RESUMEN
The objective of this study was to investigate the levels of gene expression in the middle ear mucosa of 2 patients diagnosed with eosinophilic otitis media. One patient with severe hearing loss showed high expression levels of genes encoding IL-5 and IL-33 receptors.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implantation (CI) for the treatment of single-sided deafness (SSD) is a relatively new treatment modality. Although comparing the effectiveness of CI and contralateral routing of signal (CROS) hearing aids (HAs) is important, very few reports on this topic exist. In this study, objective assessments and subjective assessments were conducted to determine which SSD individuals would prefer CI or CROS HAs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Objective assessments (speech perception and sound localization) and subjective assessments (Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHIA), Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), MOS Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2)) were performed on 87 SSD patients. Of the 87 SSD patients, 33 patients hoped for CROS HAs, and 17 patients hoped for CI. The CI group underwent subjective and objective assessments at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The CROS HAs group underwent objective assessments at 1 month after wearing CROS HAs. RESULTS: After the intervention, the localization ability was significantly improved in the CI group (p < 0.05) with no significant improvement in that of the CROS HAs group (p = 0.48). No significant improvement in speech perception in noise was observed in the CROS (Signal-to-Noise ratio + 10, p = 0.08; SN + 0, p = 0.17); however, a significant improvement in the CI group was observed at 12 months postoperatively. The APHAB subscale "background noise" and SF-36v2 health concepts of role-physical, general health, vitality, role-emotional, and mental health were significantly higher in the CI group. CONCLUSION: CI was superior to CROS HAs in speech perception in terms of noise and sound localization. Patients with postlingual acute-onset hearing loss and more handicaps and a more positive view of their hearing loss possibly tend to choose CI.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Sordera , Audífonos , Pérdida Auditiva Unilateral , Pérdida Auditiva , Localización de Sonidos , Percepción del Habla , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sordera/cirugía , Sordera/rehabilitación , Pérdida Auditiva Unilateral/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have suggested that speech perception outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) in prelingually deafened adults have improved with advances in CI technology and speech processing strategies. However, the outcomes vary from case to case. Communication mode has been reported in many studies as the factor that related to the post CI outcomes. This study aimed at investigating the post CI outcomes and the progress during 2 years for each communication mode. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The subjects were 17 prelingually deafened adults undergoing CI at our hospital between April 2013 and March 2019. We investigated preoperative factors affecting post CI outcomes. Also we analyzed post CI outcomes for each communication mode and compared preoperative factors for each communication mode. RESULTS: Communication mode and preoperative discrimination score were the factor affecting on postoperative discrimination score. The speech perception score after CI improved significantly in the oral and lip-reading group and total communication group. The speech perception scores in postlingually deafened adults improved significantly during the first six months and became to plateau after CI. On the other hand, the scores of prelingually deafened adults tended to improve gradually after six months postoperatively. Furthermore, the degree of improvement and progress differed by each communication mode. CONCLUSION: The communication mode is important factors in predicting outcomes in prelingually deafened adults after CI. Long-term auditory training is important for prelingually deafened adults who use visual information as their preoperative method of communication.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Sordera , Percepción del Habla , Adulto , Humanos , Sordera/cirugía , Sordera/rehabilitación , HablaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Eosinophilic otitis media (EOM) is an intractable middle ear disease recognized by an eosinophil enriched middle ear effusion and mucosa. Although precise pathogenesis of EOM remains unclear, it is characterized by type 2 inflammation. Since IgG4 is an IgG subclass induced by type 2 cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-13, we sought to characterize and compare local IgG4 expression in patients with and without EOM. METHODS: Twelve patients with bilateral profound hearing loss, 9 of which underwent a cochlear implant surgery, were enrolled in this study (6 with EOM and 6 without EOM). The surgical specimens were harvested during surgery and were subjected to IgG4 immunostaining. RESULT: The middle ear mucosa showed the presence of a large number of IgG4-positive cells in patients with EOM, which was significantly higher than that in patients without EOM. CONCLUSION: Local IgG4 expression was observed in patients with EOM in comparison to those without EOM, suggesting that IgG4 contributes to EOM pathogenesis.
Asunto(s)
Otitis Media con Derrame , Otitis Media , Oído Medio , Eosinófilos , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G , InflamaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Detailed studies have not been conducted on sound localization and speech perception in noise in patients with unilateral congenital aural atresia (UCAA). AIMS/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits of the use of the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) for UCAA by performing audiometric and sound localization tests. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four children with UCAA underwent VSB (VORP 503) implantation from 2018 to 2019. Speech perception tests in noise were conducted using the Japanese monosyllable test. The spatial configuration for speech testing consisted of speech presented from the front and noise presented into the normal ear (S0N90). The sound localization test was conducted using nine loudspeakers equally distributed in a semicircle. RESULTS: The children's speech perception in noise 6 months after VSB activation was significantly better than before activation (p < .05). Additionally, the children's sound localization ability after VSB activation was significantly better than before VSB activation. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: The benefits of VSB use in children with UCAA were revealed using audiometric and sound localization tests.