Improved Efficacy of Delayed Treatment with Human Bone Marrow-Derived Stromal Cells Evaluated in Rats with Spinal Cord Injury.

The treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI) with uncultivated human bone marrow-derived stromal cells (bmSCs) prepared by negative selection has been proposed to be therapeutically superior to treatment with stem cells that were expanded in vitro. To explore their use in clinical trials, we studied the functional effects of delayed application at 7 days after SCI by testing different doses of bmSCs. Spinal cord contusion injury was induced in adult male Wistar rats at the thoracic level T9. Human bmSCs were prepared by negative selection without expansion in vitro (NeuroCellsTM). Treatment consisted of one 150 µL injection into the cisterna magna containing 0.5 or 2.5 million fresh bmSCs or 2.5 million bmSCs. The recovery of motor functions was evaluated during a surveillance period of six weeks (6 W), during which spinal cords were assessed histologically. Treatment resulted in a significant, dose-dependent therapeutic effect on the recovery of motor performance. The histological analysis revealed a lower degree of axonal degeneration and better survival of neurons and oligodendrocytes in bmSCs treated rats. Our results support delayed intrathecal application of bmSCs prepared by negative selection without expansion in vitro as a treatment of SCI.

A comparison of elbow and wrist kinematics and kinetics during swing-through versus reciprocal gait with crutches in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study with cross-sectional data collection. OBJECTIVES: To analyse and compare the 3D kinematics and kinetics of thorax, elbow and wrist, and the spatio-temporal parameters during swing-through gait (SG) and reciprocal gait (RG). SETTING: Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos in Toledo, Spain. METHODS: An instrumented biomechanical analysis of the upper body of 15 adults with an incomplete lumbar or thoracic spinal cord injury was performed using a marker motion capture system and load cell crutches. Five walks of each gait pattern were analysed. RESULTS: The elbow was in flexion, valgus and pronation and the wrist was in extension and ulnar deviation in both SG and RG. Their kinematic patterns were quite similar, except in elbow valgus and wrist extension in which statistically significant differences were observed. In the thorax prevailed flexion movement in SG and rotation movement in RG. The reaction forces in the elbow and the wrist were notably higher in SG than in RG, but the joint moments were similar in both gait patterns. CONCLUSIONS: SG showed greater demands and RG showed higher requirements on trunk motor control. In addition, SG could increase the probability of back and neck pain. Therefore RG should be recommended, whenever possible, in incomplete spinal cord injured people. Rehabilitative management should consider adapting properly the crutch height and the inclination cane, loading the minimum weight on the crutches, using cushioning devices, reducing the duration of support phase, and limiting the overall use time of the crutches.

Point-Mass Biomechanical Model of the Upper Extremity During Lofstrand Crutch-Assisted Gait.

We propose a point-mass biomechanical model to estimate the forces and moments supported by the upper extremity during Lofstrand crutch-assisted gait. This model is based on the Newtonian classical mechanics and the angular momentum theorem. The system arm-crutch is divided into three segments: 1) crutch, 2) wrist-elbow, and 3) elbow-shoulder. The theoretical model was experimentally validated with a disabled person with spinal cord injury. Two crutch-assisted gait patterns have been chosen to carry out the experimental validation: two-point reciprocal gait and swing-through gait. Six position markers (three placed on the arm and three placed on the crutch) and two force sensors (placed on the crutch) were used in experiments for testing the model. The results were compared with a distributed-mass model based on studies previously published, concluding that the relative mean difference between models is less than 3% Body Weight and 1% Body Weight times Height when forces and moments are estimated, respectively. Some advantages of using a point-mass model are summarized: simple formulation, easy to understand; require less numerical calculation reducing the computational cost; requires less position markers placed on the subject, increasing therefore the comfort of the subject.

Application of a model to analyze shoulder biomechanics in adult patients with spinal cord injury when walking with crutches in two different gait patterns.

BACKGROUND: Specific biomechanical models have been developed to study gait using crutches. Clinical application of these models is needed in adult spinal cord injury (SCI) population walking with different patterns of gait with crutches to prevent overuse shoulder injuries. OBJECTIVE: To apply a biomechanical model in a clinical environment to analyze shoulder in adult SCI patients walking with two different patterns of gait with crutches: two point reciprocal gait (RG) and swing-through gait (SG). METHODS: Load cells were fixed to the distal ends and forearm cuffs of a pair of crutches. An active markers system was used for kinematics. Five cycles for each gait pattern were analyzed applying a biomechanical model of the upper limbs. Fifteen subjects with SCI were analyzed. RESULTS: The flexo-extension range of motion was significantly greater when using SG (p < 0.01). Similarly, the superior, posterior and medial forces were significantly stronger for SG in all 3 directions. Flexion, adduction and internal rotation torques were also greater in SG (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A biomechanical model was successfully applied to study shoulder biomechanics in adult patients with SCI walking with crutches in two different gait patterns. Greater loads exerted on the shoulder walking with SG were confirmed compared to RG.

Echographic and kinetic changes in the shoulder joint after manual wheelchair propulsion under two different workload settings.

Manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI) have a high prevalence of shoulder pain due to the use of the upper extremity for independent mobility, transfers, and other activities of daily living. Indeed, shoulder pain dramatically affects quality of life of these individuals. There is limited evidence obtained through radiographic techniques of a relationship between the forces acting on the shoulder during different propulsion conditions and shoulder pathologies. Today, ultrasound is widely accepted as a precise tool in diagnosis, displaying particularly effectiveness in screening the shoulder rotator cuff. Thus, we set out to perform an ultrasound-based study of the acute changes to the shoulder soft tissues after propelling a manual wheelchair in two workload settings. Shoulder joint kinetics was recorded from 14 manual wheelchair users with SCI while they performed high- and low-intensity wheelchair propulsion tests (constant and incremental). Shoulder joint forces and moments were obtained from inverse dynamic methods, and ultrasound screening of the shoulder was performed before and immediately after the test. Kinetic changes were more relevant after the most intensive task, showing the significance of high-intensity activity, yet no differences were found in ultrasound-related parameters before and after each propulsion task. It therefore appears that further studies will be needed to collect clinical data and correlate data regarding shoulder pain with both ultrasound images and data from shoulder kinetics.

Comparative biomechanical analysis of gait in patients with central cord and Brown-Séquard syndrome.

PURPOSE: This is a pilot study with the aim to highlight the use of kinematic and kinetic analyses as an adjunct to the assessment of individual patients with central cord syndrome (CCS) and hemisection or Brown-Séquard syndrome (BSS) and to discuss their possible consequences for clinical management. METHODS: The sample studied consisted of 17 patients with CCS, 13 with BSS and 20 control subjects (control group (CG)). Data were obtained using a three-dimensional motion analysis system and two force plates. Gait differences were compared between CCS, BSS walking at a self-selected speed and CG at both a self-selected and a similar speed to that of the patient groups. RESULTS: The most relevant findings involved the knee and ankle, especially in the sagittal plane. In patients with CCS, knee flexion at initial contact was increased with respect to those in the BSS group (p < 0.01). The ankle in the BSS group made initial contact with a small degree of plantar flexion. CONCLUSION: The use of gait biomechanical analysis to detect underlying impairments can help the physician to set a specific rehabilitation program in each CCS and BSS walking patient. In this group of patients, rehabilitation treatment should aim to improve gait control and optimise ankle positioning at initial contact. Implications for Rehabilitation In this study, gait differences between patients with CSS and BSS were evaluated with biomechanical equipment. The most remarkable differences were found in the knee and ankle sagittal plane due to ankle position at initial contact. In this group of patients, rehabilitation treatment should aim to improve gait control and to get a better ankle positioning at initial contact.

Gait kinematic analysis in patients with a mild form of central cord syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Central cord syndrome (CCS) is considered the most common incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). Independent ambulation was achieved in 87-97% in young patients with CCS but no gait analysis studies have been reported before in such pathology. The aim of this study was to analyze the gait characteristics of subjects with CCS and to compare the findings with a healthy age, sex and anthropomorphically matched control group (CG), walking both at a self-selected speed and at the same speed. METHODS: Twelve CCS patients and a CG of twenty subjects were analyzed. Kinematic data were obtained using a three-dimensional motion analysis system with two scanner units. The CG were asked to walk at two different speeds, at a self-selected speed and at a slower one, similar to the mean gait speed previously registered in the CCS patient group. Temporal, spatial variables and kinematic variables (maximum and minimum lower limb joint angles throughout the gait cycle in each plane, along with the gait cycle instants of occurrence and the joint range of motion - ROM) were compared between the two groups walking at similar speeds. RESULTS: The kinematic parameters were compared when both groups walked at a similar speed, given that there was a significant difference in the self-selected speeds (p < 0.05). Hip abduction and knee flexion at initial contact, as well as minimal knee flexion at stance, were larger in the CCS group (p < 0.05). However, the range of knee and ankle motion in the sagittal plane was greater in the CG group (p < 0.05). The maximal ankle plantar-flexion values in stance phase and at toe off were larger in the CG (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The gait pattern of CCS patients showed a decrease of knee and ankle sagittal ROM during level walking and an increase in hip abduction to increase base of support. The findings of this study help to improve the understanding how CCS affects gait changes in the lower limbs.

Kinematic analysis of the daily activity of drinking from a glass in a population with cervical spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional kinematic analysis equipment is a valuable instrument for studying the execution of movement during functional activities of the upper limbs. The aim of this study was to analyze the kinematic differences in the execution of a daily activity such as drinking from a glass between two groups of patients with tetraplegia and a control group. METHODS: A total of 24 people were separated into three groups for analysis: 8 subjects with metameric level C6 tetraplegia, 8 subjects with metameric level C7 tetraplegia and 8 control subjects (CG). A set of active markers that emit infrared light were positioned on the upper limb. Two scanning units were used to record the sessions. The activity of drinking from a glass was broken down into a series of clearly identifiable phases to facilitate analysis. Movement times, velocities, and the joint angles of the shoulder, elbow and wrist in the three spatial planes were the variables analyzed. RESULTS: The most relevant differences between the three groups were in the wrist. Wrist palmar flexion during the back transport phase was greater in the patients with C6 and C7 tetraplegia than in the CG, whereas the highest wrist dorsal flexion values were in forward transport in the subjects with C6 or C7 tetraplegia, who required complete activation of the tenodesis effect to complete grasping. CONCLUSIONS: A detailed description was made of the three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the task of drinking from a glass in healthy subjects and in two groups of patients with tetraplegia. This was a useful application of kinematic analysis of upper limb movement in a clinical setting. Better knowledge of the execution of this movement in each of these groups allows therapeutic recommendations to be specifically adapted to the functional deficit present. This information can be useful in designing wearable robots to compensate the performance of AVD, such as drinking, in people with cervical SCI.

Upper limb joint kinetics during manual wheelchair propulsion in patients with different levels of spinal cord injury.

The purpose of this study was to compare the forces and moments of the whole upper limb, analyzing forces and moments at the shoulder, elbow and wrist joints simultaneously during manual wheelchair propulsion of persons with different levels of spinal cord injury (SCI) on a treadmill. Fifty-one people participated in this study and were grouped by their level of SCI: C6 tetraplegia (G1), C7 tetraplegia (G2), high paraplegia (G3), and low paraplegia (G4). An inverse dynamic model was defined to compute net joint forces and moments from segment kinematics, the forces acting on the pushrim, and subject anthropometrics. Right side, upper limb kinematic data were collected with four camcorders (Kinescan-IBV). Kinetic data were recorded by replacing the wheels with SmartWheels (Three Rivers Holdings, LLC). All participants propelled the wheelchair at 3km/h for 1min. The most noteworthy findings in both our tetraplegic groups in relation to paraplegic groups were increased superior joint forces in the shoulder (G1 and G2 vs G3 p<0.001; G1 and G2 vs G4 p<0.01), elbow (G1 vs G3 p<0.001; G1 vs G4 p<0.05) and wrist (G1 vs G4 p<0.001), an increased adduction moment in the shoulder (G1 vs G3 p<0.001; G1 vs G4 p<0.01; G2 vs G3 and G4 p<0.05) and the constancy of the moments of force of the wrist the fact that they reached their lowest values in the tetraplegic groups. This pattern may increase the risk of developing upper limb overuse injuries in tetraplegic subjects.