RESUMEN
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is increasingly common, particularly in the older and multimorbid population. Surgical proficiency in management is required in the early years of U.K. neurosurgical training with most cases performed by nonconsultant-grade surgeons. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effect of surgeon seniority on recurrence for patients with CSDH. Full-text articles comparing surgical treatment for CSDH with a "senior" (consultant/attending level) or "junior" (resident/registrar or similar) lead surgeon were identified. MEDLine and EMBASE databases were searched. The primary outcome of this study was recurrence. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and mortality rate. A random effects meta-analysis was performed. The risk of bias was assessed using the National Institute of Health risk of bias toolkit. Five studies were included in the final analysis (n = 941 total patients). Individually, no study identified a significant difference in recurrence rate and postoperative complications between senior and junior neurosurgeons. On meta-analysis, junior-led evacuations had lower recurrence rates on pooled univariable analysis (12.0% vs. 17.9% [odds ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.78, I2 = 0%]) (3 studies). Seniority of surgeon was not associated with increased rates of recurrence patients undergoing CSDH surgery. Complexity of operation may be a confounding factor in observed lower recurrence rates with more junior operators.
RESUMEN
A chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is a collection of aged blood between the dura and the brain, typically treated with surgical evacuation. Many patients with CSDH have comorbidities requiring the use of antithrombotic medications. The optimal management of these medications in the context of CSDH remains unknown, as the risk of recurrence must be carefully weighed against the risk of vaso-occlusive events. To better understand these risks and inform the development of clinical practice guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, searching Medline and Embase databases. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023397061). A total of 44 studies were included, encompassing 1 prospective cohort study and 43 retrospective cohort studies. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for CSDH recurrence and vaso-occlusive events in patients taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications compared to patients not receiving antithrombotic therapy. GRADE was used to assess the quality of evidence. In patients on anticoagulant therapy at CSDH diagnosis, the pooled OR for CSDH recurrence was 1.41 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.79; I2 = 28%). For patients on antiplatelet therapy, the pooled OR was 1.31 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.58; I2 = 32%). Patients taking antithrombotic medications had a significantly higher risk of vaso-occlusive events, with a pooled OR of 3.74 (95% CI 2.12 to 6.60; I2 = 0%). There was insufficient evidence to assess the impact of time to recommence antithrombotic medication on CSDH outcomes. We found that baseline antithrombotic use is associated with the risk of CSDH recurrence and vaso-occlusive events following surgical evacuation. The evidence base is of low quality, and decisions regarding antithrombotic therapy should be individualised for each patient. Further high-quality, prospective studies or registry-based designs are needed to better inform clinical decision-making and establish evidence-based guidelines.
