Multicenter prospective micro-costing study evaluating mandibular free-flap reconstruction.

Free-flap mandibular reconstruction is a highly specialized procedure associated with severe complications necessitating re-interventions and re-hospitalizations. This surgery is expensive in terms of health workers' time, equipment, medical devices and drugs. Our main objective was to assess the direct hospital cost generated by osseocutaneous free-flap surgery in a multicentric prospective micro-costing study. Direct medical costs evaluated from a hospital perspective were assessed using a micro-costing method from the first consultation with the surgeon until the patient returns home, thus confirming the success or failure of the free-flap procedure. The mean total cost for free-flap intervention was 34,009€ (5151-119,604€), the most expensive item being the duration of hospital bed occupation, representing 30-90% of the total cost. In the event of complications, the mean cost increased by 77.3%, due primarily to hospitalization in ICU and the conventional unit. This surgery is effective and provides good results but remains highly complex and costly.

Dentalmaps: automatic dental delineation for radiotherapy planning in head-and-neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To propose an automatic atlas-based segmentation framework of the dental structures, called Dentalmaps, and to assess its accuracy and relevance to guide dental care in the context of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multi-atlas-based segmentation, less sensitive to artifacts than previously published head-and-neck segmentation methods, was used. The manual segmentations of a 21-patient database were first deformed onto the query using nonlinear registrations with the training images and then fused to estimate the consensus segmentation of the query. RESULTS: The framework was evaluated with a leave-one-out protocol. The maximum doses estimated using manual contours were considered as ground truth and compared with the maximum doses estimated using automatic contours. The dose estimation error was within 2-Gy accuracy in 75% of cases (with a median of 0.9 Gy), whereas it was within 2-Gy accuracy in 30% of cases only with the visual estimation method without any contour, which is the routine practice procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Dose estimates using this framework were more accurate than visual estimates without dental contour. Dentalmaps represents a useful documentation and communication tool between radiation oncologists and dentists in routine practice. Prospective multicenter assessment is underway on patients extrinsic to the database.