Fluorescent Cholangiography in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Updated Canadian Experience.

Background. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most common general surgery procedures in Canada with approximately 100 000 cases performed per year. Bile duct injury remains a morbid complication with an incidence rate of 0.3% to 0.5%. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent cholangiography is a noninvasive technology aiding in real-time identification of biliary structures for safe dissection within Calot's triangle. The objectives were to provide an update to our initial experience with ICG aiding in the identification of biliary structures and ensuring that no adverse patient reactions occurred with ICG administration. Methods. Prospective case series from 2016 to 2018 for elective LC with ICG technology performed at a single academic teaching institution. Patient demographics, indications for operation, biliary structures visualized, amount of ICG used, operative times, and complications were recorded. Results. One hundred eight cases were included for review. The cystic duct, common hepatic duct, and common bile duct were identified with ICG in 90%, 48%, and 84% of cases, respectively. ICG simultaneously visualized at least 2 of 3 biliary structures 83.4% of the time. Only 1 biliary structure was identified in 10% of cases. No biliary structures were identified in 6% of cases. Mean initial ICG dose given was 1.65 mL. No adverse patient reactions to ICG were noted. Conclusions. This updated series illustrates that administration of ICG enhances visualization of the biliary system during outpatient LC. ICG is safe and its application should be further studied in early LC for acute cholecystitis.

Fluorescent cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the initial Canadian experience.

BACKGROUND: Bile duct injury remains a worrisome complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescent cholangiography (FC) is a new approach that facilitates real-time intraoperative identification of biliary anatomy. This technology is hoped to improve the safety of dissection within Calot's triangle. METHOD: Demographics, intraoperative details, and subjective surgeon data were recorded for elective cholecystectomy cases involving ICG. Goals were to identify rates of bile duct identification, and assess the perceived benefit of the device. RESULTS: ICG was used in 12 biliary cases in Canada. Visualization rates of the cystic and common bile ducts were 100% and 83%, respectively. Also, 83% of surgeons felt that FC incorporated smoothly into the operation. No complications have been related to the technology. CONCLUSIONS: FC allows noninvasive real-time visualization of the extrahepatic biliary tree. This novel technique has received positive feedback in its initial Canadian use and will likely be a durable adjunct for minimally invasive surgery.

Rigid vs articulating instrumentation for task completion in single-port surgery.

BACKGROUND: Single-port access surgery (SPA) may provide benefits but there is a steep learning curve. We compare traditional in-line instruments with articulating instruments. METHODS: Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery peg transfer task was performed using a 3-port approach or SPA device. Standard rigid instrumentation was compared with articulating instrumentation. RESULTS: Twenty surgeons completed all tasks. Average time using a conventional approach was shorter than SPA (144 ± 54 vs 198 ± 74 seconds, P < .001). Articulating instruments required longer procedural time than rigid instrumentation (201 ± 66 vs 141 ± 58 seconds, P < .001). In the conventional model, task time was lower with rigid instruments than with articulating instruments (108 vs 179 seconds, P < .001). Task time in the SPA model was lower with rigid instruments (173 vs 223 seconds, P =.013). CONCLUSIONS: All tasks required longer time to complete in SPA when compared with a conventional approach. Articulating instruments have an increased benefit in SPA surgery.

Using three-dimensional laparoscopy as a novel training tool for novice trainees compared with two-dimensional laparoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic skills training is an essential component of general surgery training. This study proposes the use of three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy as the initial training tool for beginners to shorten the learning curve. METHODS: This study evaluates the surgical performance and subjective experience of junior and senior trainees with 3D versus two-dimensional laparoscopy. Peg transfer task was used as the objective time measurement. A subjective evaluation of the 2 systems using a questionnaire was also used. RESULTS: The mean difference in the juniors was 16.33 seconds, while in the seniors it was only 3.46 seconds (P = .036). The time difference between groups was much smaller in the 3D than the two-dimensional (P = .14 vs .02) laparoscopy. In the subjective evaluation, the novice group also scored significantly higher for the 3D system in the bimanual dexterity category (P = .004, .007). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of using 3D laparoscopy for laparoscopic skills training in novices.

Objective assessment of laparoscopic skills: dual-task approach.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of surgical performance is often accomplished with traditional methods that often provide only subjective data. Trainees who perform well on a simulator in a controlled environment may not perform well in a real operating room environment with distractions. This project uses the ideas of dual-task methodology and applies them to the assessment of performance of laparoscopic surgical skills. The level of performance on distracting secondary tasks while trying to perform a primary task becomes an indirect but objective measure of the surgical skill of the trainee. METHODS: Nine surgery residents and 6 experienced laparoscopic surgeons performed 3 primary tasks on a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator (camera position, grasping, and cholecystectomy) while being distracted by 3 secondary tasks (counting beeps, selective responses, and mental arithmetic). Completion time and error rates were recorded for each combination of tasks. RESULTS: When performed separately, time to completion and error rates for primary and secondary tasks were similar for learners and experts. When performing the tasks simultaneously, learners had more errors than experts. Error rates increased for learners when distracting tasks became more difficult or required more attention. Expert surgeons maintained consistent error rates despite the increasing difficulty of task combinations. CONCLUSIONS: The use of dual-task methodology may help trainers to identify which surgical trainees require more preparation before entering the real operating room environment. Expert surgeons are capable of maintaining performance levels on a primary task in the face of distractions that may occur in the operating room.

Quantifying surgeon's contribution to team effectiveness on a mixed team with a junior surgeon.

BACKGROUND: A surgical team often consists of an experienced surgeon and surgeons in training. This project quantified the contribution of the experienced surgeon to the teamwork in a team comprised of 1 experienced and 1 novice surgeon (Mixed Team). METHODS: An experienced and a novice surgeon in a Mixed Team were required to complete a peg transportation task and an intracorporeal suture task collaboratively. Tasks were evaluated by a summative score (up to 100 points) that was calculated on task speed and accuracy. Performances of 24 Mixed Teams were compared to 24 Novice Teams (each composed of 2 novices) and 8 Expert Teams (each composed of 2 experienced surgeons). RESULTS: The Mixed Teams performed better (67.6 points) than the Novice Teams (51.3; P < .001) but worse than the Expert Teams (88.3; P < .001). When examining individual performance in the Mixed Teams, we observed that experienced surgeons maintained their superior performance like they did in the Expert Teams (P = .153). Novices in the Mixed Teams, however, showed markedly better performances than they did in the Novice Teams (P = .024). CONCLUSION: Instant guidance and instruction from experienced surgeons inspire novices' performance, providing a foundation for surgical teamwork effectiveness.