Rationale, Design, and Baseline Characteristics of the CURRENT AS Registry-2.

BACKGROUND: There is scarce data evaluating the current practice pattern and clinical outcomes for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), including both those who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and those who were managed conservatively in the TAVI era.Methods and Results: The Contemporary outcomes after sURgery and medical tREatmeNT in patients with severe Aortic Stenosis (CURRENT AS) Registry-2 is a prospective, physician-initiated, multicenter registry enrolling consecutive patients who were diagnosed with severe AS between April 2018 and December 2020 among 21 centers in Japan. The rationale for the prospective enrollment was to standardize the assessment of symptomatic status, echocardiographic evaluation, and other recommended diagnostic examinations such as computed tomography and measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide. Moreover, the schedule of clinical and echocardiographic follow up was prospectively defined and strongly recommended for patients who were managed conservatively. The entire study population consisted of 3,394 patients (mean age: 81.6 years and women: 60%). Etiology of AS was degenerative in 90% of patients. AS-related symptoms were present in 60% of patients; these were most often heart failure symptoms. The prevalence of high- and low-gradient AS was 58% and 42%, respectively, with classical and paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS in 4.6% and 6.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CURRENT AS Registry-2 might be large and meticulous enough to determine the appropriate timing of intervention for patients with severe AS in contemporary clinical practice.

Early and mid-term results of left ventricular volume reduction surgery for dilated cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate structure-oriented left ventricular volume reduction surgery (LVVRS). The purpose of this study was to report the early and mid-term results of left volume reduction surgery for dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). METHODS: We performed LVVRS on 29 patients with DCM. The age of the patient ranged from 8 to 73 years (mean 58 +/- 18 years). There were 19 male patients (63%). Twenty-three patients were ischemic, 5 were non-ischemic, and 1 had salcoidosis. Twenty-three patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV. Fourteen patients underwent the Dor operation, 11 underwent a septal anterior ventricular exclusion operation, and 6 underwent a modified Batista operation. Fifteen patients underwent mitral annuloplasty and 2 patients had mitral valve replacement. All patients were divided into two groups, a Dor group (n = 14) and non-Dor group (n = 15). Postoperative early results and mid-term survival rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 13.8% (4/29). The causes of death were low-output syndrome (n = 3) and septic shock (n = 1). Survival rate was 80% at 1 year and 72% at 3 years. Two-year survival rate of Dor and non-Dor groups were 69.8% and 93.8%, respectively (p = 0.099). CONCLUSIONS: Early and mid-term results of LVVRS were satisfied, and the non-Dor operation tended to be superior in mid-term survival to the Dor operation. Long-term follow-up is warranted.