Risk Factors for Invasive Interventions in Hospitalized Children With Suppurative Cervical Lymphadenitis.

Suppurative cervical lymphadenitis sometimes resolves with oral antibiotic treatment; however, many children are hospitalized for intravenous treatment due to lack of improvement. When there is no substantial improvement, the possibility of a liquefaction process is considered, and as a result, source control such as needle aspiration or open surgical drainage is recommended. We examined, among pediatric patients hospitalized with suppurative cervical lymphadenitis, clinical and laboratory predictors for invasive intervention that may lead to early imaging and intervention, hasten recovery, and shorten length of hospitalization. We compared laboratory and clinical characteristics of pediatric patients hospitalized with suppurative cervical lymphadenitis during 2010-2017, according to 3 treatments: needle aspiration (N = 54), open surgical drainage (N = 37), and conservative adequate antibiotic treatment only (N = 292). Physical indicators such as local erythema and fluctuation were found as predictors for invasive interventions in hospitalized pediatric patients diagnosed with suppurative cervical lymphadenitis. No significant associations were found between invasive interventions and laboratory parameters assessed in this study. Children who underwent interventions displayed a prolonged average length of hospitalization and received extended antibiotic treatment prior to hospital admission. In hospitalized pediatric patients diagnosed with suppurative cervical lymphadenitis, physical examination findings are the main predictive factors for invasive interventions. Consequently, when such straightforward clinical findings are observed in the context of insufficient improvement during antibiotic treatment, they should prompt consideration of invasive intervention.

The association of neonatal SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike protein receptor-binding domain antibodies at delivery with infant SARS-CoV-2 infection under the age of 6 months: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the association between neonatal SARS-CoV-2 antibody level at delivery and infant SARS-CoV-2 infection under the age of 6 months and to identify predictive factors for neonatal antibody level at delivery. METHODS: In a prospective observational study, conducted between September 2021 and mid-February 2022, cord blood sera were tested for SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike receptor-binding domain antibodies after maternal BNT162b2 vaccination or infection. Infants were followed up for 6 months for SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: Sixty-seven mother-infant dyads were enrolled; nine of those did not meet the eligibility criteria. Of the 58 mother-infant dyads included, 6-month follow-up data were available for 57 mother-infant dyads. The mean ± standard deviation log SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody level at delivery was lower among infants who were COVID-19 positive versus negative during follow-up (3.41 ± 0.74 AU/mL, n = 12; vs. 3.87 ± 0.84 AU/mL, n = 46; p 0.036); a log titre of ≥4.07 AU/mL (11 750) at delivery was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of infant infection (1/26 vs. 11/32 in infants with antibody level of <4.07 log AU/mL, OR = 0.076 [95% CI, 0.076, 0.64], p 0.018). A spline curve model showed a linear decrease in antibody levels when the last dose was administered at ≤30 weeks of gestation (50 days before delivery), after which the antibody levels increased (R2 = 0.50). In multivariate analysis, more vaccine doses, prior maternal infection, and last administered dose at ≥31 weeks of gestation were associated with higher antibody levels at delivery. DISCUSSION: Higher anti-spike antibodies at delivery were associated with decreased risk of COVID-19 at the age of <6 months; the antibody level decreased linearly when the last dose was administered at ≤30 weeks of gestation. Future research should assess the effectiveness of a second booster during pregnancy against infant infection.

COVID-19 infection in pediatric patients treated for cancer.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19, the novel coronavirus, has caused a global pandemic affecting millions of people around the world. Risk factors for critical disease in adults are advanced age and underlying medical comorbidities, including cancer. Data are sparse on the effect of COVID-19 infection on pediatric patients with cancer during their active antineoplastic therapy. The optimal management of antineoplastic treatment during COVID-19 infection in this unique population is controversial. AIM: To describe the severity and clinical course of COVID-19 infection in pediatric patients with cancer during active antineoplastic treatment and to study their course of treatment. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory data were collected from medical files of patients diagnosed with COVID-19, confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), who received active antineoplastic treatment between March 2020 and May 2021 in a large tertiary pediatric medical center. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with diverse pediatric cancers are described. They were infected with COVID-19 at different stages of their antineoplastic treatment regimen. Eight had an asymptomatic COVID-19 infection, nine had mild symptoms, and one had severe disease. All of them recovered from COVID-19 infection. Two patients experienced delays in their antineoplastic treatment; none of the other patients had delays or interruptions, including patients who were symptomatic for COVID-19. CONCLUSION: In pediatric patients with cancer who test positive for COVID-19, yet are asymptomatic or have mild symptoms, the continuance of antineoplastic therapy may be considered.

Hospitalization for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Bronchiolitis in the Palivizumab Prophylaxis Era: Need for Reconsideration of Preventive Timing and Eligibility.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-related bronchiolitis is a common cause of morbidity in young infants. The recommendations for its passive prevention by palivizumab are currently under intensive debate. OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the optimal prevention strategy by studying the morbidity of RSV disease under the current recommendations for palivizumab prophylaxis in Israel. METHODS: We collected demographic and clinical data of all children hospitalized with microbiologically confirmed RSV bronchiolitis during 2015-2016 at Schneider Children's Medical Center. The seasonality of RSV disease was also studied for the period 2010-2017 in sentinel clinics scattered throughout Israel. RESULTS: Of the 426 hospitalized children, 106 (25%) had underlying diseases but were not eligible for palivizumab prophylaxis according to the current criteria in Israel. Their course was severe, with a mean hospital stay of 6.7 days and a 12% admission rate to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Palivizumab-eligible children who did not receive the prophylaxis before hospitalization had the most severe course, with 22% admitted to the PICU. More children were diagnosed with RSV disease in October than in March among both hospitalized and ambulatory children; 44% of the palivizumab-eligible hospitalized children were admitted in the last 2 weeks of October, before 1 November which is the recommended date for starting palivizumab administration in Israel. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of the present study we suggest advancing RSV prophylaxis in Israel from 1 November to mid-October. The precise palivizumab-eligible categories should be reconsidered.