Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Colorectal Dis ; 26(4): 692-701, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38353528

RESUMEN

AIM: Financial toxicity describes the financial burden and distress that patients experience due to medical treatment. Financial toxicity has yet to be characterized among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) undergoing surgical management of their disease. This study investigated the risk of financial toxicity associated with undergoing surgery for IBD. METHODS: This study used a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample from 2015 to 2019. Adult patients who underwent IBD-related surgery were identified using the International Classification of Diseases (10th Revision) diagnostic and procedure codes and stratified into privately insured and uninsured groups. The primary outcome was risk of financial toxicity, defined as hospital admission charges that constituted 40% or more of patient's post-subsistence income. Secondary outcomes included total hospital admission cost and predictors of financial toxicity. RESULTS: The analytical cohort consisted of 6412 privately insured and 3694 uninsured patients. Overall median hospital charges were $21 628 (interquartile range $14 758-$35 386). Risk of financial toxicity was 86.5% among uninsured patients and 0% among insured patients. Predictors of financial toxicity included emergency admission, being in the lowest residential income quartile and having ulcerative colitis (compared to Crohn's disease). Additional predictors were being of Black race or male sex. CONCLUSION: Financial toxicity is a serious consequence of IBD-related surgery among uninsured patients. Given the pervasive nature of this consequence, future steps to support uninsured patients receiving surgery, in particular emergency surgery, related to their IBD are needed to protect this group from financial risk.


Asunto(s)
Precios de Hospital , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Pacientes no Asegurados , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Precios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/cirugía , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/economía , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Colitis Ulcerosa/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Enfermedad de Crohn/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Estrés Financiero/economía , Anciano , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Obes Surg ; 33(5): 1476-1485, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36922464

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a higher prevalence in patients with obesity, there is an increasing need to understand the safety of bariatric surgery for patients with advanced CKD. This study determined if short-term bariatric surgical outcomes and healthcare utilization differ in patients with advanced CKD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was performed. Patients with obesity who underwent bariatric surgery from 2015 to 2019 were included. Patients without CKD, with CKD, and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) were compared for outcome differences. Univariate and multivariable regression was used to determine the association between perioperative outcomes to CKD status. RESULTS: The unadjusted analysis found significantly higher mortality and overall complication rate in CKD and ESKD patients, however, after adjustment for confounders, only the ICU admission rate remained significantly higher for patients CKD compared to non-CKD patients (odds ratio 4.21, 95% CI [3.29-5.39]). Length of stay was longer for patients with CKD (mean difference (MD) 0.14 days, 95% CI, [0.04, 0.23]) and patients with ESKD (MD 0.27 days, 95% CI, [0.10, 0.43]) compared to non-CKD patients. Patients with ESKD had higher admission costs compared to non-CKD patients (MD $1982.65). CONCLUSION: Patients with CKD and ESKD have increased healthcare utilization and higher rates of ICU admission after bariatric surgery compared to non-CKD patients. Otherwise, there is no significant difference in other post-operative complications and mortality. Bariatric surgery may therefore be safely offered to this patient population in hospitals with on-site ICU capacity.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Fallo Renal Crónico , Obesidad Mórbida , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/cirugía , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...