RESUMEN
Background: Foot complications are common in people with diabetes mellitus (DM), leading to increased health care utilization, heightened mortality risk, and notable recurrence rates even after treatment. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the impact of repeated occurrence of DM-related foot complications on the risk of all-cause mortality and to identify the potential risk factors associated with repeated events. Methods: People with DM admitted with foot complications (ulcer, skin and soft tissue infection, or osteomyelitis) from 2012 to 2014 were identified from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, with a 3-year follow-up for repeated events. We categorized the study subjects based on their cumulative number of hospital admissions with foot complications. Logistic regression was conducted to explore the potential risk factors associated with repeated diabetic foot events. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the associations between repeated diabetic foot events and all-cause mortality. Results: In this study, 28 754 eligible individuals were enrolled and classified into 3 groups: no repeated diabetic foot events (76.1%), 1 repeated event (16.0%), and 2 or more repeated events (7.9%). Logistic regression revealed that advanced age, male sex, congestive heart failure, dyslipidemia, hypertension, nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes-related preventable hospitalizations, and outpatient visits due to diabetic foot were significantly associated with repeated events of diabetic foot complications. Compared with those with no repeated events, the adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were 1.26 (95% CI, 1.19-1.34) for 1 repeated event and 1.36 (95% CI, 1.26-1.47) for 2 or more repeated events. Conclusions: The significant association between repeated diabetic foot and elevated mortality risk highlights the critical necessity for proactive and targeted patient care within clinical practice. More research to delve into the predictive factors related to the repeated occurrence of diabetic foot is needed to provide additional insights for prevention strategies.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The RECOVERY trial demonstrated that the use of dexamethasone is associated with a 36% lower 28-day mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 on invasive mechanical ventilation. Nevertheless, the optimal timing to start dexamethasone remains uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental study at National Taiwan University Hospital (Taipei, Taiwan) using propensity score matching to simulate a randomized controlled trial to receive or not to receive early dexamethasone (6 mg/day) during the first 7 days following the onset of symptoms. Treatment was standard protocol-based, except for the timing to start dexamethasone, which was left to physicians' decision. The primary outcome is 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes include secondary infection within 60 days and fulfilling the criteria of de-isolation within 20 days. RESULTS: A total of 377 patients with COVID-19 were enrolled. Early dexamethasone did not decrease 28-day mortality in all patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.10) or in patients who required O2 for severe/critical disease at admission (aOR, 1.05; 95%CI, 0.94-1.18); but is associated with a 24% increase in superinfection in all patients (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12-1.37) and a 23% increase in superinfection in patients of O2 for several/critical disease at admission (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.47). Moreover, early dexamethasone is associated with a 42% increase in likelihood of delayed clearance of SARS-CoV-2 virus (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.01-1.98). CONCLUSION: An early start of dexamethasone (within 7 days after the onset of symptoms) could be harmful to hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Dexametasona , Puntaje de Propensión , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , COVID-19/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Taiwán/epidemiología , Anciano , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite current guidelines for tuberculosis (TB) control in health care settings, which focused on smear-positive cases, prevention of nosocomial TB transmission continues to be a challenge. Here, we report the results of the first hospital-wide prospective study applying interferon-gamma release assay to investigate the role of smear-negative, culture-positive index cases in nosocomial TB transmission. METHODS: We prospectively identified cases of culture-confirmed smear-negative pulmonary TB receiving aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) and cases of culture-confirmed smear-positive pulmonary TB admitted at a medical center. Nosocomial transmission was evaluated by screening their close contacts for latent TB infection (LTBI) using an interferon-gamma release assay. RESULTS: A total of 93 smear-negative index receiving AGP and 122 smear-positive index were enrolled. Among them, 13 (14.0%) and 43 (35.2%) index cases, respectively, had secondary cases of LTBI (P < .001). Sputum smear negativity (adjusted odds ratio: 0.20 [0.08-0.48]) and AGP (sputum suction; adjusted odds ratio: 3.48 [1.34-9.05]) are independent factors of transmission. A similar proportion in the close contacts of the 2 index groups had LTBI (17 [15.3%] and 63 [16.0%], respectively), and the former index group contributed to 21.3% of the nosocomial transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Smear-negative, culture-positive index cases receiving AGPs could be as infectious as smear-positive index cases. Hospital TB control policy should also focus on the former group.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Tuberculosis Pulmonar , Humanos , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/transmisión , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/microbiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/aislamiento & purificación , Ensayos de Liberación de Interferón gamma , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Esputo/microbiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The role of environmental contamination in COVID-19 transmission within hospitals is still of interest due to the significant impact of outbreaks globally. However, there is a scarcity of data regarding the utilization of environmental sampling for informing infection control measures during SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed incident event investigations conducted at a single center from May 1, 2021, to August 31, 2021. Investigations were initiated following the identification of a COVID-19 confirmed case (referred to as the index case) who had stayed in a hospital area outside the dedicated COVID-19 ward/bed and without specific COVID-19 precautions. Measures to prevent intra-hospital spread included contact tracing, adjusted testing policies, isolation of confirmed cases, quarantine of close contacts, environmental disinfection, and PCR testing of environmental samples. RESULTS: Among the 18 incident events investigated, the index case was a healthcare personnel in 8 events, a patient in 8 events, and a caregiver in 2 events. The median number of confirmed COVID-19 cases within 14 days was 13 (IQR, 7-31) for events with SARS-CoV-2 RNA detected on environmental surfaces, compared to only one (IQR, 1-1.5) for events without surface contamination (P = 0.04). Environmental contamination was independently associated with a higher number of COVID-19 cases (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study highlights environmental contamination as an indicator of the severity of incident events and provides a framework for incident event management, including a protocol for environmental sampling. Implementing these measures can help prevent the spread of COVID-19 within healthcare facilities.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , ARN Viral , Taiwán/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención TerciariaRESUMEN
COVID-19 has exposed major weaknesses in the healthcare settings. The surge in COVID-19 cases increases the demands of health care, endangers vulnerable patients, and threats occupational safety. In contrast to a hospital outbreak of SARS leading to a whole hospital quarantined, at least 54 hospital outbreaks following a COVID-19 surge in the community were controlled by strengthened infection prevention and control measures for preventing transmission from community to hospitals as well as within hospitals. Access control measures include establishing triage, epidemic clinics, and outdoor quarantine stations. Visitor access restriction is applied to inpatients to limit the number of visitors. Health monitoring and surveillance is applied to healthcare personnel, including self-reporting travel declaration, temperature, predefined symptoms, and test results. Isolation of the confirmed cases during the contagious period and quarantine of the close contacts during the incubation period are critical for containment. The target populations and frequency of SARS-CoV-2 PCR and rapid antigen testing depend on the level of transmission. Case investigation and contact tracing should be comprehensive to identify the close contacts to prevent further transmission. These facility-based infection prevention and control strategies help reduce hospital transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to a minimum in Taiwan.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Taiwán/epidemiología , Cuarentena , Trazado de Contacto/métodos , HospitalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: MVC-COV1901 is a protein vaccine based on the same SARS-CoV-2 strain used in mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273. Data are lacking on immunogenicity and safety of MVC-COV1901 as heterologous boost for people already received one dose of mRNA-1273. METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind trial that recruited adults aged 20-70 years who previously received a single dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine and were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a second dose with the homologous vaccine or protein-based MVC-COV1901 8-12 weeks after the first dose. The primary outcome was neutralizing antibody titers in terms of the geometric mean titer (GMT) 14 days after the second dose. Safety was assessed in all participants who received a dose of the study vaccine. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05079633). RESULTS: From September 30 to November 5, 2021, 144 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to the MVC-COV1901 boost group (n = 72) or the mRNA-1273 boost group (n = 72). The neutralizing antibodies on Day 15 and the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers on Day 15 and 29 of homologous mRNA-1273 were significantly higher than those of heterologous mRNA-1273/MVC-COV1901. Cellular immune responses were comparable in both groups. However, adverse events were much more frequent after the mRNA-1273 boost than after the MVC-COV1901 boost. CONCLUSION: Our results show that heterologous boost with MVC-COV1901 yielded an inferior immunogenicity but significantly fewer adverse events, compared with homologous boost with mRNA-1273. In people experienced severe adverse events after prime dose of mRNA-1273, as well as in periods when the supply of mRNA-1273 is limited, MVC-COV1901 could serve as an acceptable alternative heterologous boost.
Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Vacunación , Adulto , Humanos , Método Doble Ciego , Inmunoglobulina G , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos AntiviralesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To report the safety and immunogenicity profile of a protein subunit vaccine (MVC-COV1901) compared to AZD1222 and mRNA-1273 when given as a third (booster) dose to individuals who have completed different primary vaccine regimens. METHODS: Individuals were classified according to their primary vaccine regimens, including two-dose MVC-COV1901, AZD1222, or mRNA-1273. A third dose of either half-dose MVC-COV1901, full-dose MVC-COV1901, standard-dose AZD1222, half-dose mRNA-1273 was administered in a 1:1:1:1 treatment ratio to individuals with an interval range of 84-365 days after the second dose. Endpoints included safety, humoral immunogenicity, and cell-mediated immune response on trial days 15 and 29. Exploratory endpoint included testing against variants of concern (Omicron). RESULTS: Overall, 803 participants were randomized and boosted - 201 received half-dose MVC-COV1901, 196 received full-dose MVC-COV1901, 203 received AZD1222, and 203 received half-dose mRNA-1273. Reactogenicity was mild to moderate, and less in the MVC-COV1901 booster group. Heterologous boosting provided the best immunogenic response. Boosting with mRNA-1273 in MVC-COV1901 primed individuals induced the highest antibody titers, even against Omicron, and cell-mediated immune response. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, MVC-COV1901 as a booster showed the best safety profiles. MVC-COV1901 as a primary series, with either homologous or heterologous booster, elicited the highest immunogenic response. CLINICALTRIALS: gov registration NCT05197153.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH) who have no serological responses to their primary hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccination or have seroreversion after successful primary vaccination, the optimal revaccination strategy remains unclear. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized clinical trial, PWH who tested negative for anti-HAV antibodies after receiving a standard 2-dose series of primary HAV vaccination were enrolled and assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 1 dose (the 1-dose group) or 2 doses of HAV vaccine administered 4 weeks apart (the 2-dose group). Serological response rates and anti-HAV antibody titers were compared at weeks 24 and 48. RESULTS: Of the 153 participants (77 in the 1-dose group and 76 in the 2-dose group), the overall serological response rates at week 48 after revaccination were similar between the 2 groups (2- vs 1-dose, 80.2% vs 71.4%, P = .20). However, anti-HAV antibody titers were consistently higher in the 2-dose group than in the 1-dose group. In subgroup analysis, PWH who were nonresponders to primary HAV vaccination were significantly more likely to mount a serological response after 2-dose HAV revaccination (68.4% vs 44.1%, P = .038). No severe adverse events were reported throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Two-dose HAV revaccination administered 4 weeks apart yielded similar serological responses as 1-dose revaccination among PWH who were nonresponders or had seroreversion after primary HAV vaccination. The 2-dose revaccination schedule generated significantly higher anti-HAV antibody titers and was more likely to elicit serological responses at week 48 among PWH who were nonresponders to primary HAV vaccination. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03855176.
Asunto(s)
Virus de la Hepatitis A , Hepatitis A , Humanos , Inmunización Secundaria , VIH , Anticuerpos de Hepatitis A , Vacunación , Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A , Hepatitis A/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 rebound is usually reported among patients experiencing concurrent symptomatic and viral rebound. But longitudinal viral RT-PCR results from early stage to rebound of COVID-19 was less characterized. Further, identifying the factors associated with viral rebound after nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV/r) and molnupiravir may expand understanding of COVID-19 rebound. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data and sequential viral RT-PCR results from COVID-19 patients receiving oral antivirals between April and May, 2022. Viral rebound was defined by the degree of viral load increase (ΔCt ≥ 5 units). RESULTS: A total of 58 and 27 COVID-19 patients taking NMV/r and molnupiravir, respectively, were enrolled. Patients receiving NMV/r were younger, had fewer risk factors for disease progression and faster viral clearance rate compared to those receiving molnupiravr (All P < 0.05). The overall proportion of viral rebound (n = 11) was 12.9%, which was more common among patients receiving NMV/r (10 [17.2%] vs. 1 [3.7%], P = 0.16). Of them, 5 patients experienced symptomatic rebound, suggesting the proportion of COVID-19 rebound was 5.9%. The median interval to viral rebound was 5.0 (interquartile range, 2.0-8.0) days after completion of antivirals. Initial lymphopenia (<0.8 × 109/L) was associated with viral rebound among overall population (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-21.71), and remained significant (aOR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.05-19.25) even when patients receiving NMV/r were considered. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest viral rebound after oral antivirals may be more commonly observed among lymphopenic individuals in the context of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 variant.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales , COVID-19 , Humanos , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection due to occupational exposure. We aim to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs during epidemic outbreak of omicron variant in Taiwan. METHODS: Sequential reserved serum samples collected from our previous study during December 2021 and July 2022 were tested for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP). Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection was defined as positive either of anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein, rapid antigen test or polymerase chain reaction. Retrospective chart review and a questionnaire were used to access the symptoms and risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: Totally 300 participants (69.3% female) with a median age of 37.9 years were enrolled. A significant increase incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was found before and during community outbreak (11.91 versus 230.93 per 100,000 person-days, P < 0.001), which was a trend paralleling that observed in the general population. For 61 SARS-CoV-2 infected participants, nine (14.8%) were asymptomatic. Multivariate analysis revealed recent contact with a SARS-CoV-2 infected household (odds ratio [OR], 7.01; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.70-13.30; P < 0.001) and co-existed underlying autoimmune diseases (OR, 4.46; 95% CI, 1.28-15.51; P = 0.019) were significant risk factors associated with acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs. CONCLUSION: Community factors, such as closely contact with SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals and underlying immune suppression status, were significant factors for acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs. We suggest the application of appropriate infection control measures for HCWs should be maintained to reduce risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taiwán/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Personal de Salud , VacunaciónRESUMEN
Background: In addition to active surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrier, MRSA nasal screening can be valuable for antibiotic de-escalation. This study aimed to assess the correlations between the MRSA nasal swab and subsequent culture results in patients admitted to medical intensive care units (MICU). The impact of MRSA nasal swab on the antibiotic duration was also evaluated. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study enrolled patients who received glycopeptides in the MICU of a medical center in 2019. Patients treated with glycopeptides for over 2 days before MICU admission were excluded. The associated data were collected through the electronic medical record system. The negative predictive value (NPV) of MRSA nasal swabs for MRSA infection was calculated, and their influence on empirical glycopeptide treatment duration was analyzed. Results: Of the 338 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 277 underwent MRSA nasal screening. The NPV of MRSA-negative nasal swab for subsequent MRSA infection was 98.4%. The glycopeptide treatment duration of the patients with and without nasal screening was not significantly different (4.2 ± 2.8 vs 4.4 ± 3.0 days, p = 0.577). Of the 120 patients with MRSA-negative nasal swab and no subsequent MRSA infection, 75 continued empirical glycopeptides therapy. The additional treatment time was 3 days (interquartile range: 2-6 days). Conclusion: The MRSA nasal swabs have high NPV for MRSA infection in critically ill patients. However, it has no impact on the empirical glycopeptide treatment duration. The value of MRSA nasal swabs should be advocated to optimize antibiotic therapy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Healthcare personnel (HCP) at the front line of care are exposed to occupational hazards that place them at risk for infection, which then endanger patient safety and compromise the capability of the healthcare workforce. As of March 8, 2021 more than 420,170 HCP in US had been infected with SARS CoV-2 with 1388 deaths. In two Taiwan hospitals COVID-19 outbreaks involved HCP and resulted in shutdown of service. This report describes our prospective health surveillance of the HCP and COVID-19 containment measures in a teaching hospital in Taiwan during Jan. 1 through June 30, 2020. METHODS: We prospectively monitored incidents, defined as an HCP with the predefined symptoms, reported by HCP through the web-based system. HCP were managed based on an algorithm that included SARS CoV-2 RNA PCR testing. Infection prevention and control policy/practice were reviewed. RESULTS: This hospital took care of 17 confirmed COVID-19 cases during the study period and the first Case was admitted on January 23, 2020. Among the 14,210 HCP, there were 367 incident events. Of 283 HCP tested for SARS CoV-2, 179 had predefined symptoms. These included 10 HCP who met the national case definition for COVID-19 infection and 169 based on Extended COVID-19 Community Screening program. The other 104 asymptomatic HCP were tested based on hospital policy. All of them had tested negative. CONCLUSION: We attribute our success in preventing COVID-19 infections among HCP to rapid, proactive, decisive, integrated national and institutional response in the early stages of the epidemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Centros Médicos Académicos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Taiwán/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Studies had shown that severe cases of COVID-19 tend to have high viral loads and correlate with functional impairment of cytotoxic lymphocytes, and the features of cytokine storm syndrome are similar to manifestations of severe influenza that have been partially explained by suppressed perforin expression. To test the hypothesis that the spike glycoprotein from SARS-CoV-2 may inhibit the perforin expression, we determined the kinetics of immune responses of CD8+ T cells to low dose (LD) or high dose (HD) of S1 stimulation through an in vitro dendritic cell (DC)-T cell model over seven days of incubation. The cytotoxic activity and intracellular perforin expression of CD8+ T cells induced by HD-S1-presenting DCs were aberrantly lower than those induced by LD-S1-presenting DCs from day three of incubation. Discrepantly, the levels of lymphoproliferation and cytokine (interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α) production induced by HD-S1-presenting DCs were significantly higher than those induced by LD-S1-presenting DCs from day four. The dose-related responses between doses of S1 and intracellular perforin expression showed a significant linear correlation with a negative slope. In conclusion, the S1 subunit may suppress the perforin expression in CD8+ T cells to decrease the cytotoxic capacity to kill spike-presenting cells in a dose-dependent manner; the persistence of antigen presentation may result in an overproduction of interferon-γ and subsequent proinflammatory cytokines. That may help explain the insufficient cytotoxicity against high quantities of viruses or highly replicated strains of SARS-CoV-2 in severe cases of COVID-19.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: HIV-1 infection remains incurable through combination antiretroviral therapy. Previous studies have shown statins have immunomodulatory effects, and interruption of statins may cause an immune rebound. METHODS: In this proof-of-concept study, we longitudinally assessed the impact of immune rebound by cyclic treatment-interruption (CTI) of rosuvastatin on the reversal of HIV latency. The HIV-1-infected persons with stable viral control were considered to be enrolled for CTI of rosuvastatin with a fixed 12-week interval for 72 weeks (3 treatment-interruption cycles). HIV-1 Gag-specific T-cell responses, cell-associated RNA, and proviral DNA were determined. RESULTS: From Feb 2017 to Dec 2019, 10 subjects were enrolled. During the 72-week follow-up, their CD4+ T-cell counts did not significantly change, and plasma HIV RNA remained undetectable. Transient but remarkable increases in levels of cell-associated RNA, Gag-specific interferon-γ production from CD4+ T cells and Gag-specific CD8+ cytotoxic capacity were detected shortly after stopping rosuvastatin in every cycle of CTI of rosuvastatin. Furthermore, there was a 2.63-fold reduction (range, 1.41-4.82) in proviral DNA levels (P = 0.005) during the 72-week follow-up. A significant linear association was demonstrated between their nadir CD4+ T-cell counts and the fold decrease in proviral DNA levels (R = 0.81, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: It may be possible to reverse viral latency in CD4+ T cells, activate Gag-specific T cells, and reduce viral reservoir size through CTI of rosuvastatin in HIV-1-infected subjects with stable combination antiretroviral therapy, especially in those with nadir CD4+ T-cell counts > 350 cells/µL.
Asunto(s)
Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/metabolismo , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , VIH-1/efectos de los fármacos , Rosuvastatina Cálcica/uso terapéutico , Latencia del Virus/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/metabolismo , Estudios de Cohortes , Esquema de Medicación , Productos del Gen gag , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , ARN Viral/genética , ARN Viral/metabolismo , Rosuvastatina Cálcica/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at the frontline during the pandemic of COVID-19 globally. According to the WHO situation report at April 17, there were 22,â073 HCWs contracted the infection. Whether the infection control policy and practice in the hospital setting can protect the HCWs is an important issue. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional serology study in a tertiary care hospital in Taiwan to explore the sero-prevalence rate among HCWs. The participants are enrolled on a voluntary basis. A structured questionnaire was collected to gather the epidemiology character and risk factors for potential exposure. ELISA tests as Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Abbott) and Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche) were used to detect antibody responses. If any of the tests was positive, a western blot assay was used for confirmation. RESULTS: There were 194 HCWs participated during July 1 to Aug. 31, 2020. The mean age was 36.3 ± 10.4. More than half of the participants had possible hospital associated risk for COVID-19 exposure (110/192, 57.3%) and 64 had possible community risk for COVID-19 exposure (64/194, 33.0%). There was only one participant had positive test by Architect IgG test and confirmed to be negative for seasonal coronavirus and SARS-CoV-2 antibody. (Mikrogen Diagnostik, Germany). CONCLUSION: The cross-sectional serology study in a tertiary care hospital in Taiwan revealed no HCWs had positive serology response to SARS-CoV-2. We believe that the infection control policy and practice in the hospital and in the community are both important to prevent the disease transmission.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Personal de Salud , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Hospitales , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Taiwán/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The incidence of mastitis has increased, and this disease can lead to long antibiotic courses and complications. Here, we aimed to identify the factors associated with antibiotic duration and recurrence of complicated mastitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Taiwan. All hospitalized patients diagnosed with mastitis (ICD-9 code 611.0) from Jan. 1, 2012, to Dec. 31, 2016, were enrolled. Patient characteristics and clinical data were obtained from the medical charts. Recurrence was defined as mastitis within the first year after the discontinuation of antibiotics for at least 7 days. RESULTS: In total, 214 females with a median age of 37 years old (IQR 33-45) were enrolled. A total of 148 patients (69.2%) underwent debridement, and 122 (57.0%) underwent biopsy. Histopathological examinations revealed granulation tissue in 44.6% (62/139) of the patients. Positive cultures were obtained in 65.9% (141/214) of the patients. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (64/141, 45.4%) was the most common pathogen, followed by Corynebacterium species (42/141, 29.8%). The median hospitalization length and antibiotic course were 7 (IQR 4-13) and 37 days (IQR 22-77), respectively. Three patients died of breast cancer during treatment. The recurrence rate was 18.5% (39/211). Younger age, corynebacterial infection, and pregnancy were associated with longer treatment durations (P < 0.001, 0.003, <0.001). Corynebacterial infection was associated with a 2.16-fold (95% CI: 1.11-4.20) increase in recurrence after adjusting for age. CONCLUSION: Corynebacterial infection is associated with longer treatment courses and an increased recurrence rate of complicated mastitis. Therefore, specific treatments should be considered.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Mastitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Corynebacterium/clasificación , Corynebacterium/efectos de los fármacos , Corynebacterium/genética , Corynebacterium/aislamiento & purificación , Duración de la Terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Mastitis/microbiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Staphylococcus/clasificación , Staphylococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus/genética , Staphylococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Taiwán , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This study analyzed the effects of the General Medicine Faculty Training Program (GMFTP), which was implemented in 2009. The training program includes a 7-hour basic training (BT) to introduce ways of teaching and assessing the 6 core competencies identified by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, and a 40-hour clinical training program. METHODS: Physicians from different hospitals attended the GMFTPs. Since 2010, we have been using quick tests to assess trainees' familiarity of core competencies. Knowledge improvement (KI) was defined as the difference between post-BT and pre-BT test scores. Since 2013, we have been annually mailing questionnaires to assess trainees' teaching confidence (TC) of core competencies. We analyzed the correlations between trainees' characteristics, KIs, and TCs. RESULTS: Between year 2009 and 2017, a total of 319 attending physicians (257 male, 62 female), with a mean age of 39.1 ± 6.2 years, completed the GMFTPs. Significant KI (32.6-55.4) was noted. There were no correlations between trainees' characteristics and KIs. The mean TCs for the 6 core competences were all above 4.0 (based on a 5-point Likert scale). TCs were positively correlated with age during GMFTP training, age when responding to the questionnaire, and duration between training and the last time responding to the questionnaire. TC showed no correlation with sex, hospitals, departments, or KI. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of teaching core competencies improved immediately after BT, but KIs did not correlate with TCs in long-term follow-up. After the training program, physicians' teaching confidence increased over time.
Asunto(s)
Acreditación , Competencia Clínica , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Docentes Médicos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Adulto , Concienciación , Femenino , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos , Desarrollo de Programa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , TaiwánRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART) is recommended for HIV-1 infected patients but may lead to intolerance or poor adherence. Structured treatment interruption (STI) is a strategy for drug holiday or to boost HIV-specific immunity. But the long-term outcome of STI was never reported in literature. METHODS: This is a single-center observational study. We followed the HIV-infected patients who already had a stable viral suppression and voluntarily started temporary STI with a fixed 12-week interval after counseling, evaluation and education. HIV-1-specific T cell response was also measured in some patients. RESULTS: Totally 34 HIV-infected patients received temporary STI since July, 2006. 18 patients completed 10-year follow-up. All patients received protease inhibitors (PI)-based ART before and during temporary STI. The patients received temporary STI with a period of 36-85 weeks. All of them reached viral suppression after 12 weeks of restarting continuous ART. No viral rebound or opportunistic disease was recorded during follow-up. No adverse event or comorbidity was attributed to STI. The plasma viral load (PVL) at the end of STI was significantly lower than baseline PVL in patients with a longer duration of STI (≤36 weeks vs. >36 weeks, P = 0.005). The T cell response study revealed that cyclically increased HIV-1-specific T cell response after starting STI in patients with baseline CD4+ count >350/µL. CONCLUSION: Temporary STI may not lead to worse long-term outcome among highly selected patients. The policy may partially control viral replication through reminding the HIV-1 specific T cell immunity.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Carga Viral , Adulto , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , VIH-1 , Humanos , Inmunidad Celular , Masculino , Linfocitos T/inmunología , TaiwánRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Beginning from 2015-2016, unprecedented large outbreaks of acute hepatitis A that predominantly affected men who have sex with men (MSM) reemerged across the continents. We assessed the impact of an early initiated hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccination campaign that targeted MSM living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) during the 2015-2017 hepatitis A outbreak in Taiwan. METHODS: First, we ascertained the effectiveness of HAV vaccination for MSM living with HIV using a nested case-control study of 1470 persons living with HIV who were initially HAV-seronegative. We then fitted a model of HAV transmission among MSM, risk-structured by HIV status, to the actual epidemic curve of reported acute hepatitis A cases in Taiwan during 2015-2017. RESULTS: Fifty-five cases of acute hepatitis A were matched to 220 controls. Single-dose and 2-dose HAV vaccination provided protection rates of 96.1% and 97.8% among recipient MSM living with HIV, respectively. Model fitting yielded basic reproductive number estimates of 7.26 (MSM living with HIV) and 3.04 (MSM not living with HIV). In a counterfactual scenario without an HAV vaccination campaign, the outbreak would have involved 7153 hepatitis A cases during 2015-2017 in contrast to the 1352 that were observed. We therefore estimated that the HAV vaccination campaign averted 80.7% (sensitivity analysis, 48.8%-92.7%) of acute hepatitis A cases that would otherwise have occurred by the end of 2017. CONCLUSIONS: The early initiated HAV vaccination campaign, which targeted MSM living with HIV, very effectively curtailed the 2015-2017 hepatitis A outbreak in Taiwan.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Hepatitis A , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Hepatitis A/epidemiología , Hepatitis A/prevención & control , Homosexualidad Masculina , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización , Masculino , Taiwán/epidemiología , VacunaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intranasal influenza vaccines may provide protective efficacy by inducing both systemic antibodies and local secretory IgA. Live attenuated intranasal vaccines are not feasible for high-risk groups. A previously constructed inactivated vaccine with adjuvant revealed an association with neurological events in some studies. In this phase II trial, we aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasal influenza vaccine with a novel adjuvant, heat-labile enterotoxin (LT)-derived from E. coli (LTh(αK)). METHODS: This study is a multicenter, randomized controlled, double-blind, phase II trial of an intranasal influenza vaccine containing 22.5 µg of the hemagglutinin (HA) antigen of three influenza strains in combination with 2 different LTh(αK) adjuvant doses (group 1: 30 µg; group 2: 45 µg) in subjects 20-70 years old. The control vaccine was 22.5 µg of influenza HA antigen alone (group 3). The vaccine was intranasally administered on days 1 and 8. Serum anti-HA antibody and nasal secretory IgA were measured, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded prevaccination and 29 (±2) days postvaccination. RESULTS: Of 354 participants randomized in the study, 340 received two vaccine doses. AEs were mostly mild, and there was no discontinuation related to the vaccine. Only a higher frequency of diarrhea after the first dose was noted among group 2 (11.5%) than among group 3 (2.8%), and there was no significant difference after the second dose. The three groups had comparable serum anti-HA antibody immunogenicity. However, the adjuvanted vaccines induced greater mucosal IgA antibody production than the control vaccine. In a subgroup analysis, group 1 participants achieved adequate immunogenicity among both 20- to 60- and 61- to 70-year-old participants. CONCLUSION: The intranasal influenza vaccine adjuvanted with LTh(αK) is generally safe and could provide systemic and local antibody responses. Adjuvanted vaccines were significantly more immunogenic than the nonadjuvanted control vaccine in mucosal immunity. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03784885.