Streptococcus intermedius causing primary bacterial ventriculitis in a patient with severe periodontitis - a case report.

BACKGROUND: Streptococcus intermedius is a member of the S. anginosus group and is part of the normal oral microbiota. It can cause pyogenic infections in various organs, primarily in the head and neck area, including brain abscesses and meningitis. However, ventriculitis due to periodontitis has not been reported previously. CASE PRESENTATION: A 64-year-old male was admitted to the hospital with a headache, fever and later imbalance, blurred vision, and general slowness. Neurological examination revealed nuchal rigidity and general clumsiness. Meningitis was suspected, and the patient was treated with dexamethasone, ceftriaxone and acyclovir. A brain computer tomography (CT) scan was normal, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Gram staining and bacterial cultures remained negative, so the antibacterial treatment was discontinued. Nine days after admission, the patient's condition deteriorated. The antibacterial treatment was restarted, and a brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed ventriculitis. A subsequent CT scan showed hydrocephalus, so a ventriculostomy was performed. In CSF Gram staining, chains of gram-positive cocci were observed. Bacterial cultures remained negative, but a bacterial PCR detected Streptococcus intermedius. An orthopantomography revealed advanced periodontal destruction in several teeth and periapical abscesses, which were subsequently operated on. The patient was discharged in good condition after one month. CONCLUSIONS: Poor dental health can lead to life-threatening infections in the central nervous system, even in a completely healthy individual. Primary bacterial ventriculitis is a diagnostic challenge, which may result in delayed treatment and increased mortality.

Feasibility and long-term stability of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with lateral osteotomy.

Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) has become a widely used and acceptable means to expand the maxilla in adolescents and adult patients. The method takes advantage of bone formation at the maxillary edges of the midline, while they are separated by an external force. The purpose of the present retrospective investigation was to evaluate the feasibility and long-term stability of maxillary expansion in patients in whom lateral pre-expansion osteotomy had been performed. The subjects were 20 patients (14 females, six males, mean age 30.6 years, range 16.2-44.2 years) whose malocclusions were treated solely or partly with SARME during 1988-1996. Two orthodontists carried out the post-orthodontic expansion treatment. The surgical technique followed a minimally invasive osteotomy on the lateral maxillary walls. Study models were obtained before surgery (T1), once expansion and the following orthodontic treatment were completed, before possible second-stage osteotomy (T2), and at long-term follow-up (T3). Using the study models, the width of the dental arch was measured with a digital sliding calliper. In addition, transverse occlusal relationships were examined at each time point. The results indicated that (1) SARME is possible when the minimally invasive operation technique is used, (2) long-term stability of maxillary expansion following the present technique compares favourably with the widening and stability achieved with other, more invasive, osteotomies. With age, several possible uncertainties are introduced to affect the course of SARME adversely. Therefore, more extensive osteotomies can be recommended in older patients.

Costs of surgical-orthodontic treatment in community hospital care: an analysis of the different phases of treatment.

To determine the distribution of costs and various influencing factors in the entire process of surgical-orthodontic treatment in community hospital care, a retrospective study was carried out. The records and radiographs of 99 community hospital patients operated on between 1994 and 2001 were included. Cost analysis data were gathered from 4 phases of treatment: the orthodontics, the surgical outpatient assessments, the surgery/surgeries, and the inpatient period. The results showed that the surgical phases together are responsible for roughly 61% of the costs, 28% of which were attributed to the surgical operation itself. Orthodontics made up approximately 39% of the total costs, with an average of 26 visits. The average total costs of all treatments were US $6,206 +/- 912. Patients that could be operated on with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible only had the lowest costs, and those who required bimaxillary osteotomies had the highest costs. Of the several clinical and cephalometric measurements made in this study, only skeletal open bite and orthodontic space closure after tooth extraction were found to affect the costs. It can be concluded that surgical-orthodontic treatment is a rather expensive way to correct dentofacial malocclusions due to the high costs of the surgical phase. Skeletal open bite constituted the most costly entity, while malocclusion resulting from mandibular deformity was the cheapest.