United States anesthesiologists over 50: retirement decision making and workforce implications.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesiology is among the medical specialties expected to have physician shortage. With little known about older anesthesiologists' work effort and retirement decision making, the American Society of Anesthesiologists participated in a 2006 national survey of physicians aged 50-79 yr. METHODS: Samples of anesthesiologists and other specialists completed a survey of work activities, professional satisfaction, self-defined health and financial status, retirement plans and perspectives, and demographics. A complex survey design enabled adjustments for sampling and response-rate biases so that respondents' characteristics resembled those in the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. Retirement decision making was modeled with multivariable ordinal logistic regression. Life-table analysis provided a forecast of likely clinical workforce trends over an ensuing 30 yr. RESULTS: Anesthesiologists (N = 3,222; response rate = 37%) reported a mean work week of 49.4 h and a mean retirement age of 62.7 yr, both values similar to those of other older physicians. Work week decreased with age, and part-time work increased. Women worked a shorter work week (mean, 47.9 vs. 49.7 h, P = 0.024), partly due to greater part-time work (20.2 vs. 13.1%, P value less than 0.001). Relative importance of factors reported among those leaving patient care differed by age cohort, subspecialty, and work status. Poor health was cited by 64% of anesthesiologists retiring in their 50s as compared with 43% of those retiring later (P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: This survey lends support for greater attention to potentially modifiable factors, such as workplace wellness and professional satisfaction, to prevent premature retirement. The growing trend in part-time work deserves further study.

Proxy healthcare decision-making for persons with intellectual disability: perspectives of residential-agency directors.

Directors of residential agencies for persons with intellectual disability in one U.S. state completed a self-administered, mailed survey to assess relative importance of information sources and decision factors in proxy healthcare decision-making. The most important sources were physician recommendations and input from the person; family input, care staff recommendations, and medical records were less valued. The person's wishes and best interests and recommendations of medical experts were the most important decision factors. Less important were benefits and risks of the intervention, family wishes, and health status; little emphasis was accorded to religious affiliation and extra cost to agency. More research is needed on how best to elicit the wishes and determine what constitutes the "best interests" of these vulnerable individuals.

A content analysis from a US statewide survey of memorable healthcare decisions for individuals with intellectual disability.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about surrogate healthcare decision-making for individuals with intellectual disability (ID). This study examined healthcare decision-making by residential-agency directors to learn their process and the extent to which the individual is included. METHOD: Content analysis of qualitative data from a mailed survey of residential-agency directors in a large US northeastern state. RESULTS: Narrative comments of 102 directors (65% of respondents) are reported. Three themes emerged: (a) Identifying someone else's "best interest" is challenging; (b) Perceptions of the healthcare community, especially related to quality of life, can influence care provided; and (c) Surrogate decision-making is a team effort. CONCLUSIONS: With knowledge of how decisions are made, the healthcare community can better interact with the complex array of service agencies and persons who determine care for this vulnerable population.

Prolonged retrograde amnesia following sedation with propofol in a 12-year-old boy.

Propofol is commonly used for sedation in a variety of clinical settings, as well as for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. The ease with which propofol can be administered and titrated to clinical effect, in addition to its accepted safety profile, has made it the drug of choice for sedation in outpatient procedures, such as gastrointestinal endoscopy. While short-term amnesia is a well-known side-effect of propofol, we present the first documented case of prolonged retrograde amnesia following propofol administration in a pediatric patient. Possible mechanisms and clinical management strategies related to this unique event are discussed.

The anesthesia preoperative assessment: an opportunity for smoking cessation intervention.

Smoking is the single most cause of preventable disease and premature death in the United States. We discuss potential hazards that the anesthesiologist should be aware of when caring for patients who abuse tobacco. A review of recent preoperative smoking cessation initiatives is also provided in addition to recommendations on how anesthesiologists may use the preoperative visit as an opportunity to play a more active role in reducing the burden of tobacco-related disease.

The Health Policy and Legislative Awareness Initiative at the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine: theory meets practice.

In a constantly evolving health care landscape shaped by many voices--including those of third party payers and government--physicians must learn to play a more proactive role to become better advocates for their patients and to uphold the basic tenets of their noble profession. As legislation and public health become increasingly intertwined with the practice of medicine, educators must provide future physicians with the tools to meet these new challenges. Accordingly, in 1996 Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine embarked on its Health Policy and Legislative Awareness Initiative, a medical school elective designed to provide theoretical knowledge as well as practical experience in legislative and policy issues for future physicians early in their careers. The Initiative has three key elements: a series of lectures taught by national and local experts covering a basic health policy curriculum, a mini-internship conducted at the office of a Pennsylvania State legislator, and a practical assignment leading to authorship of a resolution to a national medical organization or assisting in drafting a bill intended for introduction to the Pennsylvania State Legislature. Following several years of successful implementation and a moderate growth in enrollment, recent changes in the local and national scene have peaked the interest of most students to learn about the system in which they will practice medicine. Therefore, in addition to describing the Initiative in its current form, the authors discuss future plans for expanded elective opportunities and consider the issue of integrating health policy education into core medical school curricula.