Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Five Year Review.

Ovarian cancer is a malignant disease that affects thousands of patients every year. Currently, we use surgical techniques for early-stage cancer and chemotherapy treatment combinations for advanced stage cancer. Several novel therapies are currently being investigated, with gene therapy and stem cell therapy being the corner stone of this investigation. We conducted a thorough search on PubMed and gathered up-to-date information regarding epithelial ovarian cancer therapies. We present, in the current review, all novel treatments that were investigated in this field over the past five years, with a particular focus on local treatment.

Ovarian Stimulation with FSH Alone versus FSH plus a GnRH Antagonist for Elective Freezing in an Oocyte Donor/Recipient Programme: A Protocol for a Pilot Multicenter Observational Study.

Preliminary data have shown that it is possible to attempt in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment in fresh cycles without the use of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist or any other medication to prevent the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge during ovarian stimulation. To date, there is no information on this topic in the context of a prospective controlled trial. However, as prevention of the LH surge is an established procedure in fresh cycles, the question is whether such a study can be performed in frozen cycles. We aim to perform a pilot study in order to compare the efficacy of a protocol using FSH alone with that of a protocol using follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) plus a GnRH antagonist for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in cycles of elective freezing in the context of a donor/recipient program. This is a seven-center, two-arm prospective pilot cohort study conducted at the respective Assisted Reproductive Units in Greece. The hypothesis to be tested is that an ovarian stimulation protocol that includes FSH alone without any LH surge prevention regimens is not inferior to a protocol including FSH plus a GnRH antagonist in terms of the clinical outcome in a donor/recipient model. The results of the present study are expected to show whether the addition of the GnRH antagonist is necessary in terms of the frequency of LH secretory peaks and progesterone elevations >1 ng/mL during the administration of the GnRH antagonist according to the adopted frequency of blood sampling in all Units.

Preparation of the Endometrium for Frozen Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review.

Despite the worldwide increase in frozen embryo transfer, the search for the best protocol to prime endometrium continues. Well-designed trials comparing various frozen embryo transfer protocols in terms of live birth rates, maternal, obstetric and neonatal outcome are urgently required. Currently, low-quality evidence indicates that, natural cycle, either true natural cycle or modified natural cycle, is superior to hormone replacement treatment protocol. Regarding warmed blastocyst transfer and frozen embryo transfer timing, the evidence suggests the 6th day of progesterone start, LH surge+6 day and hCG+7 day in hormone replacement treatment, true natural cycle and modified natural cycle protocols, respectively. Time corrections, due to inter-personal differences in the window of implantation or day of vitrification (day 5 or 6), should be explored further. Recently available evidence clearly indicates that, in hormone replacement treatment and natural cycles, there might be marked inter-personal variation in serum progesterone levels with an impact on reproductive outcomes, despite the use of the same dose and route of progesterone administration. The place of progesterone rescue protocols in patients with low serum progesterone levels one day prior to warmed blastocyst transfer in hormone replacement treatment and natural cycles is likely to be intensively explored in near future.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of corifollitropin alfa combined with GnRH agonist triggering in oocyte donation cycles. A prospective longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVE: In order to help make the dream of parenthood come true for oocyte acceptors, it is essential that the procedure is not dangerous or unpleasant for oocyte donors. The aim of this study was to identify differences in safety, efficacy and patient acceptability between a traditional stimulation antagonist protocol with recombinant-FSH (rFSH) with hCG-triggering, compared with an innovative antagonist protocol with corifollitropin alfa (Elonva®) plus GnRH agonist triggering in oocyte donors. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted at an in vitro fertilization center in Greece. The same eighty donors underwent two consecutive antagonist stimulation schemes. Primary outcomes were patient satisfaction (scored by a questionnaire) and delivery rate per donor. Secondary outcomes were mean number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes, metaphase II (MII) oocytes and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate. RESULTS: Donors reported better adherence and less discomfort with the corifollitropin alpha + GnRH agonist-triggering protocol (p<0.001). No significant differences were identified in the clinical pregnancy rate per donor (p=0.13), the delivery rates, the number of oocytes (p=0.35), the number of MII oocytes (p=0.50) and the number of transferred embryos, between the two protocols. However, the luteal phase duration was significantly shorter (p<0.001) in the corifollitropin alpha + GnRH agonist-triggering protocol. Moreover, three cases of moderate OHSS (3.75%) were identified after hCG triggering, whereas no case of OHSS occurred after GnRH agonist ovulation induction (p=0.25). CONCLUSION: The use of corifollitropin alpha combined with a GnRH agonist for triggering is a safe, effective and acceptable protocol for oocyte donors.

COMFFETI, Combined Fresh and Frozen Embryo Transfers per Individual: A New Index of Quality Control for The Performance of emberyologic Labs in The Emerging Era of Segmentation of Cycle and Freeze-All Strategy.

The efficacy of in vitro fertilization (IVF) for treating human infertility has only one final efficacy index and that is the achievement of a delivery. However, with the evolution of the freeze-all strategy, a new problem is arising for evaluating the performance of an embryological team. The aim of the study was to present a new representative index, combining fresh and frozen embryo transfer success rates. In this opinion article, apart from the effectiveness of managing fresh gametes and embryos, we wish to evaluate the efficacy of the processes of both freezing and thawing of the produced embryos. The reporting of pregnancy rates of an IVF unit in the past was primarily laying in the fresh embryo transfer (ET) pregnancy rates. Now with the most frequent utilization of freeze-all strategy, it does not seem logical to report only on poor prognosis patients as all the good cases are postponed for thawed cycles. Ongoing implementation of the freeze-all strategy has indicated the need to establish a new representative index that may combine the success of both fresh and frozen cycles performed in the same woman; an index that may not be biased by the policy of an IVF center towards or against the freeze-all strategy. This newly proposed index, which is referred to as COMFFETI (Combined Fresh #38; Frozen Embryo Transfers per Individual), describes the optimal way to report final reproductive outcomes in the present opinion article.

BRCA1/2 gene mutations do not affect the capacity of oocytes from breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation to mature in vitro.

STUDY QUESTION: Are the maturation rates of oocytes recovered from small antral follicles different between breast cancer patients presenting with or without a BRCA 1/2 gene mutation? SUMMARY ANSWER: BRCA 1/2 gene mutations do not affect the capacity of oocytes from breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation to mature in vitro. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are associated with an increased risk for developing breast and ovarian cancer. Controversy exists about fertility and ovarian reserve in BRCA mutation carriers. Studies suggest that these patients may have low ovarian reserve and poor response to ovarian stimulation. The impaired ability of the mutated BRCA gene to repair double-strand breaks in DNA may prompt oocyte aging, apoptosis and meiotic errors. IVM of oocytes retrieved at germinal vesicle stage, followed by vitrification of metaphase II (MII) oocytes has recently emerged as an option for young women seeking fertility preservation, when ovarian stimulation is unfeasible. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Retrospective cohort study involving 329 breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation using IVM between January 2014 and December 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Inclusion criteria were: age 18-40 years; two ovaries present; no history of chemotherapy; test for BRCA 1/2 mutations performed. Before immature oocyte retrieval, all follicles measuring 2-9 mm in diameter were precisely counted on both ovaries and serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) was measured irrespective of the phase of the cycle. Number of cumulus oocyte complexes (COC) retrieved, maturation rate and number of MII oocytes cryopreserved were compared according to BRCA mutation status. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Overall, BRCA-mutated women (n = 52) and BRCA-negative women (n = 277) were comparable in terms of age (31.7 ± 3.9 versus 32.3 ± 3.8 years, respectively, P = 0.3), BMI (23.4 ± 4.7 versus 22.6 ± 3.7 kg/m2, respectively, P = 0.3) and ovarian reserve tests (antral follicle count: 20.5 ± 11.4 versus 21.7 ± 12.1 follicles, P = 0.5; serum AMH levels: 3.6 ± 2.9 versus 4.1 ± 3.6 ng/ml, P = 0.3, respectively). The number of COCs retrieved did not differ significantly between both groups (8.9 ± 6.9 versus 9.9 ± 8.1 oocytes, P = 0.5). After similar IVM rates (67 ± 24 versus 62 ± 23%, P = 0.2), the number of MII oocytes cryopreserved was similar in patients presenting BRCA mutation or not (5.1 ± 3.8 versus 6.1 ± 5.1, P = 0.1, respectively). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Given the low incidence of the mutation, these preliminary findings should be confirmed by further multi-center studies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Although BRCA mutations are known to alter DNA repair mechanism, it does not seem to impair oocyte capacity to mature in vitro. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(s): None.

A Proof-of-Concept Clinical Trial of A Single Luteal Use of Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Degarelix in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for In Vitro Fertilization: Long Antagonist Protocol.

INTRODUCTION: A drawback of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols in in vitro fertilization (IVF) is that they have limited flexibility in cycle programming. This proof of concept study explored the efficacy of a single-dose, long-acting GnRH antagonist IVF protocol. Trial registration number is NCT03240159, retrospectively registered on March 08, 2017. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The efficacy of a single-dose long-acting antagonist, degarelix, was explored initially in healthy donors and subsequently in infertile patients. In the first part, five healthy oocyte donors underwent ovarian stimulation with this new protocol: in the late luteal phase, at day 24, a bolus injection of degarelix was administered subcutaneously to control the LH surge in the follicular phase. Ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins was initiated subsequently from day 7 to day 10. End points were first to inhibit the LH surge later in the follicular phase and, second, to retrieve mature oocytes for IVF. In the second part, five infertile women received the same bolus injection of degarelix administered during the luteal phase at day 24. Different gonadotropin starting days (day 2 through day 8) were tested in order to observe possible differences in ovarian stimulation. In these infertile patients, fresh embryo transfers were performed to assess the pregnancy efficacy of this protocol on pregnancy outcomes and to address any possible negative effects on endometrium receptivity. RESULTS: In the first part of the study, all donors were effectively downregulated with a single luteal dose of 0.5 ml of degarelix for up to 22 days until the final oocyte maturation triggering day. Mature oocytes were retrieved after 36 h from all patients and all produced 2-7 blastocysts. In the second part, all five infertile patients achieved sufficient LH downregulation and completed ovarian stimulation without any LH surge. All patients (except one with freeze all strategy) had blastocysts transferred and pregnancy occurred in three out of five women. CONCLUSION: A single dose of the long-acting antagonist degarelix during the luteal phase appears to be effective in downregulating hypophysis during ovarian stimulation. This represents a possible new protocol for IVF, which should be further elucidated in RCTs.

Early luteal phase endocrine profile is affected by the mode of triggering final oocyte maturation and the luteal phase support used in recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone-gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in vitro fertilization cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To assess endocrine differences during early luteal phase according to mode of triggering final oocyte maturation with or without luteal phase support (LPS). DESIGN: A prospective randomized study. SETTING: University center for reproductive medicine. PATIENT(S): Four oocyte donors each underwent four consecutive cycles. INTERVENTION(S): To avoid interpatient variation, each donor underwent the same stimulation regimen. However, different modes of triggering final oocyte maturation and LPS were administered: A) 10,000 IU hCG and standard LPS; B) GnRH agonist (GnRHa; 0.2 mg triptorelin), and 35 hours later 1,500 IU hCG, and standard LPS; C) GnRH agonist (0.2 mg triptorelin) and standard LPS; and D) GnRH agonist (0.2 mg triptorelin) without LPS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Blood sampling was performed on the day of ovulation trigger, ovulation trigger + 1 day, and ovum pick-up + 5 days. Serum E2, FSH, LH, and P were measured. RESULT(S): The early luteal phase steroid levels following GnRHa trigger and modified luteal phase support (B) were similar to those seen after hCG trigger (A). However, significant differences were seen between groups A and B compared with C and D, as well as between groups C and D. CONCLUSION(S): Administration of a single bolus of GnRHa effectively induced LH and FSH surges in oocyte donors stimulated with recombinant FSH and cotreated with a GnRH antagonist. However, gonadotropin and steroid levels differed significantly according to the type of luteal phase support used after GnRHa trigger. EUROPEAN COMMUNITY CLINICAL TRIAL SYSTEM (EUDRACT) NUMBER: 2009-009429-26.

New algorithm for OHSS prevention.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) still remains a life-threatening complication of in vitro fertilization treatment (IVF), keeping patients and especially those, who previously experienced OHSS, from attempting infertility treatment and childbearing. The recent implementation of four new modalities: the GnRH antagonist protocol, GnRH agonist (GnRHa) triggering of ovulation, blastocyst transfer and embryo/oocyte vitrification, renders feasible the elimination of OHSS in connection with ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF treatment. The proposed current algorithm is based on the number of follicles developed after ovarian stimulation, setting a cut-off level at the development of 18 or more follicles. Further, fulfilling this criterion, the algorithm is based on four decision-making points: the final day of patient work-up, the day of triggering final oocyte maturation, day-1 post oocyte pick-up (OPU) and day-5 post OPU. If the physician decides to administer hCG for final oocyte maturation regardless the type of analogue used, he has the option on day-1 to either freeze all embryos or to proceed to day-5. On this day, based on the clinical condition of the patient, a decision should be made to either transfer a single blastocyst or to vitrify all blastocysts available. However, this strategy will not guarantee an OHSS free luteal phase especially if a pregnancy occurs. If the physician decides to trigger ovulation with GnRHa, feasible only with the antagonist protocol, embryos can be cultured until day-5. On this day a transfer can be performed with no risk of OHSS and spare blastocysts may be vitrified. Alternatively, on day-1 or day-2 post OPU, all embryos could be frozen. Hopefully, in a near future, GnRHa triggering and vitrification of oocytes will become everyday practice. Only the combined use of a GnRH antagonist protocol with GnRHa triggering and subsequent single blastocyst transfer or embryo/oocyte freezing will completely abolish the risk of OHSS after ovarian hyperstimulation.

Aromatase inhibitors in stimulated IVF cycles.

Aromatase inhibitors have been introduced as a new treatment modality that could challenge clomiphene citrate as an ovulation induction regiment in patients with PCOS. Although several randomized trials have been conducted regarding their use as ovulation induction agents, only few trials are available regarding their efficacy in IVF stimulated cycles. Current available evidence support that letrozole may have a promising role in stimulated IVF cycles, either when administered during the follicular phase for ovarian stimulation. Especially for women with poor ovarian response, letrozole appears to have the potential to increase clinical pregnancy rates when combined with gonadotropins, whereas at the same time reduces the total gonadotropin dose required for ovarian stimulation. However, given that in all of the trials letrozole has been administered in GnRH antagonist cycles, it is intriguing to test in the future how it may perform when used in GnRH agonist cycles. Finally administration of letrozole during luteal phase in IVF cycles offers another treatment modality for patients at high risk for OHSS taking into account that it drastically reduces estradiol levels.

Aromatase inhibitors in post-menopausal endometriosis.

Postmenopausal endometriosis is a rare clinical condition. The diagnosis and treatment of an endometriotic lesion in postmenopausal women is complicated. First line treatment choice should be surgical, given that there is a potential risk of malignancy. Medical treatment may be considered as second line or as an alternate first line treatment whenever surgery is contradicted and aims to alter the hormonal pathway leading to endometriosis progress. Different hormonal regimens have been administered to these patients, with conflicting however results. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) represent one of the most recently used drugs for postmenopausal endometriosis. Clinical data for the use of (AIs) in postmenopausal patients is scarce. Up to date only 5 case reports are available regarding the use of these agents in postmenopausal women. Although definite conclusions may be premature, AIs appear to considerably improve patients' symptoms and reduce endometriotic lesions size. Nonetheless the subsequent induced reduction in estrogen production, leads to certain short-term and long-term adverse effects. Despite the limited available data, AIs appear to represent a new promising method which may improve symptoms and treat these patients, either as first line treatment, when surgery is contraindicated or as a second line for recurrences following surgical treatment. However, careful monitoring of patients' risk profile and further research regarding long-term effects and side-effects of these agents is essential prior implementing them in everyday clinical practice.

Publication bias in reproductive medicine: from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology annual meeting to publication.

BACKGROUND: Treatment decisions should ideally be based on well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Here we determine the rate of full publication of RCTs presented at annual meetings of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), identify potential bias against publishing non-significant results and results not favoring the experimental arm, quantify this bias in case it exists, and identify factors associated with time to publication. METHODS: RCTs presented at ESHRE meetings 2003 and 2004 were recorded. Subsequent search in Medline, Cochrane Library and EMBASE was performed through December 2010 to identify full-text publication in a peer-review journal. RESULTS: Among 155 abstracts describing RCTs 89 (57%) were published in full-text in a peer-review journal. Median time from presentation to publication was 15 months (range: 0-75). In bivariate analysis, only type of presentation and presence of outcomes favoring the experimental arm were related to publication rate. Studies presented orally or reporting a positive outcome in favor of the experimental arm were more likely to be published (P = 0.018 and 0.014, respectively). Results were consistent in a multivariable logistic regression, with odds ratio (OR) 2.51 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.25-5.03] for oral versus poster presentations and OR 2.46 (95% CI, 1.23-4.95) for trials favoring versus not favoring the experimental arm. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed time to publication was shorter for oral presentations (log-rank test = 0.013) and trials favoring the experimental arm, compared with all others (log rank = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: RCTs with significant results in favor of the experimental arm are more likely to be published and are published sooner. Publication bias in reproductive medicine is a fact.

A novel method of luteal supplementation with recombinant luteinizing hormone when a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist is used instead of human chorionic gonadotropin for ovulation triggering: a randomized prospective proof of concept study.

This pilot study investigates the role of luteal supplementation with recombinant LH in an attempt to reverse the poor reproductive outcome previously noticed after GnRH-agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation for IVF. Similar implantation rates were achieved with the novel recombinant LH luteal supplementation scheme compared with the standard luteal P protocol (25.0% vs. 26.7%, respectively). No cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were noticed in either group.

Obstetric outcomes after treatment of periodontal disease during pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether treatment of periodontal disease with scaling and root planing during pregnancy is associated with a reduction in the preterm birth rate. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Trials Registry, ISI Web of Science, Medline, and reference lists of relevant studies to July 2010; hand searches in key journals. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials including pregnant women with documented periodontal disease randomised to either treatment with scaling and root planing or no treatment. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted by two independent investigators, and a consensus was reached with the involvement a third. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed with the Cochrane's risk of bias tool, and trials were considered either high or low quality. The primary outcome was preterm birth (<37 weeks). Secondary outcomes were low birthweight infants (<2500 g), spontaneous abortions/stillbirths, and overall adverse pregnancy outcome (preterm birth <37 weeks and spontaneous abortions/stillbirths). RESULTS: 11 trials (with 6558 women) were included. Five trials were considered to be of high methodological quality (low risk of bias), whereas the rest were low quality (high or unclear risk of bias). Results among low and high quality trials were consistently diverse; low quality trials supported a beneficial effect of treatment, and high quality trials provided clear evidence that no such effect exists. Among high quality studies, treatment had no significant effect on the overall rate of preterm birth (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.40; P=0.15). Furthermore, treatment did not reduce the rate of low birthweight infants (odds ratio 1.07, 0.85 to 1.36; P=0.55), spontaneous abortions/stillbirths (0.79, 0.51 to 1.22; P=0.28), or overall adverse pregnancy outcome (preterm births <37 weeks and spontaneous abortions/stillbirths) (1.09, 0.91 to 1.30; P=0.34). CONCLUSION: Treatment of periodontal disease with scaling and root planing cannot be considered to be an efficient way of reducing the incidence of preterm birth. Women may be advised to have periodical dental examinations during pregnancy to test their dental status and may have treatment for periodontal disease. However, they should be told that such treatment during pregnancy is unlikely to reduce the risk of preterm birth or low birthweight infants.

Identification of the high-risk patient for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), an iatrogenic complication of ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction, is a potentially life-threatening condition. Exogenous human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administered for final oocyte maturation and endogenous hCG produced by a developing pregnancy are fundamental in the development of the disease. Vascular endothelial growth factor is the key molecule mediating the pathophysiology of the syndrome, and genetic predisposition might play a role. Because the most severe cases are usually the late OHSS cases that occur when a pregnancy is established, several predictive markers have been introduced to identify the high-risk patient profile and consequently develop preventive strategies. This article reviews the most recent evidence evaluating the accuracy of different OHSS prediction parameters. Stratification was attempted according to the phase of the ovarian stimulation that the patients undergo. Anti-Müllerian hormone and the number of follicles seen on ultrasound seem promising discriminating factors, whereas prediction models that include age, antral follicle count, and estrogen levels on the day of ovulation triggering provide variable sensitivity and specificity. Until reliable genetic tests are available, and considering that the occurrence of pregnancy is unpredictable, the use of prognostic factors will be mainly indicative of risk rather than preventive of OHSS.

Prognostic factors for delivery in patients undergoing repeated preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening.

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who had a first failed preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening (PGS) cycle. At least one euploid embryo was found in 64% of the patients who had no euploid embryos available on their first PGS cycle. A previous failed treatment because of lack of euploid embryos does not contraindicate a further assisted reproductive cycle.

Higher birth rate after recombinant hCG triggering compared with urinary-derived hCG in single-blastocyst IVF antagonist cycles: a randomized controlled trial.

In a prospective randomized controlled trial, 119 patients were randomized to receive either recombinant hCG (250 µg) or urinary-derived hCG (10,000 IU) for final oocyte maturation in an antagonist protocol with a fixed dose of recombinant FSH (187.5 IU) and predefined single blastocyst transfer. The delivery rate was improved in the recombinant hCG group compared with the urinary-derived hCG group (44.1 vs. 25.7, respectively); however, adequately powered randomized controlled trials are justified to ascertain whether this difference is true.

Preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: guidance for the clinician.

OBJECTIVE: To reevaluate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) prevention techniques and provide a classification system for grading OHSS and evidence-based treatment strategies for preventing OHSS. DESIGN: A literature search was conducted in PubMed for articles published in the last 5 years using the keywords "controlled ovarian stimulation," "controlled ovarian hyperstimulation," "ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome," "OHSS," "prevention," "chorionic gonadotropin," "hCG," "GnRH agonist," "GnRH antagonist," "coasting," and "cryopreservation." We reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective studies, pilot studies, case studies, reviews, and meta-analyses. RESULT(S): There is a shortage of large, prospective RCTs reporting OHSS prediction and prevention strategies. Our review showed that risk factors such as antral follicle count and baseline anti-Müllerian hormone level may identify women at high OHSS risk. Preventative strategies that appear highly effective at reducing or preventing OHSS include GnRH antagonist protocols and the use of GnRH agonists to trigger final oocyte maturation. Moreover, alternative therapies, such as dopamine receptor agonists (Cabergoline), have also emerged as potential new treatment modalities in the management of this disease. CONCLUSION(S): These findings suggest that current treatment guidelines should be updated to incorporate findings from recent literature that show that GnRH antagonist protocols consistently reduce OHSS and that GnRH agonist triggering has considerable promise in preventing OHSS, although further RCTs will be needed to confirm this.

Vaginal progesterone gel for luteal phase support in IVF/ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether vaginal progesterone gel may result in similar or higher pregnancy rates compared with all other vaginal progesterone forms when used for luteal-phase support. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). PATIENT(S): Infertile women undergoing IVF or ICSI. INTERVENTION(S): Vaginal progesterone gel 90 mg once or twice daily versus any other vaginal progesterone form for luteal phase support. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): Seven randomized controlled trials, involving 2,447 patients, were included in the analysis. No difference was observed in the overall clinical pregnancy rate when comparing vaginal progesterone gel with any other vaginal progesterone form. Moreover, clinical pregnancy rates were similar in protocols using only GnRH agonists and when comparing vaginal gel with the traditional treatment of 200 mg×3 vaginal progesterone capsules. CONCLUSION(S): This meta-analysis provides solid evidence that no significant difference exists between vaginal gel and all other vaginal progesterone forms in terms of clinical pregnancy rates.