Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Headache ; 64(8): 1040-1048, 2024 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957119

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Identify how the American Headache Society (AHS) membership manages status migrainosus (SM) among outpatients. BACKGROUND: SM is defined as a debilitating migraine attack lasting more than 72 h. There is no standard of care for SM, including whether a 72-h duration is required before the attack can be treated as SM. METHODS: The Refractory Headache Special Interest Group from AHS developed a four-question survey distributed to AHS members enquiring (1) whether they treat severe refractory migraine attacks the same as SM regardless of duration, (2) what their first step in SM management is, (3) what the top three medications they use for SM are, and (4) whether they are United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties (UCNS) certified. The survey was conducted in January 2022. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Responses were received from 196 of 1859 (10.5%) AHS members; 64.3% were UCNS certified in headache management. Respondents treated 69.4% (136/196) of patients with a severe refractory migraine attack as SM before the 72-h period had elapsed. Most (76.0%, 149/196) chose "treat remotely using outpatient medications at home" as the first step, 11.2% (22/196) preferred procedures, 6.1% (12/196) favored an infusion center, 6.1% (12/196) sent patients to the emergency department (ED) or urgent care, and 0.5% (1/196) preferred direct hospital admission. The top five preferred medications were as follows: (1) corticosteroids (71.4%, 140/196), (2) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (50.1%, 99/196), (3) neuroleptics (46.9%, 92/196), (4) triptans (30.6%, 60/196), and (5) dihydroergotamine (DHE) (21.4%, 42/196). CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals with expertise in headache medicine typically treated severe migraine attacks early and did not wait 72 h to fulfill the diagnostic criteria for SM. Outpatient management with one or more medications for home use was preferred by most respondents; few opted for ED referrals. Finally, corticosteroids, NSAIDs, neuroleptics, triptans, and DHE were the top five preferred treatments for home SM management.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Trastornos Migrañosos , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/terapia , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Femenino , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sociedades Médicas
2.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 26(7): 493-504, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35587859

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to aid in decision-making when choosing safe and effective options for preventive migraine medications. RECENT FINDINGS: In Part 2, we have compiled clinically relevant safety considerations for commonly used migraine prophylactic treatments. Preventive treatment of episodic migraine includes nonspecific and migraine-specific drugs. While medications from several pharmacological classes-such as anticonvulsants, beta-blockers, and antidepressants-have an established efficacy in migraine prevention, they are associated with a number of side effects. The safety of migraine-specific treatments such as anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants are also discussed. This review highlights safety concerns of commonly used migraine prophylactic agents and offers suggestions on how to mitigate those risks.


Asunto(s)
Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina , Trastornos Migrañosos , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control
3.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 26(7): 481-492, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35536501

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to aid in choosing safe options when assessing potential risks of acute migraine treatments based on known mechanisms of action and anticipated safety concerns. RECENT FINDINGS: Part 1 highlights safety issues associated with commonly used medications to treat acute migraine attacks. Strategies to mitigate cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, evaluation of cardiovascular risks of triptan and ergot alkaloids, and precautions with use of antiemetics and the novel drugs gepants and ditans are discussed to help practitioners in clinical decision-making. When available, we included recommendations from professional societies and data from pharmacovigilance systems. While guidelines on efficacy are available, one must also consider the possible risks and adverse effects of a drug when creating treatment plans.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/inducido químicamente , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Triptaminas/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...