An Uncommon Culprit: Trapezius Dystonia as a Cause of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Case Report.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) results from compression of the neurovascular bundle in the thoracic outlet. Several etiologies can contribute to the development of thoracic outlet syndrome, including both congenital and acquired causes. Historically, trapezius pathology has not been considered a cause of TOS; however, here we report a patient with neurogenic TOS plus ipsilateral trapezius hypertonicity and hypertrophy who had significant symptomatic improvement following botulinum toxin injections to trapezius.

Improvement of Disability in Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome by Robotic First Rib Resection.

BACKGROUND: Robotic transthoracic first rib resection (R-FRR) has advantages over traditional approaches; however, its impact on postoperative neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) outcomes is unknown. Our primary objective was to determine improvement of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of pain and disability after R-FRR in nTOS. Our secondary objective was to compare improvement of patient-reported pain between R-FRR and supraclavicular FRR (SC-FRR) in nTOS. METHODS: We queried a prospectively maintained, single-surgeon, single-institution database for patients with nTOS undergoing R-FRR or SC-FRR with available preoperative and postoperative PROMs. PROMs included the Disability of the Arm, Hand, and Shoulder (DASH) questionnaire and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. RESULTS: Cohort 1 included 37 patients (32 women) undergoing 40 R-FRRs, with an average age of 36 years. Preoperative VAS and DASH (6.0 and 64.2, respectively) improved significantly at the first (2.8 and 35.0; P < .001 for both) and second postoperative visits (1.4 and 30.2; P < .01 for both) which occurred at 2.6 and 15.3 weeks, respectively. Cohort 2 included 57 R-FRRs performed in 53 patients and 35 SC-FRRs performed in 34 patients. The R-FRR and SC-FRR groups did not significantly differ in sex, age, hand dominance, TOS laterality, or preoperative VAS. At the first postoperative visit (2.4 weeks), R-FRR was associated with lower VAS scores (P = .023) and greater VAS improvement than SC-FRR (53% and 27% decrease, respectively; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: R-FRR results in significant improvement in disability and pain in nTOS and may have a greater impact on patient-reported pain than SC-FRR in the early postoperative period.

Digital Biomarkers for the Objective Assessment of Disability in Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) is a musculoskeletal disorder in which compression of the brachial plexus between the scalene muscles of the neck and the first rib results in disabling upper extremity pain and paresthesia. Currently there are no objective metrics for assessing the disability of nTOS or for monitoring response to its therapy. We aimed to develop digital biomarkers of upper extremity motor capacity that could objectively measure the disability of nTOS using an upper arm inertial sensor and a 20-s upper extremity task that provokes nTOS symptoms. We found that digital biomarkers of slowness, power, and rigidity statistically differentiated the affected extremities of patients with nTOS from their contralateral extremities (n = 16) and from the extremities of healthy controls (n = 13); speed and power had the highest effect sizes. Digital biomarkers representing slowness, power, and rigidity correlated with patient-reported outcomes collected with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the visual analog scale of pain (VAS); speed had the highest correlation. Digital biomarkers of exhaustion correlated with failure of physical therapy in treating nTOS; and digital biomarkers of slowness, power, and exhaustion correlated with favorable response to nTOS surgery. In conclusion, sensor-derived digital biomarkers can objectively assess the impairment of motor capacity resultant from nTOS, and correlate with patient-reported symptoms and response to therapy.

Safety of robotic first rib resection for thoracic outlet syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Robotic first rib resection (R-FRR) is an emerging approach in the field of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) that has technical advantages over traditional open approaches, including superior exposure of the first rib and freedom from retracting neurovascular structures. We set out to define the safety of R-FRR and compare it with that of the conventional supraclavicular approach (SC-FRR). METHODS: We queried a prospectively maintained, single-surgeon, single-institution database for all FRR operations performed for neurogenic TOS and venous TOS. Preoperative, intraoperative, and complications were compared between approaches. RESULTS: Seventy-two R-FRRs and 51 SC-FRRs were performed in 66 and 50 patients, respectively. These groups were not significantly different in age, body mass index, sex, type of TOS, or preoperative use of opioids. Length of procedure and hospital stay were not different between groups. Postoperative inpatient self-reported pain (visual analog scale score 4.7 vs 5.2; P = .049) and administered morphine milligram equivalents (37.5 vs 81.1 MME, P < .001) were significantly lower in R-FRR than SC-FRR. Brachial plexus palsy was less frequent after R-FRR than SC-FRR (1% vs 18%, P = .002) and resolved by 4 months in call cases. All cases were sensory palsies with the exception of 2 motor palsies, which were both in the SC-FRR group. In multivariable analyses, R-FRR was independently associated with less frequent total complications than SC-FRR (P = .002; odds ratio, 0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.39). CONCLUSIONS: R-FRR provides outstanding exposure of the first rib and eliminates retraction of the brachial plexus and its consequences.