Pyrocarbon versus cobalt-chromium in the context of spherical interposition implants: an in vitro study on cultured chondrocytes.

In the context of shoulder surgical replacement, a new generation of spherical interposition implants has been developed, with the implant being a mobile spacer rubbing against the glenoid cartilage and humeral bone cavity. The aim of the present study was to compare pyrocarbon (PyC) versus cobalt-chromium (CoCr) implants, regarding preservation and regeneration of the surrounding tissues. The effect of the biomaterials on chondrocytes was analysed in vitro. Murine primary chondrocytes were grown on discs made of PyC or CoCr using two culture media to mimic either cartilage-like or bone-like conditions (CLC or BLC). Chondrocytes did grow on PyC and CoCr without alteration in cell viability or manifestation of cytotoxicity. The tissue-like cell membranes grown under BLC were examined for the chondrocyte's ability to mineralise (by alizarin red matrix staining, calcium deposit and alkaline phosphatase activity) and for their mechanical properties (by rheological tests). For the chondrocytes grown under CLC and BLC, extracellular matrix components were analysed by histological staining and immunolabelling. Under CLC, PyC promoted type II collagen expression in chondrocytes, suggesting that they may generate a more cartilage-like matrix than samples grown on both CoCr and plastic control. In BLC, the tissue-like cell membranes grown on PyC were more mineralised and homogenous. The mechanical results corroborated the biological data, since the elastic modulus of the tissue-like cell membranes developed on the PyC surface was higher, indicating more stiffness. Overall, the results suggested that PyC might be a suitable biomaterial for spherical interposition implants.

A numerical model to reproduce squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Influence of design and material.

BACKGROUND: Modern ceramic (CoC) bearings for hip arthroplasty (THA) have been used in younger patients who expect improved survivorship. However, audible squeaking produced by the implant is an annoying complication. Previous numerical simulations were not able to accurately reproduce in vitro and in vivo observations. Therefore, we developed a finite element model to: (1) reproduce in vitro squeaking and validate the model by comparing it with in vivo recordings, (2) determine why there are differences between in vivo and in vitro squeaking frequencies, (3) identify the stem's role in this squeaking, (4) predict which designs and materials are more likely to produce squeaking. HYPOTHESIS: A CoC THA numerical model can be developed that reproduces the squeaking frequencies observed in vivo. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Numerical methods (finite element analysis [ANSYS]) and experimental methods (using a non-lubricated simulated hip with a cementless 32mm CoC THA) were developed to reproduce squeaking. Numerical analysis was performed to identify the frequencies that cause vibrations perceived as an acoustic emission. The finite element analysis (FEA) model was enhanced by adjusting periprosthetic bone and soft tissue elements in order to reproduce the squeaking frequencies recorded in vivo. A numerical method (complex eigenvalue analysis) was used to find the acoustic frequencies of the squeaking noise. The frequencies obtained from the model and the hip simulator were compared to those recorded in vivo. RESULTS: The numerical results were validated by experiments with the laboratory hip simulator. The frequencies obtained (mean 2790Hz with FEA, 2755Hz with simulator, decreasing to 1759Hz when bone and soft tissue were included in the FEA) were consistent with those of squeaking hips recorded in vivo (1521Hz). The cup and ceramic insert were the source of the vibration, but had little influence on the diffusion of the noise required to make the squeaking audible to the human ear. The FEA showed that diffusion of squeaking was due to an unstable vibration of the stem during frictional contact. The FEA predicted a higher rate of squeaking (at a lower coefficient of friction) when TZMF™ alloy is used instead of Ti6Al4V and when an anatomic press-fit stem is used instead of straight self-locking designs. DISCUSSION: The current FEA model is reliable; it can be used to assess various stem designs and alloys to predict the different rates of squeaking that certain stems will likely produce. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV in vitro study.