Are all patients with sapheno-femoral junction incompetence the same? An ultrasound analysis to potentially predict recurrence after invasive treatments.

The sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ) and the great saphenous vein (GSV) are recognized as one of the main sources of reflux in chronic venous disease. Moreover, reflux time is considered as the main parameter to characterize GSV disease. Despite this, it is well-known in the clinical practice that not all patients with SFJ/GSV reflux are similar, in terms of disease severity and degree. Some other anatomical findings, such as SFJ and GSV diameters, as well as the absence/incompetence of suprasaphenic femoral valve (SFV) might be of interest to better "quantify" the disease severity. The aim of this paper is to describe, through a duplex scan analysis, the relationship between SFJ incompetence, GSV/SFJ diameter and SFV absence/incompetence, to identify if there are patients with "severe" GSV disease and a potential higher recurrence rate after invasive treatments.

Inferior selective crossectomy for great saphenous vein incompetence: Our experience.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the mid-term outcome after inferior selective crossectomy in a subset of patients with symptomatic chronic venous disease and both great saphenous vein and suprasaphenic valve incompetence.Methodsː Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted. During an eight-year period, 1095 ligations of all saphenofemoral junction inferior tributaries and great saphenous vein stripping were performed in 814 Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, Pathophysiology C2-C6 patients. Duplex ultrasound follow-up examinations were performed after 30 days, 6 months, and 2 years, and saphenofemoral junction hemodynamic patterns and varicose veins recurrence rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty patients completed the two-year follow-up period. At the 30-day Duplex ultrasound evaluations, two different hemodynamic patterns were described. Type 1, with physiological drainage of saphenofemoral junction superior tributaries, was observed in 214 patients. Type 2, without flow in saphenofemoral junction superior tributaries, was observed in six patients. Overall varicose vein recurrence rates were 0, 2.3, and 2.7% at the 30-day, 6-month, and 2-year follow-up examinations, respectively. At the two-year follow-up, Type 1 patients showed 0% varicose vein recurrence, while Type 2 patients showed 100%.Conclusionsː Inferior selective crossectomy seems to be a valid and safe option in case of both suprasaphenic valve and great saphenous vein incompetence. Duplex ultrasound evaluation, according to our protocol, allows us to identify two different saphenofemoral junction hemodynamic patterns that could predict varicose vein recurrence at mid-term. An optimal stump washing after inferior selective crossectomy, warranted by patency and large caliber saphenofemoral junction superior tributaries, seems to be the key point in preventing varicose vein recurrence in this context. However, large prospective studies regarding saphenofemoral junction modifications and varicose vein recurrence are needed to confirm these preliminary observations.