New Oxidative Stress Markers Useful in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Children: Thiol/Disulfide Homeostasis and the Asymmetric Dimethylarginine Level.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate 2 new oxidative stress markers, thiol/disulfide homeostasis status and the asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) level, in children with acute appendicitis (AA) and to evaluate their diagnostic utility. METHODS: This case-control study included 45 patients with AA and 35 healthy children. Age, sex, white blood cell count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) level, ultrasonographic findings, thiol/disulfide homeostasis parameters (native and total thiol levels, native thiol/total thiol ratios [antioxidant parameters], and disulfide, disulfide/native thiol, and disulfide/total thiol ratios [oxidant parameters]), and the ADMA level were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The native and total thiol levels, and the native thiol/total thiol ratio, were significantly lower, and the disulfide level and disulfide/native thiol and disulfide/total thiol ratios significantly higher, in the AA compared with the control group (all P < 0.001). The ADMA level was significantly higher in a perforated versus nonperforated subgroup of AA patients, but the thiol/disulfide homeostasis parameters did not differ significantly between the two subgroups. In addition, the hs-CRP level and appendiceal wall thickness were higher in the perforated subgroup. The thiol/disulfide antioxidant parameters and ADMA level correlated negatively with the white blood cell count, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and the hs-CRP level, in the AA group, but correlated positively with oxidant parameters. The sensitivity and specificity of the disulfide/native thiol and disulfide/total thiol ratios were high when used to diagnose AA, whereas the sensitivity of the ADMA level was high when used to diagnose perforated appendicitis. CONCLUSIONS: Thiol/disulfide homeostasis and the ADMA level, together with certain other parameters, may be useful biomarkers of AA in children.

Thiol disulphide homeostasis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

OBJECTIVE: To investigate novel oxidative stress marker thiol disulphide homeostasis in patients with acute myocardial infarction.. METHODS: The case-control study was conducted at Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey, between October 26, 2015 and January 26, 2016. It comprised patients of ST elevation myocardial infarction, and healthy individuals. Troponin levels, native thiol, total thiol, and disulphide were compared among the groups. Results: Of the 128 subjects, 98(76.5%) were patients and 30(23.43%) were controls. Disulphide levels were lower in the patients compared to the controls (p<0.001).As troponin levels increased, native thiol, total thiol and disulphide levels in patients decreased (p<0.05). RESULTS: Of the 128 subjects, 98(76.5%) were patients and 30(23.43%) were controls. Disulphide levels were lower in the patients compared to the controls (p<0.001).As troponin levels increased, native thiol, total thiol and disulphide levels in patients decreased (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Native thiol and total thiol levels may be used as a novel oxidative stres marker in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Evaluation of thiol-disulphide homeostasis in radiation workers.

PURPOSE: To evaluate thiol-disulphide homeostasis - a novel, easily calculated, readily available, and relatively cheap oxidative stress marker - in radiation workers and compare the results with healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 108 participants were enrolled in the study including 63 hospital workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation in the units of interventional radiology, interventional cardiology and nuclear medicine. A control group consisted of 45 individuals staff in the same hospital. Serum thiol-disulphide homeostasis measurement was investigated via the spectrophotometric method newly described by Erel and Neselioglu. RESULTS: The mean serum native thiol levels of radiation workers (528.96 ± 86.42 µmol/l) was significantly lower than control subjects (561.05 ± 104.83 µmol/l) (p = .045). The mean serum total thiol levels of radiation workers (547.70 ± 91.50 µmol/l) was lower than control subjects (580.36 ± 112.24 µmol/l). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference between total thiol of exposed workers and controls. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that long-term low dose ionizing radiation may lead to oxidative stress and have side-effects in antioxidant thiol groups. We may suggest supporting radiation workers by safe antioxidant nutritional formulations and following up via both physical dosimetry and biodosimetric methods.