammatory conditions of the jaws and adjacent spaces and their clinical symptomatology, and illustrates the appearance of these conditions.

Malignant Lesions of the Oral Region.

This article focuses on the radiographic presentations of various malignant conditions that affect the oral region and delineates the role of CT, MR imaging, and PET in oral cancer imaging.

Imaging Evaluation of the Temporomandibular Joint.

This article describes the anatomy and function of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), provides an overview of the various imaging modalities available for evaluating the TMJ, and discusses a variety of miscellaneous diseases that affect the TMJ.

Cysts and Benign Odontogenic Tumors of the Jaws.

This article addresses jaw lesions including cysts and benign odontogenic tumors in terms of their definition and clinical and imaging features and discusses pertinent differential diagnoses..

Imaging of Maxillofacial Injuries.

This article reviews the system of facial buttresses and discusses the role of diagnostic imaging in the evaluation of the patient with maxillofacial trauma.

Optimizing the use of panoramic radiography for determining the position of impacted permanent maxillary canines.

The purpose of this research was to test the reliability of a modified magnification method for determining the position of an impacted canine from a single panoramic radiograph. This retrospective study evaluated 114 panoramic radiographs showing 136 impacted maxillary canines. The widths of the impacted canines, contralateral erupted canines, and ipsilateral maxillary incisors were measured, and ratios for the canine-incisor index (CII) and canine-canine index (CCI) were calculated. The impacted canines were also classified according to their location in the vertical plane (apical, middle, or coronal zone) relative to the contralateral central incisor. Continuous data were analyzed for normal distribution, and logistic and multivariate logistic regression models were conducted. The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure with a false discovery rate of 0.05 was used to account for multiple testing. The intrarater reliability was excellent for impacted canine, central incisor, and contralateral canine measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). The CII and vertical zone were strong predictors of an impacted canine position with clinically useful sensitivity and specificity values (0.69 and 0.74, respectively, based on an area under the curve concordance statistic of 0.75). A predictive range was evident for the CII of palatally (1.10-1.39) and buccally (0.90-1.19) impacted canines in the middle and coronal zones, respectively. The occurrence of palatal or buccal positioning was not significantly associated with the CCI (P = 0.2). The CII and vertical zone identified from a single panoramic radiograph can be used to determine the buccopalatal position of an impacted canine, with more reliability if the impacted canine crown is in the middle or coronal zone of the contralateral central incisor.

The Moth-Eaten Mandible: Osteomyelitis.

Inflammatory lesions such as osteomyelitis of the jaw may share some of the radiographic features of malignancy; however, a demonstrable dental cause for it usually exists. In addition, inflammatory lesions generally stimulate a sclerotic bone reaction, which is uncommon in malignancy. The imaging modality of choice for aiding in the differential diagnosis is computed tomography imaging because of its ability to clearly delineate sequestra and periosteal new bone formation.

Comparison of two 3-dimensional user-friendly voxel-based maxillary and 2-dimensional superimposition methods.

INTRODUCTION: Cephalometric superimpositions have many uses in orthodontics, including growth evaluation and outcome assessment. However, 2-dimensional (2D) cephalograms can be distorted and yield incomplete 2D data. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging provides a 3-dimensional (3D), undistorted, and more complete patient analysis. CBCT imaging provides many unique advantages to the orthodontic practice and can influence how treatment outcomes are assessed. This study aimed to investigate the validity of 3D maxillary voxel-based superimpositions compared with the 2D method recommended by the American Board of Orthodontists. METHODS: This retrospective study included pretreatment and posttreatment CBCT images of 30 adolescent patients. The images were superimposed using the 3D voxel-based tools in Dolphin Imaging software (Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions, Chatsworth, Calif). Two different 3D anatomic registration areas (3DA-3DB) were tested for the validity and reproducibility of the 3D maxillary superimpositions as compared with the 2D method. Linear and angular measurements were used to evaluate the dental changes of the maxillary right central incisor and first molar. Data distribution was normal by the Shapiro-Wilk W test. A mixed model analysis of variance test was done to compare the 3 superimposition types within each subject, followed by pairwise Tukey-Kramer comparisons when indicated. RESULTS: After applying the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to control the false discovery rate at 0.05 with multiple testing, the U1 vertical difference was statistically significant (P <0.0001) for the superimposition method, though the mean differences were clinically nonsignificant (0.52 mm, 0.76 mm). The U1 angular and U6 vertical differences were not statistically significant for the superimposition method (P = 0.3636 and P = 0.1863, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The 3D voxel-based maxillary superimpositions showed similar results to conventional 2D superimpositions recommended by the American Board of Orthodontists.