Semispinalis Cervicis Sarcopenia is Associated With Worsening Cervical Sagittal Balance and Junctional Alignment Following Posterior Cervical Fusion for Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The present study is the first to investigate whether cervical paraspinal sarcopenia is associated with cervicothoracic sagittal alignment parameters after posterior cervical fusion (PCF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have investigated the association between sarcopenia and postoperative outcomes after cervical spine surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing PCF from C2-T2 at a single institution between the years 2017-2020. Two independent reviewers utilized axial cuts of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences to perform Goutallier classification of the bilateral semispinalis cervicis (SSC) muscles. Cervical sagittal alignment parameters were compared between subgroups based upon severity of SSC sarcopenia. RESULTS: We identified 61 patients for inclusion in this study, including 19 patients with mild SSC sarcopenia and 42 patients with moderate or severe SSC sarcopenia. The moderate-severe sarcopenia subgroup demonstrated a significantly larger change in C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (+6.8 mm) from the 3-month to 1-year postoperative follow-up in comparison to the mild sarcopenia subgroup (-2.0 mm; P =0.02). The subgroup of patients with moderate-severe sarcopenia also demonstrated an increase in T1-T4 kyphosis (10.9-14.2, P =0.007), T1 slope (28.2-32.4, P =0.003), and C2 slope (24.1-27.3, P =0.05) from 3-month to 1-year postoperatively and a significant decrease in C1-occiput distance (6.3-4.1, P =0.002) during this same interval. CONCLUSIONS: In a uniform cohort of patients undergoing PCF from C2-T2, SSC sarcopenia was associated with worsening cervicothoracic alignment from 3-month to 1-year postoperatively.

Ultralong Follow-Up of Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Harrington Instrumentation vs Uninstrumented Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Harrington instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) was revolutionary and allowed patients to mobilize faster as compared with patients treated with uninstrumented fusion. However, Harrington instrumentation provided correction of the deformity in 1 plane, resulting in limited sagittal plane control. Patients who received these 2 surgeries are aging, and to date, ultralong follow-up of these patients has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term patient-reported outcomes and radiographic parameters after Harrington nonsegmental distraction instrumentation vs uninstrumented fusion in the treatment of AIS. METHODS: Fourteen adult patients with AIS who were previously instrumented (n = 7) or uninstrumented (n = 7) were identified. Recent x-ray image measurements such as pelvic incidence (PI), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) were used to analyze deformities. Scoliosis Research Society-7 (SRS-7), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate patient-reported outcomes. Complications and rates of revision surgery were also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age was 67.1 ± 5 years in the instrumented group and 64.1 ± 9 years in the uninstrumented group. There were no significant differences between instrumented and uninstrumented in SRS-7 (23.4 ± 2.9 vs 23.6 ± 2.6, P = 0.93), NDI (5.7 ± 4.5 vs 10.6 ± 4.5, P = 0.08), and ODI (9.7 ± 13.7 vs 9.4 ± 8.7, P = 0.99). Radiographic measurements of instrumented vs uninstrumented resulted in comparable PT (24.0 ± 7.9 vs 30.5 ± 4.7, P = 0.09), PI (61.3 ± 16.9 vs 67.2 ± 9.5, P = 0.47), LL (34.9 ± 14.4 vs 42.8 ± 11.0, P = 0.29), PI-LL (26.4 ± 25.1 vs 24.3 ± 10.4, P = 0.43), and SVA (38.1 ± 30.1 vs 52.3 ± 21.6, P = 0.37). There were 2 patients in the instrumented group who developed adjacent segment disease that required operative intervention compared with none in the uninstrumented group (P = 0.46). CONCLUSION: In long-term follow-up of instrumented and uninstrumented fusion, patients had similar patient-reported outcomes and radiographic parameters, although the instrumented cohort had higher rates of adjacent segment disease.

Multifidus Sarcopenia Is Associated With Worse Patient-reported Outcomes Following Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The present study is the first to assess the impact of paraspinal sarcopenia on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: While the impact of sarcopenia on PROMs following lumbar spine surgery is well-established, the impact of sarcopenia on PROMs following PCDF has not been investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing PCDF from C2 to T2 at a single institution between the years 2017 and 2020. Two independent reviewers who were blinded to the clinical outcome scores utilized axial cuts of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences to assess fatty infiltration of the bilateral multifidus muscles at the C5-C6 level and classify patients according to the Fuchs Modification of the Goutalier grading system. PROMs were then compared between subgroups. RESULTS: We identified 99 patients for inclusion in this study, including 28 patients with mild sarcopenia, 45 patients with moderate sarcopenia, and 26 patients with severe sarcopenia. There was no difference in any preoperative PROM between the subgroups. Mean postoperative Neck Disability Index scores were lower in the mild and moderate sarcopenia subgroups (12.8 and 13.4, respectively) than in the severe sarcopenia subgroup (21.0, P <0.001). A higher percentage of patients with severe multifidus sarcopenia reported postoperative worsening of their Neck Disability Index (10 patients, 38.5%; P =0.003), Visual Analog Scale Neck scores (7 patients, 26.9%; P =0.02), Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Component Scores (10 patients, 38.5%; P =0.02), and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Mental Component Scores (14 patients, 53.8%; P =0.02). CONCLUSION: Patients with more severe paraspinal sarcopenia demonstrate less improvement in neck disability and physical function postoperatively and are substantially more likely to report worsening PROMs postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Anatomical Parameters for Occipital Condyle Screws: An Analysis of 500 Condyles Using CT Scans.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: To establish occipital condyle dimensions (length, width, height), as well as the medialization angle necessary for safe occipital condyle screw placement in occipitocervical fixation. METHODS: Between 1/2014-6/2014, patients who presented to a single level 1 academic trauma center emergency room and received computed tomography (CT) imaging of the cervical spine as part of routine clinical care were identified. After excluding patients with cervical fractures, neoplastic disease, or infection, 500 condyles representing 250 patients were analyzed. Condyle length, height, and width (all reported in millimeters [mm]) were evaluated on the sagittal, coronal, and axial series, respectively. Medialization angle (reported in degrees) was evaluated on the axial series of CT imaging. Measurements were compared by sex and age. RESULTS: The average condyle length, width, and height were 18.6 millimeters (mm) (range, 14.5-23.0 mm), 10.5 mm (range, 7.4-13.8 mm), and 11.3 mm (7.1-15.3 mm), respectively. Additionally, the average occipital condyle medialization angle was 23° (range, 14-32°). Occipital condyles of men were significantly longer, wider, and taller (all comparisons, p < 0.05). The medialization angle was significantly steeper for women than men (p < 0.05). No measurement differences were appreciated by age. CONCLUSION: Our findings are similar to previous studies in the field; however, length appears slightly shorter. Further, measurement differences were appreciated by sex but not age. Thus, our measurement findings emphasize the importance of preoperative planning utilizing individual patient anatomy to ensure safe placement of occipital condyle screws for optimal outcomes.

Do Surgical Site Infection Rates Differ Among Microscope-assisted Versus Loupe-assisted Lumbar Discectomies?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compared surgical site infection (SSI) rates between patients under lumbar discectomy with an operative microscope versus surgical loupes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar decompressions for herniated disks or lumbar stenosis are common spine procedures. Some studies have raised the concern that drape contamination of the operative microscope may be an additional risk for SSIs. We hypothesize that the use of the operative microscope for lumbar decompression procedures does not increase infection rates. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on patients undergoing lumbar spinal decompressions via microscopic assistance (MA) or loupe assistance (LA) by 2 orthopedic spine surgeons at a tertiary academic medical center. Patients treated from November, 2012 to October, 2016 were enrolled. Variables including age, sex, race, body mass index, smoking status, length of surgery, intraoperative complications, estimated blood loss, and postoperative SSIs within 30 days were collected. RESULTS: A total of 225 patients were included in the study. Sixty-three patients underwent LA lumbar decompression, and 162 underwent MA lumbar decompression. There were 72 female individuals/90 male individuals in the MA group and 31 female individuals/33 male individuals in the LA group. The MA was significantly older 45.2 versus 40.4 in LA, P-value of 0.02 and had a significantly higher body mass index (30.64 vs. 27.79, P<0.002). SSI rates were not significantly different, MA 3.7% (6/162) and LA 7.9% (5/63), P-value of 0.14. The MA group had a significantly longer operative time (92 vs. 50 min, P<0.001). Dural tears rates were 3.1% in MA and 1.6% in LA, P-value of 0.3 and were associated with longer operative time in the MA group, 162.2 versus 90.2 minutes, P-value of <0.0001. Multivariate regression analysis did not identify any significant differences between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the operative microscope had similar infection rates as LA microdiscectomies. In academic institutions, the operative microscope may allow more opportunities for residents or fellows to partake/assist in the procedure as compared with LA procedures.

Online Ratings of Spine Surgeons: Analysis of 208 Surgeons.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the online ratings of spine surgeons and variables that may affect online ratings. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Physician review Web sites (PRW) are rapidly growing for-profit businesses. Most orthopedic surgeons are rated on at least one PRW as are other surgical specialists. To date the online ratings of spine surgeons have not been evaluated. METHODS: Cervical Spine Research Society surgeon ratings on five physician rating Web sites were performed in April 2016: "healthgrade.com," "vitals.com," "ratemd.com," "webmd.com," and "yelp.com." Numeric ratings from the PRWs were standardized on a scale of 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating positive ratings. Sex, practice sector (academic or private), specialty (orthopedics or neurosurgery), geographic location, and years of practice were also collected. RESULTS: A total of 209 spine surgeons were included in our study. Of the 209 spine surgeons, 208 (99.52%) were rated at least once in one of the five PRWs. Average number of ratings per surgeon was 2.96. Average rating was 80 (40-100). There were four female (1.92%) and 204 male surgeons (98.1%). There were 121 (58.2%) in academic practice and 87 (41.8%) in private practice. There were 175 (84.1%) orthopedic surgeons and 33 (15.9%) neurosurgeons. Most of the surgeons were Caucasian 163 (78.4%) and worked in the South and Northeast 135 (64.9%). Those in academic practice had significantly higher ratings (81.6 vs. 77.65; P = 0.026). Number of years in practice was significantly associated with ratings (P = 0.0003) with those in practice for 21 or more years having significantly lower ratings. CONCLUSION: In this first study evaluating the online ratings of spine surgeons, we found that 99.5% of spine surgeon had at least one rating on a PRW. The average score, 80, indicated mostly positive ratings. Being in practice for 20 years or less and being in academic practice significantly associated with higher ratings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Odontoid Fracture in a Patient With Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis.

Nonoperative management of fractures in the setting of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) or ankylosing spondylitis is often unsuccessful. The subaxial spine is a common site of hyperextension fractures in the setting of DISH. Fractures of the upper cervical spine are uncommon in DISH. We report, to our knowledge, the first case describing successful nonoperative management of a type 2 odontoid fracture in a patient with DISH. We discuss the patient's initial presentation, physical examination, imaging findings, and management. A 73-year-old male presented with neck pain to the emergency department after sustaining a ground-level fall. Computed tomography of the cervical spine demonstrated a minimally displaced type 2 odontoid fracture in the setting of extensive DISH. He was immobilized with a hard cervical collar as the definitive management of his fracture. The collar was discontinued after 3 months. At his 2-year follow-up, he had a stable fibrous nonunion at the fracture site with tolerable neck pain. Flexion-extension radiographs demonstrated a stable alignment, and nonoperative management was continued. In selected patients with odontoid fractures in the setting of DISH, there is a role for nonoperative management alongside close monitoring.

Evaluating Problems With Footwear in the Geriatric Population.

Foot pathologies are common in nearly 80% of all elderly patients, and studies have indicated inappropriate footwear as one of the major underlying cause. It has been postulated that ill-fitting shoe wear affects plantar pressure, thus exacerbating weak balance. Complications arising from foot pathologies, which include difficulty in maintaining balance, have increased the risk of falls that can result in fractures and other serious injuries. The link between footwear and the onset or progression of certain foot pathologies has emphasized the need to explore and promote preventative measures to combat the issue. Wider and higher toe boxed shoes, along with sneakers, are examples of footwear documented to evenly distribute plantar pressure, increase comfort, and facilitate appropriate balance and gait. Ultimately, the use of appropriate footwear can help to better stabilize the foot, thus reducing the risk of sustaining debilitating physical injuries known to drastically decrease the quality of life among the geriatric population.

Heterotopic ossification after hemiarthroplasty of the hip - A comparison of three common approaches.

OBJECTIVE: Heterotopic ossification (HO) about the hip after total hip arthroplasty and internal fixation of the hip, pelvis, and acetabulum has been linked to surgical approach. However, no study has investigated surgical approach and HO in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty. We therefore aimed to explore the influence of operative approach in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty. METHODS: Through a retrospective case series at an Urban level I trauma center, we found 80 patients over the age of 60 undergoing hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures from 2000 to 2009. Patient charts, operative notes, and radiographs were reviewed for demographics, operative approach (anterior: A, anterior-lateral: AL, posterior: P), and any development of HO. Fisher's exact test compared rates of HO among the three approaches. Student's t-tests compared Brooker Classification levels of HO among the approaches. RESULTS: 82 hemiarthroplasties (26 A, 32 AL, 24 P) were included for analysis. 22 patients (27%) had HO. There was no significant difference in the development of HO based upon surgical approach: A: 19% (n = 5); AL: 34% (n = 11); P: 25% (n = 6). There was a significant difference in the grade of HO based on Brooker Classification (BC) with the posterior approach resulting in significantly lower grade of HO: A (BC: 2.60); AL (BC: 2.64); P (BC: 1.50) (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Our data is the first to evaluate surgical approach and HO in patients with hemiarthroplasty. Patients have a significant risk of developing higher grade HO based on surgical approach (A or AL). Orthopedists should be mindful of these risks when considering A or AL approaches.