Determinants of non-diabetic kidney diseases in type 2 diabetic patients: Twenty years of single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic nephropathy is one of the most common complications associated with diabetes. However, non-diabetic kidney disease has been reported in patients with type 2 diabetes at varying incidence rates. The objective of our study is to investigate the occurrence, clinicopathological characteristics, and inflammatory markers linked to diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathy (NDN) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Additionally, we aimed to explore the possibility of identifying non-diabetic pathology using different biopsy indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 159 patients with type 2 DM who underwent renal biopsy at a tertiary care nephrology clinic between January 2000 and January 2022 were enrolled in the study. We collected comprehensive data, including patient demographics, co-morbidities, diabetes duration, renal biopsy indications and results, serological markers, renal function, diabetic retinopathy (DRP), full blood count, blood biochemistry, urinalysis, and inflammatory markers. Patients were categorized based on their biopsy indications, and their biopsy results were classified into three groups: isolated NDN, isolated diabetic nephropathy (DN), and mixed nephropathy with concurrent NDN. We evaluated the relationship between biopsy indications and accompanying pathologies and statistically assessed the likelihood of each biopsy indication detecting non-diabetic renal pathology. Additionally, differences in other data, including demographic and laboratory results and medical histories, among the three groups were investigated. RESULTS: The most frequent indication of renal biopsy was atypical presentations of nephrotic syndrome or nephrotic range proteinuria (ANS/ANP) in 25.1% of patients. Other indications included unexplained renal failure (URF) in 22.6%, atypical presentations of non-nephrotic range proteinuria (ANNP) in 18.2%, acute kidney injury or rapidly progressive kidney dysfunction (AKI/RPKD) in 16.9%, microscopic hematuria in 15.7%, URF with ANNP in 11.3%, and severe nephrotic range proteinuria (SNP) in 9.4%. Renal biopsy revealed isolated NDN in 64.8%, DN in 25.1%, and mixed nephropathy in 10.1% of patients. Primary glomerular diseases were the main non-diabetic renal pathology, predominantly focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) (36.4%) followed by MN (10.6%) and IgA nephropathy (7.5%). In comparison with the isolated DN and mixed nephropathy groups, patients in the isolated NDN group had significantly shorter diabetes duration, fewer DRP, as well as lower serum creatinine and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that presence of hematuria (OR 4.40; 95% CI 1.34 - 14.46, p = 0.014), acute nephrotic range proteinuria (OR 11.93; 95% CI 1.56 - 90.77, p = 0.017), and AKI/APKD (OR 41.08; 95% CI 3.40 - 495.39, p = 0.003) were strong predictors of NDN. Lower NLR (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60 - 0.98, p = 0.035), shorter duration of diabetes (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.84 - 0.97, p = 0.010), and absence of DRP (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.12 - 0.98, p = 0.046) were also found to be independent indicators of NDN. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis revealed a cut-off value of ≤ 3.01 for NLR (sensitivity of 63.1%, specificity of 63.5%) with regards to predicting non-diabetic renal pathology (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Renal biopsy findings in patients with type 2 DM highlight that the prevalence of NDN may be higher than assumed, as presented mainly in the form of primary glomerular disease. The presence of AKI/RPKD, hematuria, and ANS/ANP serves as a reliable indicator of non-diabetic renal pathology. In more ambiguous situations, factors such as a shorter duration of diabetes, absence of DRP, and a lower NLR value may assist clinicians in biopsy decision.

Frequency of depressive symptoms in Syrian refugees and Turkish maintenance hemodialysis patients during COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Pneumonia of unknown cause was detected on 30 December 2019 in China. It was categorized as an outbreak and named as COVID-19 by the World Health Organization. The pandemic affects all people, but patient groups such as hemodialysis (HD) patients have been particularly affected. We do not know if refugees suffered more during the outbreak. In this study, we compared depressive symptom frequency between Syrian refugee HD patients and Turkish ones. METHODS: The study had a single-center, cross-sectional design. Demographic and clinical data were collected retrospectively from patients' files containing details about past medical history, demographic variables and laboratory values. Validated Turkish and Arabic forms of Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were used to assess depressive symptoms. BDI scores were compared according to nationality, demographic features and clinical data. A BDI score more than 14 was accepted as suspicion of depression. RESULTS: 119 patients were enrolled in the study. After the exclusion of 22 patients, 75 Turkish and 22 Syrian patients were included for further analysis. The median BDI (interquartile range) score for Turkish and Syrian patients were 12 (7-23) and 19.5 (12.7-25.2), respectively (p = 0.03). Suspicion of depression was present at 42.7% of Turkish, and 72.7% of Syrian HD patients (p = 0.013). Regarding all patients, phosphorus level, Kt/V, and nationality were significantly different between patients with and without suspicion of depression (p = 0.023, 0.039, 0.013, respectively). CONCLUSION: Syrian patients had higher BDI scores and more depressive symptoms than Turkish patients. Additional national measures for better integration and more mental support to Syrian HD patients are needed.