Comparison of lung ultrasound and other volumetric methods in peritoneal dialysis patients.

ABSTRACT: Although many alternative methods are present, maintaining ideal volume status in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients still rely on clinical evaluation due to lack of an evidence-based method. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a new method for evaluation of hidden congestion in this group.LUS findings and its relationship with other volumetric methods are investigated in this observational cross-sectional study.In this observational cross sectional study, LUS was performed to all PD patients and compared with symptoms of hypervolemia, physical examination, vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, chest radiography, echocardiography, bioelectrical impedance analysis.Data of 21 PD patients were evaluated. There was correlation between number of B lines and VEGF-C levels (r = 0.447, P = .042), daily urine output (r = 0.582, P = .007) and left ventricle mass index (r = -0.456, P = .038). Correlations with all other parameters were not significant. Daily urine output and VEGF-C levels were significantly different when B lines were grouped into 2 according to the median level (P < .05 for all).This is the widest spectrum study looking for LUS findings and other volumetric parameters in a small PD cohort. LUS might be useful to evaluate hidden hypervolemia. Its correlation with VEGF-C level is a novel finding.

Comparison of Circulating Levels of Uremic Toxins in Hemodialysis Patients Treated with Medium Cut-Off Membranes and High-Flux Membranes: Theranova in Sisli Hamidiye Etfal (THE SHE) Randomized Control Study.

INTRODUCTION: Removal of uremic toxins is a main objective of hemodialysis; however, whether high-flux and medium cut-off (MCO) membranes differ as regards removal of middle and large uremic toxins is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To compare medium cut-off and high-flux dialyzers as regards their intra- and interdialysis effect on circulating levels of middle and large uremic toxins and serum albumin. METHODS: Fifty-two patients were randomized to have hemodialysis with either 3 months of high-flux dialyzer followed by 3 months of MCO or vice versa. Blood samples were taken before and after dialysis at the first and last sessions of each dialyzer for analyses of middle and large uremic toxins including inflammatory mediators and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and serum albumin. RESULTS: Reduction rates were higher, and postdialysis levels of ß-2 microglobulin, free kappa and lambda light chains, and myoglobulin were lower at the first and last sessions with MCO dialyzers compared to high-flux dialyzers (p < 0.05 for all). Last session predialysis levels of ß-2 microglobulin, free kappa light chain, and free lambda light chain were lower than first session predialysis levels in MCO dialyzers as compared to high-flux dialyzers (p < 0.05 for all). Last session levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-10, interleukin-17, and interferon-gamma did not differ between dialyzers (p > 0.05 for all). VEGF level was lower in the MCO group compared to the high-flux group (p = 0.043). Last session level of serum albumin with MCO dialyzers was lower than that with high-flux dialyzers (3.62 [3.45-3.88] vs. 3.78 [3.58-4.02] g/L) (p = 0.04) and 6.7% lower (p < 0.001) than at the first session of MCO dialyzers. CONCLUSION: The decline in circulating levels of several middle and large uremic toxins including VEGF following hemodialysis was more pronounced when using MCO membranes as compared to high-flux membranes while their effect on inflammatory molecules was similar.