Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pathology ; 49(1): 75-82, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27913044

RESUMEN

The advent of massively parallel sequencing has caused a paradigm shift in the ways cancer is treated, as personalised therapy becomes a reality. More and more laboratories are looking to introduce next generation sequencing (NGS) as a tool for mutational analysis, as this technology has many advantages compared to conventional platforms like Sanger sequencing. In Australia all massively parallel sequencing platforms are still considered in-house in vitro diagnostic tools by the National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA) and a comprehensive analytical validation of all assays, and not just mere verification, is a strict requirement before accreditation can be granted for clinical testing on these platforms. Analytical validation of assays on NGS platforms can prove to be extremely challenging for pathology laboratories. Although there are many affordable and easily accessible NGS instruments available, there are no standardised guidelines as yet for clinical validation of NGS assays. We present an accreditation development procedure that was both comprehensive and applicable in a setting of hospital laboratory for NGS services. This approach may also be applied to other NGS applications in service laboratories.


Asunto(s)
ADN de Neoplasias/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Mutación/genética , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/genética , Australia , Biopsia con Aguja Fina/métodos , Análisis Mutacional de ADN/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Humanos , Fijación del Tejido/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...